My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
Characterization of the near-Earth Asteroid 2002NY40 |
Sep 11 2007, 09:00 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 249 Joined: 11-June 05 From: Finland (62°14′N 25°44′E) Member No.: 408 |
arXiv.org preprint: Characterization of the near-Earth Asteroid 2002NY40
Using the Maui Space Surveillance System a group of astronomers has managed to image the near-Earth asteroid 2002 NY40. The adaptive optics images are stunning and certainly the best visible light images of an NEA ever taken. -------------------- The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.
|
|
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:07 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 648 Joined: 9-May 05 From: Subotica Member No.: 384 |
OK .... so where can I see those "best visible light images of an NEA ever taken".
-------------------- The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful.
Jules H. Poincare My "Astrophotos" gallery on flickr... |
|
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:35 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
Figures are at the end of the preprint - see Figure 2, page 22.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 11:04 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 249 Joined: 11-June 05 From: Finland (62°14′N 25°44′E) Member No.: 408 |
Yes, sorry about that.
Fraser Cain of the Universe Today has written a nice plain English news piece of the asteroid: The Triangle that Skimmed Past the Earth: Asteroid 2002 NY40 QUOTE Getting these high resolution images of the asteroid was actually pretty difficult. At its very brightest, closest point, when Asteroid 2002 NY40 could be seen at the greatest resolution, it was moving very quickly across the sky - it covered the diameter of the Moon every 6 minutes, zipping across the sky at 65,000 km/hour. The background stars changed with every image. Instead of calibrating against a single set of background stars, the researchers had to calibrate each image against whatever images happened to be in the field of view at the time. That's pretty fast! -------------------- The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.
|
|
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 11:06 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 249 Joined: 11-June 05 From: Finland (62°14′N 25°44′E) Member No.: 408 |
...the best visible light images... Read: optical. They're of course in IR images. -------------------- The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2007, 06:49 AM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 648 Joined: 9-May 05 From: Subotica Member No.: 384 |
Wow! really great images.
I wonder what HST images of "2002NY40" would look like...guess I never know... -------------------- The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful.
Jules H. Poincare My "Astrophotos" gallery on flickr... |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2007, 07:05 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
Uh.. did anybody notice that that article nowhere mentions the diameter of this rocklet? <or did I miss that?>
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2007, 08:09 AM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
There is a 1km scale bar on the images - longest dimension is about 1km
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2007, 10:46 AM
Post
#9
|
||
![]() Interplanetary Dumpster Diver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 4407 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
During its close flyby, it was probably moving too fast for HST to track it well enough to do nearly as well - if you look at the ACS lunar shots, you see the same thing.
It is exciting to have these new views, in addition to the radar views we already had. -------------------- |
|
|
|
||
Sep 12 2007, 11:18 AM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 648 Joined: 9-May 05 From: Subotica Member No.: 384 |
...in addition to the radar views we already had. Is that the same asteroid? -------------------- The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful.
Jules H. Poincare My "Astrophotos" gallery on flickr... |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2007, 11:30 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Yes - 2002NY40
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2007, 11:32 AM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Sooo.... it's a shape-shifter? One minute it's a peanut, the next a triangle?
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2007, 02:30 PM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Interplanetary Dumpster Diver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 4407 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
Sooo.... it's a shape-shifter? One minute it's a peanut, the next a triangle? If you look at the first radar image (the small one), it matches up relatively well with the groud-based shape. I think the infrard people had the misfortune of catching it when one of the lobes was hidden. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2007, 06:51 PM
Post
#14
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Didn't they in fact say they were lucky to catch the asteroid when it presented the largest side to us? Wouldn't that be some of the other radar views for example?
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Sep 13 2007, 12:41 AM
Post
#15
|
|
![]() Interplanetary Dumpster Diver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 4407 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
Those images were taken from Hawaii. There is a good chance that by that point it had dropped below the Horizon (or hills) at Arecibo. So it may be why Arecibo only got that angle from further out.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 07:54 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|