IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Who Is Going To Live Longest?
Which robot will have the longest lifetime?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 61
Guests cannot vote 
remcook
post Oct 9 2004, 06:29 PM
Post #1


Rover Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1015
Joined: 4-March 04
Member No.: 47



I hope we won't have the result for this one in quite some time, but Spirit had some steering problems (only steering problems though)

so which one is going to last the longest?
Oppy did much less legwork, so my guess is on it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >  
Start new topic
Replies (30 - 44)
imran
post Apr 11 2005, 01:52 PM
Post #31


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 3-July 04
From: Chicago, IL
Member No.: 91



The latest power numbers from:
http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/Stories/0,...2810024,00.html

QUOTE
And thanks to an unexpected clearing off of its solar panels by a dust storm on March 9, Spirit is now operating almost like new. On March 8, the rover was operating with 427 watt-hours of power per day. On Wednesday, its power level had leapt to 838 watt-hours per day. "That's a huge jump,' Crisp said.

Opportunity's power supply was at 635 watt-hours Wednesday.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcel
post Apr 11 2005, 02:02 PM
Post #32


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 290
Joined: 26-March 04
From: Edam, The Netherlands
Member No.: 65



QUOTE (djellison @ Apr 11 2005, 01:36 PM)
And that doesnt take into account the usage for trenching, turning in place and slippage etc.

Doug
*


Good points !
Except slipping downhill: driving without turning wheels laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Apr 11 2005, 02:09 PM
Post #33


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



QUOTE (gregp1962 @ Apr 8 2005, 04:38 PM)
QUOTE (ustrax @ Apr 8 2005, 04:19 PM)
I vote for Spirit.

It is a question of faith... rolleyes.gif
*



I'm sensing favoritism here. smile.gif
*




mad.gif What basis to you have to do a statement like that Greg?! mad.gif

biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dot.dk
post Apr 11 2005, 03:36 PM
Post #34


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 578
Joined: 5-November 04
From: Denmark
Member No.: 107



QUOTE (Marcel @ Apr 11 2005, 01:31 PM)
Found it: 2,5 million. With a gear ratio of 332: 1, this means 7530 revolutions

With a wheel-circumference of 81.7 cm....this would be 6.15 km's. Hope they last longer....
*


So far the rover has lasted 5 times longer than planned. So the wheels will be good for 30,75 km at least wink.gif


--------------------
"I want to make as many people as possible feel like they are part of this adventure. We are going to give everybody a sense of what exploring the surface of another world is really like"
- Steven Squyres
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Apr 12 2005, 05:37 PM
Post #35


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4408
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



It might be interesting to take a new poll, since that one was started at a time when it looked like Spirit was going to keel any day from lack of power.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Edward Schmitz_*
post Apr 22 2005, 04:40 PM
Post #36





Guests






I think we will be very surprised the day one of them stops. I predict it will be a complete mistery what happened. No signal, no explanation...

I pick Opportunity to last longer. Not that I don't like Spirit - it just has 21 more days on the ground than Opportunity. And Spirit has always had the worse luck. Let's count them:
1) airbag in the way.
2) software glick.
3) bumpier terrain.
4) didn't land in front of a rock outcrop.
5) hasn't met it's goal of confirming a lake at gusev.
6) wheel problem. (Op now has one too. but even here Op's wheel got stuck in a good position.)
7) dustier conditions. (even with the cleaning, it will probably build up fast, again.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chmee
post Apr 22 2005, 05:27 PM
Post #37


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Joined: 17-March 05
Member No.: 206



I agree, the MER's ultimate fate will probably be a mystery. They will just stop transimitting one day ala Mars Pathfinder... Probably due to battery recharge failure.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deglr6328
post Apr 22 2005, 08:31 PM
Post #38


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 356
Joined: 12-March 05
Member No.: 190



QUOTE (Chmee @ Apr 22 2005, 05:27 PM)
I agree, the MER's ultimate fate will probably be a mystery.  They will just stop transimitting one day ala Mars Pathfinder...  Probably due to battery recharge failure.
*


Shouldn't the rovers be able to go day by day like sojouner did when its battery died? ie. they wake up with the sun and "die" every night at sunset. They have flash memory and some rom space so.... ? huh.gif Anyway I'd love to see more engineering data like battery performance degradation etc. Nearly a year go the guys who built the battery (Lithion) said the rovers were limited not by battery performance but only by solar power availability.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Edward Schmitz_*
post Apr 22 2005, 09:37 PM
Post #39





Guests






Yes, the rovers don't need the batteries. It would be just like deep sleep mode. The biggest difference would be that they would not be able to operate late into the day. Sometimes they are operating after 6:00pm. That would end. Operating time would probably be about 10:00am to 2:00pm.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Apr 22 2005, 10:15 PM
Post #40


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



Dumb question...
Is it possible that sojourner may be still waitng for new orders?...


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pando
post Apr 22 2005, 10:52 PM
Post #41


The Insider
***

Group: Members
Posts: 669
Joined: 3-May 04
Member No.: 73



Considering the self-healing history of many of those problems with the rovers, I wouldn't be surprised if Oppy's steering motor starts suddenly working again... biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deglr6328
post Apr 22 2005, 10:57 PM
Post #42


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 356
Joined: 12-March 05
Member No.: 190



QUOTE (ustrax @ Apr 22 2005, 10:15 PM)
Dumb question...
Is it possible that sojourner may be still waitng for new orders?...
*


Possible? yes. Probable? Not a snowball's chance in Caloris Planitia. laugh.gif

However, sojourner was programmed to drive around pathfinder at a fixed distance in a circle when (if) it couldn't find a signal after it woke up in the morning. Sojourner almost certianly continued to circle for at least some time though, forlornly listening in complete desolation for a signal that it wasn't alone; a signal that would never come. sad.gif After seeing the amazing resolution of MGS imagery of the MER landing sites using the "slewing" technique though, I bet we could see a dark ring of disturbed soil around the pathfinder site if it were still circling or if wind processes haven't completely erased old tracks. I suspect that neither of these scenarios are likely enough to warrant taking some MGS science time to do the imaging though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Apr 22 2005, 11:19 PM
Post #43





Guests






QUOTE (Pando @ Apr 22 2005, 11:52 PM)
Considering the self-healing history of many of those problems with the rovers, I wouldn't be surprised if Oppy's steering motor starts suddenly working again...  biggrin.gif
*


Is that a subtle hint? tongue.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chuckyvt
post Apr 24 2005, 03:33 AM
Post #44


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 296



From what I recall, the Sojouner batteries never failed while the lander was operational. The Sojouner rover had a set of non-recharable batteries, but I don't remember any news of them dying, I could be wrong. The recharagable batteries on the lander did die however, towards the end of the mission. While the Pathfinder lander, as well as the MER rovers apprently, could operate on solar power alone, the failure of the battery pretty much sounded the end of the Pathfinder mission. Since the lander was no longer able to operate and control its internal temperature at night, the increased thermal cycling probably lead to some failure that caused loss of contact with Pathfinder.

QUOTE (deglr6328 @ Apr 22 2005, 04:31 PM)
QUOTE (Chmee @ Apr 22 2005, 05:27 PM)
I agree, the MER's ultimate fate will probably be a mystery.  They will just stop transimitting one day ala Mars Pathfinder...  Probably due to battery recharge failure.
*


Shouldn't the rovers be able to go day by day like sojouner did when its battery died? ie. they wake up with the sun and "die" every night at sunset. They have flash memory and some rom space so.... ? huh.gif Anyway I'd love to see more engineering data like battery performance degradation etc. Nearly a year go the guys who built the battery (Lithion) said the rovers were limited not by battery performance but only by solar power availability.
*

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Apr 24 2005, 02:27 PM
Post #45


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Sojourners batteries gave up after a few weeks and it became a fully solar powered mission.

doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 12:32 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.