IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
ESA's Mars Rover set for 2013
PDP8E
post Jun 12 2007, 08:45 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 808
Joined: 10-October 06
From: Maynard Mass USA
Member No.: 1241



saw this on the BBC site:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6745177.stm


(hope this is the right place for this topic on the site...)


--------------------
CLA CLL
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gpurcell
post Jun 14 2007, 07:19 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 242
Joined: 21-December 04
Member No.: 127



I'm glad they've gone with a more realistic, larger budget. It was the gee-wiz-on-the-cheap feeling of the initial proposal that concerned me the most.

Will MAVEN or Great Escape (Scout 2011) have the capacity to act as a data relay?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jun 14 2007, 09:33 PM
Post #3


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14445
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Yes - all Mars scout orbiters have to have the UHF relay capacity.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
monitorlizard
post Jun 14 2007, 11:35 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 234
Joined: 8-May 05
Member No.: 381



It's purely coincidental, but 2013 is also the year NASA plans to launch the Mars Science and Telecommunications Orbiter, a dedicated relay spacecraft (although its initial orbit will be optimized for science), so there should be plenty of relay assets in Mars orbit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Tamlyn
post Jun 15 2007, 01:51 AM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 447
Joined: 1-July 05
From: New York City
Member No.: 424



Wasn't the Mars Telecom Orbiter canceled? Or is this something new?

(google, google)

OK, the late, lamented Telecom Orbiter was slotted for 2009, so this must be something else. Has it actually been greenlighted? [greenlit?]

Hard to believe that the schedule is "purely coincidental!" :->

TTT
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
monitorlizard
post Jun 15 2007, 05:00 PM
Post #6


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 234
Joined: 8-May 05
Member No.: 381



The thread "two new MEPAG reports" in this same subject category has a link to the newest study on the 2013 Mars Science ( and Telecommunications) Orbiter. It is a different spacecraft from the 2009 Telecommunications Orbiter, with much more emphasis on science (but much more relay capacity than is on Mars Odyssey or MRO).

The 2013 orbiter is not an approved mission, but is the next mission to be defined after the 2011 Scout. Its payload is in the early stages of being defined. And it really is a coincidence that it launches in the same year as ExoMars. Kind of odd timing, really--four years after MSL and two plus years before the 2016 mission, which could be the astrobiology rover. If everyone launches on time, it could be a real boon for ExoMars data return, although the initial orbit wouldn't be optimal for data relay. Come to think of it, the 2013 orbiter would probably be aerobraking for the first several months ExoMars is roving, but if the rover lasts long enough, the orbiter would be available for relay.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Tamlyn
post Jun 18 2007, 11:01 PM
Post #7


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 447
Joined: 1-July 05
From: New York City
Member No.: 424



Thanks for the interesting details about the new orbiter.

TTT
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Tamlyn
post Jun 19 2007, 04:21 PM
Post #8


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 447
Joined: 1-July 05
From: New York City
Member No.: 424



Bruce Moomaw recounts some interesting recent developments in the planning for the new orbiter, apparently now renamed the Mars Science Orbiter.

TTT
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th October 2024 - 11:42 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.