IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

41 Pages V  « < 27 28 29 30 31 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Paolo's Plunge, First dip into Victoria
ngunn
post Jan 9 2008, 09:43 PM
Post #421


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



Brilliant! Makes sense of the whole thing for someone like me too lazy to figure it out from the new imagery.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shaka
post Jan 9 2008, 10:22 PM
Post #422


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1229
Joined: 24-December 05
From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones.
Member No.: 618



I take climber's remarks and raise them by a power of TEN! Just what I've been needing, Tesh, me old matey!
Now if you could enlarge this a little more in plan view so we can recognize individual slabs in the pancams, and mark on them the RAT holes as we work down the Duck Bay transect, I will always cheer for Brazil in the World Cup! biggrin.gif


--------------------
My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dburt
post Jan 9 2008, 10:36 PM
Post #423


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 384
Joined: 4-January 07
Member No.: 1555



QUOTE (nprev @ Jan 9 2008, 02:11 PM) *
Indeed intriguing. Kuenen at first glance looks very much like a conglomerate (or perhaps a breccia)!

Angular fragments would make it a breccia. As I recall (I don't offhand remember the rock's name or Sol) a glassy-appearing piece of brecciated rock was examined during the rim traverse, and some contributors here guessed it might be suevite (impact melt breccia). Let's hope for a closer look at Kuenen.

-- HDP Don
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Jan 10 2008, 05:40 AM
Post #424


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Jan 9 2008, 07:00 AM) *
Edited: BTW, if anybody is interested, here's a "map" of the targets that have been imaged since the start of the plunge.
I simply wanted to add my praises, Tesh. Your latest work has been a very valuable resource. smile.gif


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jan 10 2008, 06:24 AM
Post #425


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



I've just seen your pic Tesh and wanted to add my thanks. I didn't even realise all those rocks had been named, to be honest. If there's any justice there'll be a feature - or at least a rock! - inside VC named after you for all your hard work. smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jan 10 2008, 08:46 AM
Post #426


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4280
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Thanks, all.

QUOTE (climber @ Jan 9 2008, 10:20 PM) *
To my eyes it could even be included (replace ?) your "Oppy route" for quite a while.

Actually I had my doubts if post it here or at the "route map" thread.
I got the idea to make it from an Alan's post (thanks mate!) at the beginning of the plunge. Since he didn't continue to update that one I did it by myself since then, including the features/targets imaged usually with the pancam like I do on the route map.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc
post Jan 10 2008, 10:19 AM
Post #427


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 276
Joined: 11-December 07
From: Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Member No.: 3978



My complements to you Tesh.
Your map is certainly invaluable and impressive (it helped me get my bearings right).


--------------------
We talk of nothing but Curiosity here
Follow me on twitter or Google +
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Jan 11 2008, 07:45 AM
Post #428


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (dburt @ Jan 9 2008, 04:36 PM) *
Angular fragments would make it a breccia. As I recall (I don't offhand remember the rock's name or Sol) a glassy-appearing piece of brecciated rock was examined during the rim traverse, and some contributors here guessed it might be suevite (impact melt breccia). Let's hope for a closer look at Kuenen.

I have wanted to see impact melt since we first landed on Mars. The matrix of the breccia is the impact melt, of course -- the clasts are pieces of rock that were caught up in the melt. That melt ought to give us a first-order feel for the gross composition of the target where the Victoria impactor struck. If the melt has remained generally unaltered, we have an important clue to the mineralogical nature of the surface 'way back when this hole in the ground formed.

This assumes, of course, that any piece of impact melt we find here is of local origin. As you are fond of pointing out, Herr Doktor, there are an awful lot of impact craters on Mars... *smile*...

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aussie
post Jan 11 2008, 10:32 AM
Post #429


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 144
Joined: 17-July 07
From: Canberra Australia
Member No.: 2865



I thought that as a general rule impact melt was displaced at distance from the transient crater and lightly shocked ejecta from the deepest excavated layers was deposited in the crater vicinity?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc
post Jan 11 2008, 11:08 AM
Post #430


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 276
Joined: 11-December 07
From: Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Member No.: 3978



QUOTE (Aussie @ Jan 11 2008, 01:32 PM) *
I thought that as a general rule impact melt was displaced at distance from the transient crater and lightly shocked ejecta from the deepest excavated layers was deposited in the crater vicinity?


Indeed that's what I think too. So if this impact melt is from Victoria the first thing we ought to wonder about is 'why is it at the rim.'

More likely it is from another crater. Or perhaps something happened during the creation of Victoria that this impact melt got embedded in the ejecta material which in turn was deposited at the present rim?


--------------------
We talk of nothing but Curiosity here
Follow me on twitter or Google +
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Jan 11 2008, 02:01 PM
Post #431


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Jan 10 2008, 02:46 AM) *
Thanks, all.
Actually I had my doubts if post it here or at the "route map" thread.
I got the idea to make it from an Alan's post (thanks mate!) at the beginning of the plunge. Since he didn't continue to update that one I did it by myself since then, including the features/targets imaged usually with the pancam like I do on the route map.

I liked the improved versions posted by others shortly afterwards, some with simulated rovers, more than mine so I figured it would be better to let them take over.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Jan 11 2008, 04:57 PM
Post #432


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



Impact melt can also form a lining within the crater. In smaller craters, a glassy lining is made up of impact melt. (Since we have never landed in or taken samples of the floor of a large lunar impact crater, we have almost no data on how abundant impact melts might be in the floor units of large impact craters.)

If this *is* local, I would imagine that the suevite was emplaced in the ejecta and has since eroded out of one of the prominent capes. Being harder than the surrounding rock, it would simply fall out of the cape structure and tumble down the inner slope of the crater.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shaka
post Jan 11 2008, 07:37 PM
Post #433


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1229
Joined: 24-December 05
From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones.
Member No.: 618



But we have studied and modeled the formation of large craters on earth. The floor of such craters often largely consists of impact melts and melt breccias. (N.B. Chicxulub is a large crater; Victoria is a small crater.) The deeper layers are typically in situ, whereas upper layers have fallen back from the core of the ejecta column. I would not describe any of the floor melt layers as "lightly" shocked, unless we are talking about rubble from the adjacent surface being washed in by an oceanic backflow. (Not applicable, probably, for Victoria.)


--------------------
My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Jan 12 2008, 05:38 AM
Post #434


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



On sol 1409 Opportunity captured an MI mosaic of part of the Smith/Lyell contact. I think I can see some textural changes across the mosaic.
Attached Image

I think this MI mosaic imaged the area roughly outlined on this pancam.
Attached Image


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jan 12 2008, 09:01 PM
Post #435


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



QUOTE (jvandriel @ Jan 8 2008, 10:21 PM) *
Here is the complete panoramic view taken with the R0 Navcam on Sol 1402 and Sol 1404.


jvandriel, I used your superb mosaic as usual, this time with addition of artificial colors:
Attached Image


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

41 Pages V  « < 27 28 29 30 31 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 12:29 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.