My Assistant
T34 (July 19, 2007) |
Jul 13 2007, 11:05 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Rover Driver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1015 Joined: 4-March 04 Member No.: 47 |
Mission description online: http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/prod...description.pdf
..and the return of the playback list |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jul 13 2007, 02:08 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Now THAT is an equatorial flyby!
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2007, 04:44 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Woo hoo! Delighted to see those playback timelines return. They really help deliver blow-by-blow detail on the timing of observations.
--Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2007, 05:11 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 153 Joined: 14-August 06 Member No.: 1041 |
QUOTE (T34 Description) During that period, the Cassini HGA boresight is continuously maneuvered to point to the region on Titan's surface where mirror-like (specular) reflection, if detectable, can be observed at the NASA DSN ground receiving stations at Goldstone and Canberra...
...Potential detectability of a weak echo strongly depends on potential presence of relatively flat (liquid or solid) Titan terrain within the HGA footprint over the surface region probed (the ground track). The T34 observation geometry also enjoys the advantage of extending in time till near C/A where a smaller distance to the surface enhances the measurement signal-to-noise ratio, hence enhances potential detectability of any weak surface echo. |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2007, 07:26 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
Looking forward to that.
Apologies if I've missed some update somewhere, but are we still a bit behind with the release of radar images? Seems like yonks since we saw any more data on lakes/seas etc. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Jul 14 2007, 05:13 PM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1887 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 |
Woo hoo! Delighted to see those playback timelines return. They really help deliver blow-by-blow detail on the timing of observations. --Emily Images playback on Thursday. Shouldn't be any problem getting them onto the raw image pages then. The delays that I've seen have occurred when images arrived on the weekend, like the images from T33 which still are not up |
|
|
|
Jul 20 2007, 07:21 PM
Post
#7
|
||
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1887 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 |
New Titan image are up.
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...0&storedQ=0 Another crater? Original image http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...2/N00086533.jpg |
|
|
|
||
Jul 20 2007, 07:48 PM
Post
#8
|
||
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
Cool-o!
Here is a context image: http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...2/W00030649.jpg And craterform indicated in this image below: (It looks similar in size to the sliced carrot feature in Shangri-La, but without the slices?) -Mike [EDIT: Alan had already indicated the crater nicely in his post.] -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
|
||
Jul 20 2007, 08:38 PM
Post
#9
|
|||
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
Context image coupled with Fensal-Aztlan mosaic showing S Senkyo basin. Putative tectonic lines in Quivra and Aztlan line up with the sets of lines seen in the southern part of the new image in S Senkyo. (Also lines up with putative grabens in N Tseghi and NE Tseghi.)
Generation III squish vector corresponding tectonic ridges - yellow Generation II squish vector corresponding tectonic ridges - purple Note possible breach in circular feature wall indicated by orange arrow. Man, I hope we got higher res images of this! And VIMS would be awesome also! I'll bet that blob to the SW of the new crater is going have similar properties as Adiri. (Can we go back and get a RADAR swath? Whoo-hoo! -Mike -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
||
|
|
|||
Jul 20 2007, 08:38 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
Could be. My thinking though is probably not. Wrong part of Titan, Mike. -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Jul 20 2007, 08:42 PM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
No way!
(What is the lat/lon of Alan's image?) -Mike -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
|
Jul 20 2007, 09:17 PM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1887 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 |
Juramike, your context image was taken before closest approach. I believe you have it upside down.
Edit, scratch that, I checked the CICLOPS page, it looks OK . |
|
|
|
Jul 22 2007, 02:43 PM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
Hmmm....Well, it looks like this particular area in S Senkyo might have been examined and described before:
See: Perry, J. et al LPS XXXVIII (2007) p. 2219. “Cassini ISS observations of Titan: The Titan-20 flyby.” Abstract freely available here. If the dark circle is indeed an impact feature, then it appears to be a heavily eroded, ragged, breached, and dune-sand filled Generation I feature (relatively young – no squish). Probably the only way to confirm it is similar to other circular features would be SAR RADAR imaging of the putative walls and the center. (From the imaging so far, it still could be a crater, but I wouldn't bet the farm on it.) The “tectonic” ridges and lines inferred in the post above mesh nicely with the processed images in the abstract. -Mike -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
|
Aug 8 2007, 02:02 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 153 Joined: 14-August 06 Member No.: 1041 |
QUOTE (T34 Mission Description) During that period, the Cassini HGA boresight is continuously maneuvered to point to the region on Titan's surface where mirror-like (specular) reflection, if detectable, can be observed at the NASA DSN ground receiving stations at Goldstone and Canberra. The T34 experiment enjoys the unique advantage of an observation geometry near the Brewster angle of likely surface compositions throughout the 65 minutes observation period. This special geometry allows unambiguous determination of the surface dielectric constant, and hence its physical state and properties, from simultaneous measurement of the RCP and LCP (right and left circularly polarized, respectively) echo components, if detectable. The Cassini Events log said that these observations were very successful. I'm not holding my breath waiting for analysis - well I guess I am - but I suspect the team will mull over these data for some time before publishing. Titan hasn't failed to surprise us yet. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 11:07 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|