IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Possible future replacement for RTGs, Radiation-based "solar" cells
hendric
post Feb 5 2007, 03:58 PM
Post #1


Director of Galilean Photography
***

Group: Members
Posts: 896
Joined: 15-July 04
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 93



I don't see a "future technologies" forum, so I guess this is probably the next best place for this.

Noticed an interesting article in IEEE Spectrum about using radioactive radiation instead of solar radiation for power generation in "solar" cells. Interesting article... Had me curious about how much power said cells could generate in space, perhaps near the Sun or Jupiter.

Here is the Spectrum article

http://spectrum.ieee.org/feb07/4887

After much searching, here is the USPTO patent application

http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser...ancis+AND+Tsang


--------------------
Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
--
"The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke
Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tty
post Feb 5 2007, 07:05 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 688
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Sweden
Member No.: 273



If it works it could turn burned-out reactor fuel elements into an asset rather than a liability
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Feb 6 2007, 05:29 AM
Post #3


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



These seem like a good idea but to date the trade off's are still better going the RTG route (where you capture the radioactive energy in some absorber thereby providing a heat source and then use a Peltier type junction to generate electrical power from a temperature differential) rather than a direct RF energy conversion via semiconductor (as Photelectric cells do for visible RF radiation). These trade offs are not just direct conversion efficiency but things like the practicality of shielding (Pu-238 is fairly efficient for shielding effectively for example since most of the radiation is in the form of alpha particles) and material degradation have to be factored in (high energy RF radiation has a tendency to transform the delicate semi conductor junction structures the conversion depends on).

Heres a completely un validated source that has some intetresting information. The fact that we have yet to see a viable non thermal radioactive power source is quite telling IMO.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hendric
post Feb 6 2007, 06:03 AM
Post #4


Director of Galilean Photography
***

Group: Members
Posts: 896
Joined: 15-July 04
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 93



Helvick,
Oh, I agree, but it does offer some intriguing possibilities. The efficiencies aren't there yet, 1% is what they quote, but solar cells started really inefficient as well, and are now in the ~30-40% range. RTG efficiency is only in the 3-7% range, so there isn't an insurmountable hurdle to reach. Plus, there's no reason not to piggyback the two technologies, the cells get first bite, surrounded by the RTG thermocouples.

Also, an RTG can only get so small, but these cells could be made arbitrarily small, or large. Might work well for a penetrator that needs a small long term power source.

As for shielding, I assume the cells themselves would act as shields around the power source. You'd need extra protection to prevent a release during a launch failure.

One nice aspect of the design discussed is that it uses liquid semiconductors, so there is no degradation of the junctions; they are self-healing.

Like you said, it's probably a technology still years away from usefulness, but hey, we can say the same thing about fusion...


--------------------
Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
--
"The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke
Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 10:32 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.