IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
New Spirit Reprojected Drive Movies
lyford
post Jul 14 2007, 04:49 PM
Post #16


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1281
Joined: 18-December 04
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 124



QUOTE (Gray @ Jul 14 2007, 09:07 AM) *
There is one type of motion in this movie that to me is a little bit disorienting. In several instances it appears as if there is a single image on one side of the 'screen' which then moves across to the other side of the screen.

I imagine this as the camera staying fixed on the view and the rover turning in place to "face" that part of the landscape.


--------------------
Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Jul 14 2007, 05:09 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (lyford @ Jul 14 2007, 04:49 PM) *
I imagine this as the camera staying fixed on the view and the rover turning in place to "face" that part of the landscape.


Yep. As you pointed out there are basically two types of motion in the movie, but the two types are 1) camera direction change (ground relative) and 2) rover location advancement. In the latest movie, I tried keeping the two types of movement separate; in other words, the camera direction will shift, and then the rover will move, and then the camera direction will shift, and so on. When the rover is moving, I keep the camera pointed the same direction, relative to the ground. That was meant to help keep the viewer oriented.

I think the confusing part you mention is where it's just panning so that when the rover moves, the subsequent images will remain in-frame. I'm not convinced this is the best way to do movies like this, it was just an experiment. Some people actually like this style less than the previous style. In earlier movies I would do camera direction change and rover motion at the same time, which seemed to confuse some people (even more). But I think I may like that style better, ultimately.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lyford
post Jul 14 2007, 05:41 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1281
Joined: 18-December 04
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 124



What I like about the quicktime file (despite it's size) is that you can move frame by frame in the QT player. Using the arrow keys I can scroll back and forth on the pans... Almost as if I was controlling the rover. ALMOST. smile.gif

Edited to add - I meant to also say that the feeling I most get from these movies is that I am inside the rover, looking up and out through a periscope of sorts. It works in an odd way....


--------------------
Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gray
post Jul 16 2007, 04:24 PM
Post #19


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 242
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Ohio, USA
Member No.: 34



lyford,

Thanks for the suggestion. I was also imagining myself inside the rover and looking through the mast that contains the camera - sometimes with a narrow field of view (looking at my feet) or sometimes with a broad field of view (looking up at the horizon). For the motion that gave me some problems I'll just imagine that I'm staring at some point near my feet while I twist my body around.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 03:00 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.