IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Huygens landing site data
peter59
post Oct 6 2007, 07:17 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 571
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Silesia
Member No.: 299



T13 - Targeted Distant Look (Huygens Landing site)
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
Free software for planetary science (including Cassini Image Viewer).
http://members.tripod.com/petermasek/marinerall.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Juramike
post Oct 8 2007, 05:02 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



I matched up the Huygens landing site DISR mosaic PIA06438 with the T8 RADAR Swath zoomed to the same scale. In the second graphic I've indicated the "spooky dude" formation in light blue. These pixels are almost resolvable in the RADAR as slightly lighter pixels compared to immediate neighbors. The darker portion of the channel seen in the DISR mosaic is also apparent in the T8 RADAR swath zoom area. (The "spooky dude" formation is just south of a RADAR stitch zone).

Attached Image
Attached Image

I've created a colorized terrain map of the Huygens landing site based primarily on the DISR mosaic, but also including the T8 RADAR data, as well building on the information presented in Soderblom's recent article (Soderblom et al. Planetary and Space Science (2007), doi:10.1016/j.pss.2007.04.015 "Topography and geomorphology of the Huygens landing site on Titan.")

Attached Image
Attached Image

In the tectonic ridge (bright island) terrain, yellow is for the upper ridge portion identified by both DISR topology model and RADAR bright ridgetops in the T8 Swath and T13 distant view. The eroded ridge terrain mantle deposits (RADAR bright gray) are left uncolored (thus gray) in the graphic..

For the channel terrain, lighter shades of blue are for the brightest (DISR) upper channel deposits (such as the spooky dude formation) while darker shades of blue and purple are for the DISR dark and RADAR dark smooth ice muds. There is a much larger range of DISR shading than represented by these five colors. This would be a really fun place to try contrast enhancement to bring out all the subtleties.

The lightest blue terrain could correspond to low density nanoporous clathrate cobbles (cryopumice) that has been floated into drifts during flood events. These could be the identity of the cobbles that we saw in the final Huygens images on the surface.

Another possibility is that the light blue terrains could be the extension of the tectonic ridge across the channel, and that this portion of the ridge has been breached, carved, and heavily eroded during flooding and tidal events through the channel. (An argument against these being original ridge sections is that these have been breached crossways at a later point during weaker flows – that indicates these are easily carved materials. These are seen in closeup images of the spooky dude formation close to the touchdown area)

On the southeastern shore of the channel, there is another little island-section of bright tectonic ridge (the island to the SE of the Huygens landing site), as evidenced by RADAR bright terrain in the T8 Swath.

The mantle of the SE Island that extends into the channel (indicated in the diagram by orange semi-transparent shading) looks similar by RADAR to that of the NW island, but by DISR the terrain looks very different. By DISR, the mantle doesn't have any obvious channels - it looks like a confusing mess of visible bright and visible dark terrain. Although these images are not well-resolved, there appear to be a series of pits among the bright dark patterns. Is it possible that this is some of the "rotted terrain" like was described in post 203, Equatorial Sand Seas thread?


Overall, I think this is a pretty cool example of the information and possible interpretations you can extract by combining low-altitude visual (DISR) and orbital RADAR information. And it allows a good characterization of "channel" terrain on Titan.

-Mike


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- peter59   Huygens landing site data   Oct 6 2007, 07:17 PM
- - Juramike   I took Ugordan's enhanced image of the T36 ISS...   Oct 6 2007, 07:20 PM
- - Juramike   Wow, talk about exciting! Thanks, peter59...   Oct 6 2007, 07:50 PM
- - Juramike   With the availability of the T39 ISS mosaics and t...   Oct 7 2007, 06:09 AM
- - ngunn   Thank goodness someone's at last had a go at t...   Oct 7 2007, 07:02 PM
|- - Stefan   QUOTE (ngunn @ Oct 7 2007, 09:02 PM) Than...   Oct 8 2007, 12:11 PM
|- - ngunn   QUOTE (Stefan @ Oct 8 2007, 01:11 PM) We ...   Oct 8 2007, 12:21 PM
- - Juramike   I matched up the Huygens landing site DISR mosaic ...   Oct 8 2007, 05:02 AM
- - djellison   Stuff   Oct 8 2007, 03:58 PM
- - ngunn   Ah, there we are now, thanks Doug. A project for...   Oct 8 2007, 09:02 PM
|- - Juramike   QUOTE (ngunn @ Oct 8 2007, 05:02 PM) A pr...   Oct 9 2007, 02:44 AM
- - ngunn   SUPERB, Mike. Having you around makes me very lazy...   Oct 9 2007, 08:35 AM
- - ngunn   Crop from the new Titan map. On enlargement the Hu...   Oct 16 2007, 02:48 PM
- - ngunn   Here are the papers specific to the landing site: ...   Oct 20 2007, 02:14 PM
- - scalbers   This looks like a good thread to reiterate that th...   Oct 20 2007, 04:01 PM
- - ngunn   Very roughly the picture seems to be: Dunes - dark...   Oct 22 2007, 09:35 AM
|- - Juramike   ISS and RADAR are giving two seperate pieces of in...   Oct 22 2007, 02:09 PM
- - ngunn   More high res imaging of the landing site area to ...   Nov 7 2007, 10:31 AM
- - jekbradbury   I took Mike's side-by-side comparison of the f...   Jun 1 2008, 08:53 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 11:19 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.