My Assistant
SEASAT Earth Images |
Jun 28 2007, 12:59 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 172 Joined: 17-March 06 Member No.: 709 |
SEASAT was a pioneering mission in using SAR to produce images of
a planetary surface. It was the true precursor mission that made Magellan, the SRTM (STS-99), and Cassini possible. It was launched in 1978 and its mission was relativley short. Even though its main mission was monitoring sea surface conditions, its SAR produced a good number of high-quality images of the continents. Does anyone in the UMSF community have good Earth images from SEASAT that they could share? Those images seem to be scarce on the Internet. Also, images of the SEASAT spacecraft itself would be neat to see. Another Phil |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jul 3 2007, 02:46 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
The Agena was originally developed as an upper stage that would serve as the foundation for the early Keyhole (or KH) spy satellites, but it was used from the outset as a generic upper stage for the Atlas rocket. Not only was it the upper stage of choice for many satellites and planetary probes throughout the early and mid 1960s, it also served as the rendezvous target for Gemini spacecraft.
IIRC, the Agena was the first three-axis-stabilized upper stage developed by the U.S. That made it quite in demand for planetary probes (which, at the time, you didn't want to put into a spin prior to escape trajectory injection), as well as for any satellite that you wanted three-axis-stabilized but didn't want to spend the time and money to develop an RCS for... This was a requirement for the early KH series, but it was a happy circumstance for a whole generation of spacecraft designers. As for SEASAT in particular, I don't believe it was primarily an NRO type of mission. Yes, a lot of the SAR flown by the U.S. has been NRO-related (primarily to get good ground elevation maps for cruise missile navigation), but SEASAT itself was, IIRC, for scientific research. It's easy to confuse this, since the USSR flew a lot of oceanic radar surveillance spacecraft whose jobs were to track U.S. naval movements (including, it was hoped, shallow submarine assets). The Russian SAR required so much power that they flew with actual fission-pile nuclear reactors; it was one of these that crashed onto Canada, spreading nuclear material over the countryside. American SAR missions have used solar energy (or, in the case of the Shuttle-borne SAR, fuel cell-generated power). -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
PhilHorzempa SEASAT Earth Images Jun 28 2007, 12:59 AM
djellison http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=seasat&am...earch... Jun 28 2007, 06:32 AM
PhilHorzempa Thanks for the Google search reference - However... Jul 2 2007, 07:36 PM
tedstryk Well, Phil, dig in...we'd love to see what you... Jul 3 2007, 12:12 AM
Analyst QUOTE (PhilHorzempa @ Jul 2 2007, 07:36 P... Jul 3 2007, 07:08 AM
Paolo If you have access to www.sciencemag.org you can f... Jul 3 2007, 07:46 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 04:59 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|