IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Booster Explosion in Australian Skies
djellison
post Apr 2 2007, 12:54 PM
Post #16


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14445
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



It's not that easy - a re-entry might be within a 5 hour window on any one of 3 orbits at any place along a 5000 mile track.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Apr 2 2007, 02:06 PM
Post #17


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8789
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



I wasn't too clear in my last post. What I meant was just a general international warning (NOTAM) for aviators that a reentry was likely in the next 24 hours would be sufficient without specifying location, as well as some training for them about the events (i.e., it may look close, but it probably ain't).


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Apr 6 2007, 05:12 PM
Post #18


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8789
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



QUOTE (tty @ Feb 21 2007, 11:51 AM) *
I thought boosters were supposed to depressurize to avoid this sort of thing.


Speaking of that, how is this usually done exactly? Do most boosters have valves somewhere on the fuel manifold that open up on ground command or via preprogramming, or are there dump valves directly connected to the tanks themselves?

I'm sure there are several different methods, just curious about how this is supposed to work. You obviously don't want them opening up during powered flight... unsure.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Apr 6 2007, 05:57 PM
Post #19


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



Rocket stages in a vacuum are usually vented through the engine bell(s). That way, you don't need to design any separate venting system; all you have to do is activate the proper pumps (the ones that feed the fuels to the combustion chamber during flight) and your fuel or oxidizer goes flowing out of the bell. (You could actually vent hydrogen and oxygen at the same time, though I don't think they do that all that often... hypergolics, of course, you vent separately.)

Yes, these vents can be somewhat propulsive, but not nearly as propulsive as when the engine is actually operating (i.e., when the fuel and oxidizer are undergoing combustion). Apollo S-IVBs were sent on their post-TLI trajectories (often designed to crash into the Moon) using, in part, the propulsive effect of their fuel and oxidizer venting.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Apr 6 2007, 10:15 PM
Post #20


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8789
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Ah...makes sense, thanks, DV. So then, failures to fully purge are usually caused by lack of power, pump failure, or I'd imagine some stray moisture freezing & plugging the outflow path? Should add comm link failure as well, apparently.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 01:40 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.