IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

34 Pages V  « < 10 11 12 13 14 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
KAGUYA lunar explorer (aka SELENE)
rlorenz
post Nov 18 2007, 02:27 PM
Post #166


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 613
Joined: 23-February 07
From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1764



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Nov 16 2007, 07:43 AM) *
New images from the science cameras:

http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071116_kaguya_e.html
Very promising!


Looks very good - sort of HRSC at the moon. Is there going to be anything useful left for LRO
to do ?

It'd be really interesting/useful if someone put together a comparison table of the various cameras that have
been/are going to the moon (resolution, coverage, colors, stereo etc.) Maybe it exists (surely anyone
in the USA flying a camera has to justify it - maybe the Indian/Japanese/Chinese are all 'tech demos' like
AMIE on Smart-1
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Nov 18 2007, 03:56 PM
Post #167


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10255
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



LRO brackets the Kaguya resolution: global stereo and multispectral at 100 m/pixel, high resolution at 1 m/pixel (approx. values).

Somewhere I have seen a table comparing the current set of cameras. I'll try to find it and post it.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
edstrick
post Nov 19 2007, 02:55 AM
Post #168


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



It's probably not really difficult to maintain a 10 or 15 km lunar orbit. You need 2 things.. maybe 3.

1.) A GOOD gravity model, reasonably high resolution, including the farside. You need to predict the exact spacecraft trajectory several orbits in advance to 1 km or better accuracy.

2.) Good tracking to verify what's the real orbit as opposed to the predict. A real-time engineering-ops lidar or RF altimiter wouldn't hurt.

3.) A propulsion system, maybe ion, maybe hypergolics running low thrust engines

You simply need to design a vehicle that will do an orbit trim maneuver or two every orbit. Just a 1/2 km tweek... just keep it circular within a small amount.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Nov 19 2007, 06:07 AM
Post #169


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



I can see a sustained 25km lunar orbit, maybe, but I think a 10km orbit would be pushing it. A lot. After all, the Moon is lumpy, and not just gravitationally -- there are some mountains (well, basin and crater rims, mostly) that rise nearly 10km up from their surrounding terrains.

And, as the gallows humor that surrounded the Apollo 8 flight had it, "60 miles? Just wait 'til you get a load of that 61-mile-high mountain on the Far Side...!"

smile.gif

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mps
post Nov 19 2007, 08:45 AM
Post #170


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 118
Joined: 18-November 07
Member No.: 3964



QUOTE (rlorenz @ Nov 18 2007, 04:27 PM) *
Looks very good - sort of HRSC at the moon. Is there going to be anything useful left for LRO
to do ?

It'd be really interesting/useful if someone put together a comparison table of the various cameras that have
been/are going to the moon (resolution, coverage, colors, stereo etc.) Maybe it exists (surely anyone
in the USA flying a camera has to justify it - maybe the Indian/Japanese/Chinese are all 'tech demos' like
AMIE on Smart-1


Best spatial resolution: Chang'e 120 m/pix, Kaguya 10 m/pix, Chandrayaan-1 5 m/pix, LRO 0.5 m/pix
So, yes, LROC is very useful biggrin.gif

P.S. It's my first post here. My english isn't very good, I hope this will not be a big problem.

Mps
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Nov 19 2007, 09:07 AM
Post #171


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



No problem at all Mps, welcome to UMSF! smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Del Palmer
post Nov 19 2007, 12:46 PM
Post #172


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 213
Joined: 21-January 07
From: Wigan, England
Member No.: 1638



QUOTE (edstrick @ Nov 19 2007, 02:55 AM) *
You simply need to design a vehicle that will do an orbit trim maneuver or two every orbit. Just a 1/2 km tweek... just keep it circular within a small amount.


I remember reading an AIAA paper that suggested "frozen orbits" exist at low altitude, with a caveat that the orbit's inclination matters significantly. It concluded that at certain inclinations (27º, 50º, 76º, and 86º) it is possible for a spacecraft to remain in a low-lunar orbit indefinitely, without OTMs.


--------------------
"I got a call from NASA Headquarters wanting a color picture of Venus. I said, “What color would you like it?” - Laurance R. Doyle, former JPL image processing guy
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Nov 19 2007, 01:16 PM
Post #173


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8789
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Wow...a stable 86 deg low orbit sounds like a real opportunity for an ultra-high resolution global mapping mission, or perhaps escaping volatile sensing/monitoring...


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Nov 19 2007, 02:03 PM
Post #174


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3652
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (edstrick @ Nov 19 2007, 03:55 AM) *
You simply need to design a vehicle that will do an orbit trim maneuver or two every orbit. Just a 1/2 km tweek... just keep it circular within a small amount.

Of course, the original idea was lowering Kaguya's orbit at the end of mission. Neglecting the fuel required to actually lower the orbit, you'd still need propellant to maintain circularity. Spacecraft are usually running on fumes at end-of-mission so that's not very plausible.

What happens if you have unforseen downtime in your tracking support?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Nov 19 2007, 03:08 PM
Post #175


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10255
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



I'm not so sure about the 'frozen orbits'. I could be wrong - I seem to remember being wrong once... - but here, I think this is probably talking about the orbit plane being fixed with respect to the sun, so you have the same surface illumination all the time. Certain inclinations and orbit shapes give just the right combination of gravitational effects that the orbit is always, let's say, 15 degrees from the terminator.

Low lunar orbits are unstable because of the 'lumpy' gravitational field caused by mascons, which in typical low orbits cause the perilune to migrate up and down over time in complex ways - if I understand it correctly, right now, Kaguya's perilune is ascending, but later it will descend until it has to be corrected. The effects of the Earth, the sun and mascons together make life complicated. I don't think this can be 'frozen'.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Nov 19 2007, 03:22 PM
Post #176


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3652
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



I'd think mascons* are by far the greatest destabilizing factor for such a low orbit (10 km), with Earth and Sun getting progressively more important (and mascons less important) at higher orbits.

* mascons and high mountain peaks, that is.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Nov 19 2007, 05:06 PM
Post #177


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14445
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



We've got two more cratering experiments due before Kaguya, Chang'e 1, LRO and Chandaraan 1 will be anywhere near end of life. I'm hoping that they go for barn-storming low-altitude science instead of crashing them into polar crater smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Del Palmer
post Nov 19 2007, 05:09 PM
Post #178


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 213
Joined: 21-January 07
From: Wigan, England
Member No.: 1638



Regarding frozen orbits, I couldn't find the original paper, but here's an article that is derived from it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
remcook
post Nov 19 2007, 05:35 PM
Post #179


Rover Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1015
Joined: 4-March 04
Member No.: 47



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Nov 19 2007, 03:08 PM) *
I'm not so sure about the 'frozen orbits'. I could be wrong - I seem to remember being wrong once... - but here, I think this is probably talking about the orbit plane being fixed with respect to the sun, so you have the same surface illumination all the time. Certain inclinations and orbit shapes give just the right combination of gravitational effects that the orbit is always, let's say, 15 degrees from the terminator.


Judging from the link above it seems that these frozen orbits are different from sunsynchronous orbits of which Phil is speaking. J2 seems quite small for the moon, so I'm not sure sunsynchronous orbits are even possible for the moon. It looks like frozen orbit means that the lumpy gravity field will give nudges to the orbit that are not unstable in these cases.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
spdf
post Nov 19 2007, 08:41 PM
Post #180


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 58
Joined: 17-September 06
Member No.: 1150



Here is some info about the problem which delayed Kaguyas launch.

http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/features/scien...120TDY03104.htm
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

34 Pages V  « < 10 11 12 13 14 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 02:58 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.