Charon has Geysers too |
Charon has Geysers too |
Jul 18 2007, 04:08 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 530 Joined: 24-August 05 Member No.: 471 |
----------
The only mechanism that explained the data was cryovolcanism, the eruption of liquids and gases in an ultra-cold environment. This action could be occurring on timescales as short as a few hours or days, and at levels that would recoat Charon to a depth of one millimeter every 100,000 years. ---------- - Charon: An Ice Machine in the Ultimate Deep Freeze -------------------- - blue_scape / Nico -
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Jul 19 2007, 01:44 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 501 Joined: 2-July 05 From: Calgary, Alberta Member No.: 426 |
Hmm. This is interesting.
I wouldn't have thought that something as small as Charon could still have liquid water in its interior. This isn't like Enceladus or Miranda where a big gas-giant planet is available to power tidal heating. Just to speculate: My understanding is that a lot of the Earth's uranium floated to the crustal layer during the planet's formation. You'd expect such a heavy element to sink, but uranium likes to combine chemically with oxygen, and that provides it with a lot of buoyancy. On a body like Charon, though, the uranium would only be able to float to the top of the core -- where it would remain, insulated by a 500-km-deep layer of ice. So should we expect ice/rock bodies like Pluto, Charon and Triton to hold onto their radiothermal heat more efficiently than similarly-sized rocky bodies? (Assuming we could find any similarly sized rocky bodies, of course.) |
|
|
|
Jul 23 2007, 05:54 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 153 Joined: 14-August 06 Member No.: 1041 |
Just to speculate: My understanding is that a lot of the Earth's uranium floated to the crustal layer during the planet's formation. You'd expect such a heavy element to sink, but uranium likes to combine chemically with oxygen, and that provides it with a lot of buoyancy. There is also the chromographic soil effect: At a nuclear facility near Hanford, Washington, extremely low concentration radioactive wastes were dumped in an evaporative sludge pond. Over time (probably decades), elements were chomographically separated in the clay, and a layer of high energy waste was concentrated naturally near the surface to an unnatrual level - almost self sustaining. I also have a questionable account about how the problem was discovered: rabbits managed to get through the fence and nibble on grasses growing in the pond. Routine radioactive measurements taken outside of the fence uncovered radioactive rabbit pellets... |
|
|
|
Jul 25 2007, 02:16 AM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2606 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
There is also the chromatographic soil effect: At a nuclear facility near Hanford, Washington, extremely low concentration radioactive wastes were dumped in an evaporative sludge pond. Over time (probably decades), elements were chromatographically separated in the clay, and a layer of high energy waste was concentrated naturally near the surface to an unnatrual level - almost self sustaining. Likely nucleides for heating mantles (at least for Earth) are Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium-40. According to Wikipedia (my copy of Cotton and Wilkenson's is back at the office), uranium likes being in oxidation states U(+4) or U(+6), with the most common form in nature (terrestrial conditions) being U3O8. "Both oxide forms are solids that have low solubility in water and are stable over a wide range of environmental conditions." But at the bottom of an ammonia water ocean, what would be the preferred form? Would it be a uranium hydroxide (U[OH]6), or would it be ligated to ammonium (NH4)xUy(OH)z? Could there be hot water percolating throughout a silicate core concentrating some bizarre uranium species at the silicate/water interface? In Littlebit's Hanford scenario, the water percolates upward and evaporates. (Or does it percolate down, and concentrate the stuff at the "top of the column" - leaching away everything but the uranium) On Charon, maybe the material percolates "upwards" but the uranium species (U3O8?) crashes out when it hits cooler water? This just begs for a cool (and easy to do experiment with a scintillation counter) experimental model. Just not in my lab.... -Mike (I wonder what the forms of other likely radionucleides are? WWTD [What Would Thorium Do?]) [Potassium(40) is easy: KOH would be the preferred form and it is extremely soluble in water - it would not be able to concentrate] -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
|
SigurRosFan Charon has Geysers too Jul 18 2007, 04:08 PM
elakdawalla ...I'm working on a story right now...type fas... Jul 18 2007, 04:18 PM
volcanopele Very interesting! Okay...so now I am confused... Jul 18 2007, 05:42 PM
climber We know there are Geysers on Triton, now Charon, s... Jul 18 2007, 06:00 PM
David This is annoying:
QUOTE Charon is the companion w... Jul 18 2007, 08:32 PM
nprev From Emily's excellent article (way to fly tho... Jul 19 2007, 09:48 AM
djellison QUOTE (nprev @ Jul 19 2007, 10:48 AM) nic... Jul 19 2007, 10:26 AM
Juramike Wow.
Would this then imply that we might expect a... Jul 19 2007, 01:58 PM
remcook If the surface is covered with fresh ice I can ima... Jul 19 2007, 02:53 PM
marsbug Apart from heat due to radioactive materials, are ... Jul 19 2007, 03:06 PM
Rob Pinnegar QUOTE (marsbug @ Jul 19 2007, 09:06 AM) .... Jul 21 2007, 07:24 PM
Littlebit Charon - the ultimate in fresh powder skiing...or ... Jul 19 2007, 03:07 PM
centsworth_II Or would it be powder cross country, with few slop... Jul 19 2007, 03:13 PM
Juramike A current projected resurfacing rate of 1 mm/1E5 y... Jul 19 2007, 03:18 PM
edstrick So THAT'S where they filmed "Night of the... Jul 24 2007, 06:58 AM
nprev Only if the...er...evidence was the size of rugby ... Jul 25 2007, 12:23 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 05:53 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|