IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Odd Galileo Observations
djellison
post Mar 15 2007, 09:53 PM
Post #1


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Perusing the PDS, looking for some ring-obs to compare with the NH stuff that's just come down... are these Galileo ring obs or something else?
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
djellison
post Mar 20 2007, 02:34 PM
Post #2


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Wow - I've never heard/seen of those images - were they NIMS or SSI?

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Mar 20 2007, 02:57 PM
Post #3


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4408
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



I never heard that one. It wouldn't surprise me though. They were trying to study the exact configuration of the antenna. Had they switched to the folded up HGA, there was a chance for a substantially higher data rate. There was also, however, a high chance that this would end up garbling the data, making it uninterpretable. As I understand it, the command to switch back to the LGA would have to then be received through the HGA, so if the negative scenario played out, it would have been the end of the mission.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Analyst_*
post Mar 20 2007, 05:30 PM
Post #4





Guests






QUOTE (tedstryk @ Mar 20 2007, 03:57 PM) *
Had they switched to the folded up HGA, there was a chance for a substantially higher data rate. There was also, however, a high chance that this would end up garbling the data, making it uninterpretable. As I understand it, the command to switch back to the LGA would have to then be received through the HGA, so if the negative scenario played out, it would have been the end of the mission.


This is simply wrong. They could (and would) have loaded a sequence to switch back to the LGA before trying to use the HGA for a short test. You don't have to command this in real time. This has nothing to do with the old computer. Voyager could do this too, look at the recent HYBIC test switch there. And even if this does not work for whatever reason, you end up in some kind of command loss routine, with the spacecraft trying to reestablish contact by switching hardware components. One such switch would be from HGA to LGA. They did not try the HGA because there has been no hope to use the HGA.

Analyst
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Mar 20 2007, 06:35 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2559
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (Analyst @ Mar 20 2007, 10:30 AM) *
This is simply wrong... They did not try the HGA because there has been no hope to use the HGA.

You're both wrong. They did try the HGA, and it didn't help.

And just for fun, here's an actual reference (see page 46):
http://descanso.jpl.nasa.gov/DPSummary/Des...Galileo_new.pdf


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- djellison   Odd Galileo Observations   Mar 15 2007, 09:53 PM
- - tedstryk   QUOTE (djellison @ Mar 15 2007, 09:53 PM)...   Mar 15 2007, 09:55 PM
- - djellison   Ahhh... http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/...   Mar 15 2007, 10:10 PM
- - djellison   Other odd pictures...   Mar 15 2007, 10:16 PM
- - ugordan   Would that be an Io - Amalthea mutual event?   Mar 15 2007, 10:22 PM
- - djellison   I think it is - shows the albedo difference.   Mar 15 2007, 10:28 PM
- - volcanopele   Do you have the date and time for that observation...   Mar 15 2007, 11:15 PM
- - djellison   IMAGE_TIME = 1997-11-06T20:36:51.484Z   Mar 15 2007, 11:21 PM
- - volcanopele   Nice Catch. I thought it was one of those on-chip...   Mar 15 2007, 11:26 PM
|- - tedstryk   There were more images in the series. As I unders...   Mar 15 2007, 11:36 PM
- - djellison   It's a bit odd - like a lot of SSI images, the...   Mar 15 2007, 11:46 PM
|- - tedstryk   The observation was a color view of Io. All but o...   Mar 16 2007, 12:37 AM
- - djellison   So which PDS header thing am I missing - because ...   Mar 16 2007, 08:15 AM
|- - tedstryk   I inferred it from the horizontal and vertical pix...   Mar 16 2007, 10:34 AM
|- - tedstryk   I always thought this shot of Metis was neat.   Mar 16 2007, 11:40 AM
- - mchan   Wow! I have not seen that one before. Thanks...   Mar 16 2007, 12:06 PM
- - ugordan   Man, think of all the wasted Kodak moments Galileo...   Mar 16 2007, 12:10 PM
- - gpurcell   Yep. I've always felt we saw Jupiter "th...   Mar 16 2007, 07:18 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (gpurcell @ Mar 16 2007, 12:18 PM) ...   Mar 16 2007, 07:56 PM
|- - tedstryk   The real problem with the 95 percent has another, ...   Mar 16 2007, 09:37 PM
- - djellison   The 5% we lost was about 95% of the images I'd...   Mar 16 2007, 07:37 PM
- - elakdawalla   Just imagine how different our impression of the M...   Mar 16 2007, 07:45 PM
- - nprev   Just out of curiosity, what prevented Galileo from...   Mar 18 2007, 04:01 PM
- - djellison   You've got X hours of downlink at 120bps inste...   Mar 18 2007, 04:23 PM
- - nprev   Gotcha...and DSN time is not an infinite commodity...   Mar 18 2007, 04:41 PM
- - helvick   The other limit in the equation was the ~109Meg on...   Mar 18 2007, 05:28 PM
|- - tedstryk   QUOTE (helvick @ Mar 18 2007, 05:28 PM) T...   Mar 18 2007, 06:02 PM
||- - tedstryk   It is sad to look at some of the images and think ...   Mar 18 2007, 06:12 PM
|- - tty   QUOTE (helvick @ Mar 18 2007, 06:28 PM) T...   Mar 18 2007, 06:19 PM
|- - tedstryk   QUOTE (tty @ Mar 18 2007, 06:19 PM) Also,...   Mar 18 2007, 06:33 PM
- - nprev   Good grief... ...I really had no idea that it was...   Mar 18 2007, 06:06 PM
- - edstrick   They had put a software block on the tape recorder...   Mar 19 2007, 09:23 AM
- - CAP-Team   I vaguely recall that Galileo shot some pictures o...   Mar 20 2007, 02:33 PM
- - djellison   Wow - I've never heard/seen of those images - ...   Mar 20 2007, 02:34 PM
|- - tedstryk   I never heard that one. It wouldn't surprise ...   Mar 20 2007, 02:57 PM
||- - Analyst   QUOTE (tedstryk @ Mar 20 2007, 03:57 PM) ...   Mar 20 2007, 05:30 PM
||- - mcaplinger   QUOTE (Analyst @ Mar 20 2007, 10:30 AM) T...   Mar 20 2007, 06:35 PM
|||- - tedstryk   I was looking at page 57.   Mar 20 2007, 06:45 PM
||- - tedstryk   As it turns out, I wrongly remembered that the dat...   Mar 20 2007, 06:43 PM
|- - AlexBlackwell   QUOTE (djellison @ Mar 20 2007, 04:34 AM)...   Mar 20 2007, 04:50 PM
- - Edward Schmitz   It strikes me that they could have uploaded a sequ...   Mar 20 2007, 04:10 PM
|- - tedstryk   The computer was extremely old. The switch from t...   Mar 20 2007, 04:29 PM
- - djellison   WEll - it should be in the PDS somewhere - and it ...   Mar 20 2007, 05:17 PM
|- - AlexBlackwell   QUOTE (djellison @ Mar 20 2007, 07:17 AM)...   Mar 20 2007, 05:23 PM
- - Analyst   Thanks. I should have said if they did not try the...   Mar 20 2007, 07:25 PM
|- - tedstryk   I have added some G28 images to my Jupiter page. ...   Mar 21 2007, 11:47 AM
- - ugordan   Is that Europa's or Ganymede's shadow?   Mar 21 2007, 02:37 PM
|- - tedstryk   Not sure. I am at work right now, and don't h...   Mar 21 2007, 02:38 PM
- - ugordan   I'd guess Europa judging by the fuzziness of t...   Mar 21 2007, 02:53 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 04:48 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.