IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6  
Closed TopicStart new topic
Board Upgrade
jvandriel
post Sep 22 2007, 06:36 PM
Post #76


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1377
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



Doug,

thanks for your quick reply.

But, when I scroll down in the Editor page

there is No Attachments Editor.

( I have switched off the popp-up blocker )

jvandriel
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 22 2007, 06:51 PM
Post #77


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13852
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I don't know what to suggest other than what I've already said. Can you find other Invision 2.3 boards that have the same problem (or no problem at all) ?. Is there something unique to your config that a google-search finds? You can see that using the exact same version of Firefox, I'm getting fine results (I upgraded from 2.0.0.5 to .07 just to be sure we were on the same page)

Woahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh-hang on a minute

This is the News section - where only admins and mods can start threads or do attachments. Do you have problems in other sub-forums? I've flicked the switch on member attachments in this sub-forum as a double-check.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Sep 22 2007, 07:23 PM
Post #78


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1377
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



Doug,

thanks again.

I have 2 computers, 1 running under Vista and the other one running under XP.

The attachment editor in the Vista computer suddenly appeared ( I did check it before

I send you the first E-mail)

but on the XP computer I still do not get the attachment editor.

For now I can live with it and, as you can see, I have already used it to edit

my last post with the Spirit pano from Sol 1315.

Thanks again for your help.

jvandriel
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Sep 22 2007, 07:26 PM
Post #79


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4660
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Sloughhouse, CA
Member No.: 197



You should see if the problem occurs in different browsers - starting with both IE and Firefox on the same machine.

Check all of your security settings and make sure http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com is one of the trusted sites for everything (see my instructions earlier in this discussion)

Note that pop-up blockers are often in place in BOTH your browser and your security routine like McAfee or Norton, so make sure BOTH are off if that's what you are testing for.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Del Palmer
post Sep 22 2007, 08:06 PM
Post #80


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 213
Joined: 21-January 07
From: Wigan, England
Member No.: 1638



QUOTE (djellison @ Sep 19 2007, 04:06 PM) *
I like the new font - but I'm in a big minority (none of the admins like it either smile.gif )

I'll see what I can do by x-ref'ing the CSS's of the two and get the old font on the new theme.


After a couple of days of getting used to the Pro skin, I definitely would not want to go back to Verdana. In fact, I like Arial so much that I've set my browser fonts to override (already have colors on override, so what the heck). So if the old font is applied to the new theme, I should still see Arial. smile.gif


--------------------
"I got a call from NASA Headquarters wanting a color picture of Venus. I said, “What color would you like it?” - Laurance R. Doyle, former JPL image processing guy
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Sep 23 2007, 05:24 AM
Post #81


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3254
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



Whereas Verdana has always been my font of choice, and I have truly enjoyed having it here. To me, Arial is ugly and hard to read.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ddeerrff
post Sep 23 2007, 09:40 PM
Post #82


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 67
Joined: 19-April 05
Member No.: 251



Clicking on a thumbnail picture now opens the picture IN A FULL SCREEN sized browser window, bypassing my set default browser window size. Not to full screen, but to a full sized window. This is not the way to last board version behaved. If I want things open to full screen, I'll do it myself.

Anyone else find this as annoying as I do?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 23 2007, 09:48 PM
Post #83


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13852
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Can't say I even noticed the difference - I usually open attachments in their own tabs anyway - and there's not a thing I can do about it even if I hated it There are things I can change - there are things I can't. That's in the can't category. If I had a PHP/SQL guru on the admin team ( and this isn't the first time I've asked for help in that regard) perhaps we could work something out.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ddeerrff
post Sep 23 2007, 11:33 PM
Post #84


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 67
Joined: 19-April 05
Member No.: 251



Doug, looking back that sounds more harsh than it was meant. Particularly since I mostly lurk and am enriched by other's postings without really contributing anything myself.

I also usually open these pictures in a new tab (SeaMonkey) and that still works fine. But I thought I recalled them also opening in the default size even when opened in a new window.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 24 2007, 06:47 AM
Post #85


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13852
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (ddeerrff @ Sep 24 2007, 12:33 AM) *
SeaMonkey


I thought Camino was obscure smile.gif

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Sep 24 2007, 03:01 PM
Post #86


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1174
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Seattle
Member No.: 530



QUOTE (dvandorn @ Sep 23 2007, 01:24 AM) *
Whereas Verdana has always been my font of choice, and I have truly enjoyed having it here. To me, Arial is ugly and hard to read.

Mine too, as far as non-serif fonts go. Arial smooshes words like filial, iliac, italic, subliminal, djellison, legibility, a little too much for my preference. Perhaps I need an environment with less glare, because my font preferences seem to follow what the US govt is trending towards in road sign fonts:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/12/magazine/12fonts-t.html

Fascinating presentation, if you're curious about font legibility. Especially slide #8 in which they vary only the spacing of the font, and it shows why I dislike the smooshiness of Arial.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post Sep 25 2007, 04:51 PM
Post #87





Guests






Doug, don't know if the question was asked before, but on which hardware does the UMSF forum run?
huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 25 2007, 06:07 PM
Post #88


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13852
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Shared hosting at Imhosted.com -
Operating system Linux
Kernel version 2.6.17.7-grsec
Machine Type i686
Apache version 1.3.37 (Unix)
PERL version 5.8.7
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th November 2014 - 12:25 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.