My Assistant
No russian spaceship to the Moon until 2027 ... |
| Guest_Zvezdichko_* |
Aug 31 2007, 07:27 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guests |
according to the last information at roscosmos.ru
Russia now officially targeting 2027 for her first manned mission to the moon surface |
|
|
|
![]() |
Sep 5 2007, 12:28 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 66 Joined: 8-November 05 From: Australia Member No.: 547 |
In response to Dvandorns' posting, I think it should be added that the Soviets would never have considered launching a Salyut or Almaz-derivative in a manned condition, as there was no crew ejection system and mass of such plus crewmen would reduce the overall payload capacity. To their credit, the Soviets never launched any manned missions without a crew escape system (unlike the US with its shuttle), even the Buran pad was provided with a rapid escape tunnel and the orbiter was to be fitted with ejection seats (though I suspect that this was probably only intended for the planned test flights).
I don't consider that the Soviets were overtly reckless or uncaring of mission safety, as in political terms, dead cosmonauts are not useful for propaganda purposes. I do accept though that propaganda dictates did override sensible engineering judgement at times (eg 3-man Vostok, 3 -man early Soyuz without pressure suits) which ultimately led to the Soyuz 11 tragedy. After that, they seemed to learn and accept the hard lesson. |
|
|
|
Sep 6 2007, 10:37 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
In response to Dvandorns' posting, I think it should be added that the Soviets would never have considered launching a Salyut or Almaz-derivative in a manned condition, as there was no crew ejection system and mass of such plus crewmen would reduce the overall payload capacity. As I understood it, Almaz was in fact designed to be launched manned, and was redesigned to add a docking port only after the decision was made not to attempt to man-rate the Proton. The original crew return capsule on the Almaz was eventually used for film recovery from the reconnaissance camera -- but it was indeed originally designed to return the crew, not just film. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
Zvezdichko No russian spaceship to the Moon until 2027 ... Aug 31 2007, 07:27 PM
climber QUOTE (Zvezdichko @ Aug 31 2007, 09:27 PM... Aug 31 2007, 07:43 PM
dvandorn At the rate this is going, the Dutchy of Grand Fen... Aug 31 2007, 10:54 PM
nprev Heh, heh...nice reference! From the novel, IIR... Sep 1 2007, 12:52 AM
Phil Stooke It's not clear to me that this is anything but... Sep 1 2007, 01:10 AM
ElkGroveDan One fine Saturday afternoon in April 2027:
Russia... Sep 1 2007, 01:37 AM
nprev Heh, heh...like it, EGD!
Not to drop names, b... Sep 1 2007, 05:06 AM
GravityWaves QUOTE (nprev @ Sep 1 2007, 02:06 AM) Not ... Sep 6 2007, 12:11 PM
edstrick ......But what about the Bobolinks?...... Sep 1 2007, 07:02 AM
ustrax QUOTE (Zvezdichko @ Aug 31 2007, 08:27 PM... Sep 2 2007, 04:49 PM
nprev I believe it! You got a scoop for us, ustrax... Sep 2 2007, 06:09 PM
AndyG 2027? SpaceDaily says 2025.
Mind you, they also s... Sep 3 2007, 09:42 AM
Phil Stooke I think that was just lifted from another source. ... Sep 3 2007, 11:38 AM
dvandorn Just for the record, and yes, I'm sure everyon... Sep 4 2007, 12:02 AM
Zvezdichko Imo Russia now has the capabilities of launching a... Sep 4 2007, 10:37 AM
Big_Gazza Yep, but two essential resources are sadly lacking... Sep 4 2007, 10:49 AM
nprev To be fair, though, it would be pretty hard for th... Sep 4 2007, 12:50 PM
Zvezdichko Russia itself may not be able to fund its own luna... Sep 4 2007, 12:59 PM
ugordan QUOTE (Zvezdichko @ Sep 4 2007, 01:59 PM)... Sep 4 2007, 01:02 PM
Tesheiner Is there any current/future plan to man-rate Arian... Sep 4 2007, 02:18 PM
djellison No - Hermes was the only proposal, but it was cann... Sep 4 2007, 02:35 PM
nprev Haven't heard much about Japan's very simi... Sep 4 2007, 02:46 PM
dvandorn Just in way of clarification...
The Proton cannot... Sep 4 2007, 08:00 PM
nprev QUOTE (dvandorn @ Sep 4 2007, 01:00 PM) J... Sep 5 2007, 12:54 AM
Zvezdichko To be honest, I don't trust Proton even for un... Sep 4 2007, 10:32 PM
Big_Gazza I think the criticism of the Proton (UR-500) boost... Sep 5 2007, 12:01 AM
Zvezdichko QUOTE (Big_Gazza @ Sep 5 2007, 12:01 AM) ... Sep 5 2007, 09:52 AM
Toma B QUOTE (Big_Gazza @ Sep 5 2007, 02:01 AM) ... Sep 5 2007, 09:01 AM
Big_Gazza B)-->QUOTE(Toma B @ Sep 5 2007, 07:01 PM)... Sep 5 2007, 10:03 AM
Big_Gazza QUOTE (Zvezdichko @ Sep 5 2007, 07:52 PM)... Sep 5 2007, 10:22 AM
Big_Gazza Another proton failure... JCSAT11, a Japanese coms... Sep 5 2007, 11:13 PM
Pavel QUOTE (Big_Gazza @ Sep 5 2007, 07:13 PM) ... Sep 5 2007, 11:23 PM
nprev Not good, all right. Baikonur's commercial ... Sep 6 2007, 02:56 AM
Zvezdichko What happened today was a clear example of what I ... Sep 6 2007, 03:03 AM
nprev Not sure it would be wise to kick the whole design... Sep 6 2007, 03:08 AM
Zvezdichko Yes, I speak a lot about disadvantages of the syst... Sep 6 2007, 03:14 AM
nprev Think you're definitely right. Man, there... Sep 6 2007, 03:41 AM
Zvezdichko Errr... and the next flight of a Proton rocket *WA... Sep 6 2007, 04:00 AM
djellison There's ISS components due to launch on it I p... Sep 6 2007, 07:23 AM
Big_Gazza Launch mishaps aside, Proton will still keep flyin... Sep 6 2007, 10:51 AM
ugordan I think most, if not all russian launch vehicles u... Sep 6 2007, 11:18 AM
mchan QUOTE (ugordan @ Sep 6 2007, 04:18 AM) Di... Sep 7 2007, 07:08 AM
nprev Oh, yeah, it's true; there is no sinecure, not... Sep 6 2007, 01:54 PM
Zvezdichko Falcon's second flight was much better than th... Sep 6 2007, 02:25 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 04:55 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|