My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
A Spotty Saturn. |
| Guest_Sunspot_* |
Oct 14 2004, 10:32 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guests |
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...eiImageID=23747
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...eiImageID=23741 Images from the wide angle camera are nearly filing the frame again: http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...eiImageID=23617 |
|
|
|
Oct 15 2004, 03:38 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() IMG to PNG GOD ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2257 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
Yes, these Saturn images are getting great and much better than anything from Voyager. I'm surprised there have been no spectacular false color closeups at the Cassini website - in addition to looking spectacular they show varying amounts of clouds and different cloud heights so they are not meaningless works of art.
However, the Iapetus images are extremely frustrating. Something is wrong with the pointing so Iapetus is outside the field of view in almost all of the images. And these are images that would have been a bit better than the best Voyager 2 images. Hopefully this can be fixed in time. Also the automatic contrast stretch applied to the images as displayed at the Cassini website makes things even more frustrating since it almost completely ruins the images where Iapetus is visible. Things are probably not going to get really fun until the PDS files get released next summer. |
|
|
|
| Guest_Sunspot_* |
Oct 16 2004, 11:47 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Guests |
QUOTE (Bjorn Jonsson @ Oct 15 2004, 03:38 PM) However, the Iapetus images are extremely frustrating. Something is wrong with the pointing so Iapetus is outside the field of view in almost all of the images. And these are images that would have been a bit better than the best Voyager 2 images. Hopefully this can be fixed in time. Yikes........you're right, it looks like something went wrong with the pointing during the Iapetus observations. Only a couple of fairly decent pics of it http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...eiImageID=23503 http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...eiImageID=23597 Maybe the next batch of RAW images might give us a better look at Iapetus |
|
|
|
| Guest_Sunspot_* |
Oct 17 2004, 08:49 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Guests |
|
|
|
|
| Guest_Sunspot_* |
Oct 18 2004, 01:52 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Guests |
....latest batch look worse.
|
|
|
|
Oct 20 2004, 09:47 PM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 724 Joined: 28-September 04 Member No.: 99 |
In the last observation ( oct 17th ) Cassini apparently just managed to keep Iapetus in frame:
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...4/N00022423.jpg Hopefully this pointing error will be fixed before the Titan flyby... Or is it maybe just a matter of Iapetus' location that is not known accurately enough? |
|
|
|
Oct 21 2004, 09:15 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
It's the later - these observations will allow them to tighten up the orbital params for Iap. so it should happen in the future
Doug |
|
|
|
Oct 21 2004, 06:23 PM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 21 2004, 02:15 AM) It's the later - these observations will allow them to tighten up the orbital params for Iap. so it should happen in the future Doug This encounter also would give us a better mass estimate for Iapetus. Because of our current uncertainty, the Iapetus distant encounter distance on December 30 had to be raised to ensure that Huygens doesn't pass to close to Iapetus. -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 09:42 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|