IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Could Venus watch for Earth-bound asteroids?
SigurRosFan
post Mar 12 2007, 12:01 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 531
Joined: 24-August 05
Member No.: 471



----------
A dedicated space-based telescope is needed to achieve a congressionally mandated goal of discovering 90% of all near-Earth asteroids down to a size of 140 metres by the year 2020, says a report NASA sent to the US Congress on Thursday. Asteroids of that size are large enough to destroy a major city or region if they strike the planet – but NASA says it does not have the money to pay for the project.
----------

- Could Venus watch for Earth-bound asteroids?


--------------------
- blue_scape / Nico -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 3)
Mongo
post Mar 12 2007, 05:36 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 723
Joined: 13-June 04
Member No.: 82



It might be that a telescope orbiting the Sun near the distance of Venus would be the most efficient at detecting NEOs, but the cost would be huge, compared to an Earth-based system. I would rather have a less efficient, but operational, Earth-based effort than a 'better' but far more expensive system that is never built.

Bill
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
edstrick
post Mar 13 2007, 08:52 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



Earth-based and Earth-orbit-based searches have low sensativity to asteroids with aphelions close to Earth's orbit. They spend most of their time near the Sun in the sky and you mostly see their nightsides when they're near Earth, with low brightness crescent illumination.

Move a spacecraft with a 1 meter infrared telescope (thermal IR, I think) in somewhere near Venus' orbit and look out toward Earth's orbit, and you see them in full phase, well illuminated, and thermally hot. Much more detectable.

Also... Some asteroids are in nearly synchronous orbits with the Earth, doing 3 solar orbits while Earth does 2, or 2 orbits while Earth does 3, etc.. (and all the other small number resonances that are relevant) Earthbased searches may miss them for decades, as various bad phasing and viewing geometries can "conspire" to hide them. A near-Venus-orbit mission can't be fooled by such "antics" and will "gotcha" that population as easily as any others in similar orbits.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Mar 24 2007, 11:39 PM
Post #4


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8791
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Here's a link to the full report:

http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/171331main_NEO_report_march07.pdf


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 07:59 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.