My Assistant
Hubble trouble..., Serious problems with HST |
Jan 30 2007, 12:08 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Feb 7 2007, 08:56 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Guests |
John Spencer has another excellent glog entry, this one relating to Hubble.
|
|
|
|
Feb 8 2007, 11:13 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 98 Joined: 29-July 05 From: Amsterdam, NL Member No.: 448 |
John Spencer has another excellent glog entry, this one relating to Hubble. John, That’s quite an exciting ride you recount with the Hubble. ACS is out, but WFPC2 is still trucking, and now you even have more time. Hats off to you and your team for buckling down to meet the incredibly sudden deadline! I was curious about the magnitude of new time that your team picked up and how well it’s spaced out. Best I can tell, one full orbit of the Hubble Space Telescope around the Earth is just over 1.5 hours. Of course, half of that time is also not usable for planetary science because Hubble moves behind Earth relative to its target. Twenty new orbits give you an upper limit of 16 hours of undivided time, not taking into account atmosphere interference when rounding the limb, unusable observation periods like that over the South Atlantic Anomaly, etc. That’s a lot of time with HST, but you would burn through the entire set in 32 hours if they were taken consecutively! So could you put this “gift” into perspective for us? [The HST Weekly Timetable Reports are not so great for search queries.] How many orbits were you able to get originally with ACS through the competitive grant process? And over what time period are you able to use this new observation time? Good luck! |
|
|
|
Stu Hubble trouble... Jan 30 2007, 12:08 AM
elakdawalla They got the notice out a full 26 minutes before t... Jan 30 2007, 12:37 AM
Del Palmer QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Jan 30 2007, 12:37 A... Jan 30 2007, 02:28 AM
nprev <clink!!!> Looks like at least... Jan 30 2007, 01:07 AM
stevesliva QUOTE (nprev @ Jan 29 2007, 08:07 PM) the... Jan 30 2007, 01:21 AM
nprev That's true as well, Steve, and maybe I'm ... Jan 30 2007, 01:36 AM
elakdawalla Del Palmer, thank you so much for these notes... Jan 30 2007, 02:40 AM
jamescanvin QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Jan 30 2007, 01:40 P... Jan 30 2007, 03:25 AM
mcaplinger QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Jan 29 2007, 06:40 P... Jan 30 2007, 03:27 AM
tedstryk The press release left out the STIS, which is stil... Jan 30 2007, 12:12 PM
ustrax Just got a quicky one from Lars Christensen:
... Jan 30 2007, 12:32 PM

tedstryk QUOTE (ustrax @ Jan 30 2007, 12:32 PM) Ju... Jan 30 2007, 12:48 PM

ustrax QUOTE (tedstryk @ Jan 30 2007, 12:48 PM) ... Jan 30 2007, 01:59 PM
Jyril QUOTE (tedstryk @ Jan 30 2007, 02:12 PM) ... Feb 8 2007, 04:14 PM
elakdawalla There's a useful update over at badastronomy.c... Jan 30 2007, 02:55 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 07:19 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|