IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Characterization of the near-Earth Asteroid 2002NY40
Jyril
post Sep 11 2007, 09:00 AM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 249
Joined: 11-June 05
From: Finland (62°14′N 25°44′E)
Member No.: 408



arXiv.org preprint: Characterization of the near-Earth Asteroid 2002NY40

Using the Maui Space Surveillance System a group of astronomers has managed to image the near-Earth asteroid 2002 NY40. The adaptive optics images are stunning and certainly the best visible light images of an NEA ever taken.


--------------------
The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 14)
Toma B
post Sep 11 2007, 10:07 AM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 648
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Subotica
Member No.: 384



OK .... so where can I see those "best visible light images of an NEA ever taken".


--------------------
The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful.
Jules H. Poincare

My "Astrophotos" gallery on flickr...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Sep 11 2007, 10:35 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



Figures are at the end of the preprint - see Figure 2, page 22.


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jyril
post Sep 11 2007, 11:04 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 249
Joined: 11-June 05
From: Finland (62°14′N 25°44′E)
Member No.: 408



Yes, sorry about that.

Fraser Cain of the Universe Today has written a nice plain English news piece of the asteroid: The Triangle that Skimmed Past the Earth: Asteroid 2002 NY40

QUOTE
Getting these high resolution images of the asteroid was actually pretty difficult. At its very brightest, closest point, when Asteroid 2002 NY40 could be seen at the greatest resolution, it was moving very quickly across the sky - it covered the diameter of the Moon every 6 minutes, zipping across the sky at 65,000 km/hour. The background stars changed with every image. Instead of calibrating against a single set of background stars, the researchers had to calibrate each image against whatever images happened to be in the field of view at the time.


That's pretty fast!


--------------------
The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jyril
post Sep 11 2007, 11:06 PM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 249
Joined: 11-June 05
From: Finland (62°14′N 25°44′E)
Member No.: 408



QUOTE (Jyril @ Sep 11 2007, 12:00 PM) *
...the best visible light images...


Read: optical. They're of course in IR images.


--------------------
The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Toma B
post Sep 12 2007, 06:49 AM
Post #6


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 648
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Subotica
Member No.: 384



Wow! really great images.
I wonder what HST images of "2002NY40" would look like...guess I never know... sad.gif


--------------------
The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful.
Jules H. Poincare

My "Astrophotos" gallery on flickr...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
edstrick
post Sep 12 2007, 07:05 AM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



Uh.. did anybody notice that that article nowhere mentions the diameter of this rocklet? <or did I miss that?>
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Sep 12 2007, 08:09 AM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



There is a 1km scale bar on the images - longest dimension is about 1km


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Sep 12 2007, 10:46 AM
Post #9


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4407
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



During its close flyby, it was probably moving too fast for HST to track it well enough to do nearly as well - if you look at the ACS lunar shots, you see the same thing.

It is exciting to have these new views, in addition to the radar views we already had.

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Toma B
post Sep 12 2007, 11:18 AM
Post #10


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 648
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Subotica
Member No.: 384



QUOTE (tedstryk @ Sep 12 2007, 12:46 PM) *
...in addition to the radar views we already had.

Is that the same asteroid?


--------------------
The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful.
Jules H. Poincare

My "Astrophotos" gallery on flickr...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 12 2007, 11:30 AM
Post #11


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Yes - 2002NY40
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Sep 12 2007, 11:32 AM
Post #12


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3652
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Sooo.... it's a shape-shifter? One minute it's a peanut, the next a triangle?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Sep 12 2007, 02:30 PM
Post #13


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4407
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (ugordan @ Sep 12 2007, 11:32 AM) *
Sooo.... it's a shape-shifter? One minute it's a peanut, the next a triangle?



If you look at the first radar image (the small one), it matches up relatively well with the groud-based shape. I think the infrard people had the misfortune of catching it when one of the lobes was hidden.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Sep 12 2007, 06:51 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3652
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Didn't they in fact say they were lucky to catch the asteroid when it presented the largest side to us? Wouldn't that be some of the other radar views for example?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Sep 13 2007, 12:41 AM
Post #15


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4407
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Those images were taken from Hawaii. There is a good chance that by that point it had dropped below the Horizon (or hills) at Arecibo. So it may be why Arecibo only got that angle from further out.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 08:00 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.