IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

A Preliminary DEM of Iapetus, Created from a stereo pair
Bjorn Jonsson
post Sep 4 2007, 08:12 PM
Post #1


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2257
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



In time, just before the Cassini Iapetus flyby I did a preliminary DEM of a small area of Iapetus' surface:

Attached Image


The area it covers:

Attached Image


I created the DEM from a stereo pair using software I have been developing (see this thread for more information).

The DEM is based on images with somewhat inaccurate viewing geometry - the pointing information in the PDS files really isn't accurate enough for my purposes. This is difficult to correct, in part because of Iapetus' somewhat irregular shape. I probably need to establish a global control point network to determine the exact pointing but there's a catch-22: To make it easier I really need accurate pointing information for at least one image but this is difficult to determine without a control point network...

In the DEM the difference between black (lowest) and white (highest) is 33 km. This is highly inaccurate because of the viewing geometry inaccuracies mentioned above. An obvious 'proof': Distances from Iapetus' center range from 785 to 818 km according to my stereo software. This cannot be correct, the best-fit triaxial ellipsoid has been determined to be 747.1 x 749.0 x 712.6 km. However, relative elevations over fairly small areas should be reasonably accurate so things like crater depths can be estimated. For example the depth of the crater centered at ~(380,220) is ~3.5 km.

A lot of additional imaging coverage is available so I should be able to make a bigger DEM once I have determined accurate pointing for the images I will be using.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Phil Stooke
post Oct 9 2007, 09:33 PM
Post #2


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10265
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



As before, a version of the above very nice DEM merged with shaded relief. I used the Photoshop emboss filter on the b/w DEM and merged it with the colour version.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Oct 10 2007, 12:38 AM
Post #3


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4408
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Wow! This is some great stuff.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Dec 13 2007, 12:25 AM
Post #4


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2257
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



A bigger and significantly improved version:

Attached Image


This is a mosaic of two DEMs computed from two stereo pairs. Altitudes range from -9.8 km (black) to 14.9 km (white) relative to a 748x713 km spheroid. Latitude ranges from -13.25 to 76.75 degrees and longitude from 29.5 to 144.125 degrees. The viewing geometry I used is probably somewhat more accurate than in the earlier versions and I am also in the process of establishing a rudimentary control point network. This DEM is computed using a new version of my software that is about 10 times faster than the earlier version so I was able to calculate it to a higher subpixel accuracy than earlier. Other improvements also result in slightly higher resolution. A consequence of these improvements is a bit more overall noise in the DEM. The image above is a slightly smoothed version.

A rendering generated using a color coded version:

Attached Image


An enormous impact basin measuring about 600 km across (~40% of Iapetus' radius) is obvious in the DEM/rendering. It is visible on close inspection in the original images I used. However, in the east this basin seems to have been destroyed. This is definitely a real feature in the DEM - there is an Icarus paper in press with DEMs that appear remarkably similar to mine (in fact they were highly useful as ground truth).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 01:15 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.