IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Apollo Served Space Telescope
gndonald
post Feb 17 2007, 12:20 AM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 212
Joined: 19-July 05
Member No.: 442



While looking through the Encyclopedia Astronautica website, I came across a short entry which shows an Apollo CSM docked to something that looks like an overgrown Hubble Space Telescope. (See: Entry)

The web entry does not have any references however, but the picture which seems to show the launch configuration as well, must have a source.

Can anyone help?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
dvandorn
post Feb 17 2007, 03:05 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



I sort of forget what it was first called, but the program in question was called Apollo Extension Systems (AES) for a while, before being renamed Apollo Applications Projects (AAP).

The whole idea was to come up with ways to use the Apollo technology for missions other than the basic lunar landing mission. These not only included expanded lunar expeditions, they also included a rather wide variety of space station, space astronomy and other missions. Heck, there were even plans for a "fast" manned flyby of Venus using Apollo technology.

It started out with the concept, "Here we have these great spacecraft. What else can we do with them?" When most of the suggestions began to involve designing and building large, complex new spacecraft to fly with Apollo CSMs (after all, the space station concepts required you to build the space stations), the question was modified to "What else can we do with them with minimal additional design and development?" This was when the name changed from AES (which encouraged extending the Apollo systems) to AAP (which simply encouraged the use of existing Apollo technology, with as little new spacecraft development as necessary).

As always, these changes reflected dropping Congressional support and funding levels.

As time went on and those AAP programs which *could* be funded were identified and given green lights, they fell out of the AAP umbrella and either became their own programs (SkyLab, ASTP) or were incorporated into what was called "mainline Apollo" (as the final three expanded lunar expeditions). The rest of the grand plans that never came to be are now delegated to the great dustbin labeled Great Missions That Never Were...

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 05:08 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.