My Assistant
4 ton flyby for Mars 69? |
Oct 14 2007, 02:39 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 212 Joined: 19-July 05 Member No.: 442 |
I've been looking through the NTRS server and recently found a document dealing with plans to fit a Centaur stage to a Saturn Ib rocket. (Saturn Ib/Centaur Study (3.8mb)) (Picture Below). The simulated 'launch stats' in the document are for a 4 (metric) ton flyby probe on the Mariner 6/7 trajectory to Mars and I'm curious to find out just how far out of the planning stage this got, can anyone help?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Oct 14 2007, 04:39 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 234 Joined: 8-May 05 Member No.: 381 |
Congratulations, you have just found an early study document related to the very ambitious Voyager Mars program of the 1960s (the farther back you go into the 60s, the more ambitious the program was). Around 1962/63, the plans were for a Mariner Mars 1966 flyby with atmospheric probe and a Voyager Mars orbiter and lander for 1969. Voyager Mars was a heavy spacecraft that would have used the Saturn IB-Centaur. When that rocket was cancelled, Voyager was actually scheduled to launch on a Saturn V!
The great book "On Mars: Exploration of the Red Planet 1958-1978" (NASA SP-4212) has a very detailed history of all this in Chapter 4. Fortunately, this is available online (and free) from NASA at: history.nasa.gov/SP-4212/contents.html (click on: "Chapter 4: Voyager: Perils of Advance Planning, 1960-1967") |
|
|
|
Oct 14 2007, 07:56 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 212 Joined: 19-July 05 Member No.: 442 |
Congratulations, you have just found an early study document related to the very ambitious Voyager Mars program of the 1960s (the farther back you go into the 60s, the more ambitious the program was). Thanks for that, I did think of Voyager Mars at first, but as I 'knew' that mission in the dual launch on a Saturn V I dismissed it. However, the other reason I dismissed Voyager Mars is that the writers clearly state that the hypothetical mission is a flyby mission and again what I knew of Voyager Mars was that it was going to be an orbiter lander. I think I might go digging on the NTRS again and see if I can bring this to light, after all there may be something here that didn't make the official history. As an example I've seen several mentions to AS-207/208 being slated for the Apollo '2' CSM/LM rendezvous in orbit that later became Apollo 9, I've since found a report that indicates it would have been AS-205/208 for that mission. |
|
|
|
Oct 14 2007, 05:00 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
I've seen several mentions to AS-207/208 being slated for the Apollo '2' CSM/LM rendezvous in orbit that later became Apollo 9, I've since found a report that indicates it would have been AS-205/208 for that mission. Initially the planning was to use AS-205 to launch the CSM and AS-208 to launch the LM. Then, after the Fire, the planning was pushed back farther into the Saturn IB inventory and the CSM was shifted off of AS-205 and onto AS-207. All of this planning went away when the manned Apollo flights were pushed back long enough for the Saturn V program to mature and produce a flyable booster prior to the Earth-orbital manned LM checkout flight. The initial mission was informally referred to as "AS-258," the later one informally designated "AS-278." Eventually, Apollo 9 flew as AS-504. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
gndonald 4 ton flyby for Mars 69? Oct 14 2007, 02:39 AM
monitorlizard Yeah, the history of the Voyager Mars program, and... Oct 14 2007, 09:15 AM
dvandorn QUOTE (monitorlizard @ Oct 14 2007, 04:15... Oct 14 2007, 05:02 PM
monitorlizard Actually, I do remember one other Mars idea that w... Oct 14 2007, 09:30 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 04:42 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|