IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

29 Pages V  « < 7 8 9 10 11 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Sliding into 'Home Plate North', Heading for Spirit's 2008 Winter Retreat
SpaceListener
post Nov 30 2007, 07:09 PM
Post #121


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 231
Joined: 19-August 07
Member No.: 3299



Incredible.

Now the previous stucked right front wheel seems to be freed by some kind of blocked small stone or oxides. After that, the wheel engine might have ended up by burning any winding core due to the extra force to overcome the stucked wheel.

Due to the high ratio of engine revolution to wheel rotation, it will act as some kind of clutch. However, if the rover goes slows, the troubled wheel might rotate as similar as the others ones.

I hope to hear any confirmation news about: Is the front right wheel rotating with propulsion or is rotating as a free wheel? I seems that the most probably case is of the second option.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ilbasso
post Nov 30 2007, 07:40 PM
Post #122


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 752
Joined: 23-October 04
From: Greensboro, NC USA
Member No.: 103



fredk's photo of the recent drive seems to indicate that the wheel is still dragging.


--------------------
Jonathan Ward
Manning the LCC at http://www.apollolaunchcontrol.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Nov 30 2007, 08:50 PM
Post #123


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5546
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



I bet Steve and the guys are having a fine old time looking at the detail visible in the tracks and scuffs on the new images... smile.gif

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
john_s
post Nov 30 2007, 09:40 PM
Post #124


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 508
Joined: 3-December 04
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Member No.: 117



I don't know why, but I find these closeup images of the churned-up dirt really compelling. Perhaps it's because, deprived of their context in the Martian landscape, they look so familiar, like something you could see anytime on a dirt road here in Colorado. Then the realization that you are actually looking at another planet is all the more amazing.

Either that, or it's just fond memories of playing in a sandbox as a kid...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Nov 30 2007, 09:45 PM
Post #125


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13232
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (SpaceListener @ Nov 30 2007, 07:09 PM) *
Is the front right wheel rotating with propulsion or is rotating as a free wheel?


Neither. It's not working, it's still broken - but the fairly unique situation of this nasty terrain has had enough of a drag on the wheel to rotate slightly even though the force required to rotate it (and the motor thru the gearing) is very high.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Nov 30 2007, 10:01 PM
Post #126


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5546
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



I know exactly what you mean John. I've been colourising these images quite a while now - succesfully for a much shorter time, I know!!! laugh.gif - but seeing those surface close-ups appear on my screen is probably more rewarding than seeing a big panorama or landscape take shape, and I think it's because the surface just looks so comfortingly familiar at such close range... you can almost smell the dirt, can almost feel the dust clogging your nostrils, can almost feel the stones and grit and grains sifting through and past and over your fingers as you trail your hand through it, can't you? When that image came up on my screen I just sat here and stared at it, imagining reaching into the screen, taking a pinch of that dry dust between my fingers and just rubbing them together... as you say, just like a big kid playing out on a dirty hillside during school summer holidays... smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Nov 30 2007, 10:08 PM
Post #127


Bloggette par Excellence
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3963
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



QUOTE (nprev @ Nov 29 2007, 11:41 PM) *
That gear ratio Doug cited is a very powerful argument for some sort of clutch...even a simple emergency disconnect (pyro-fired guillotine that would sever the gearshaft?) that would let a stuck wheel rotate freely on future rovers.

This is triggering a vague memory of reading about Lunokhod -- I recall reading that the Lunokhods had a mechanism to free a stuck wheel, little pyros for each wheel, to separate them from their motors and allow them to spin freely. The things certainly had wheels to spare. Here's an archival Time magazine article that refers to it.

--Emily


--------------------
My blog - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Nov 30 2007, 10:28 PM
Post #128


Bloggette par Excellence
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3963
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



I was just checking MMB and this Pancam view from sol 1368 struck me as being rather pretty. Can anyone tell me if any of these rocks have names?

--Emily

Attached Image


--------------------
My blog - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Dec 1 2007, 12:22 AM
Post #129


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2736
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



John and Stu: my thoughts exactly. Very "earthy".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Dec 1 2007, 05:43 AM
Post #130


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2164
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



Emily: I don't think those rocks have any assigned names. Those images seem to be a piece of the third part of a panorama called "West Valley View" according to the pancam data tracking page.

As for the topic of the stuck wheel and the various options such as clutches, pyro-severers, etc; I am pretty sure we explored all those options and more, shortly after Spirit first lost the mobility of that wheel.


--------------------
...Tom (thinks he should use more emoticons)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Dec 1 2007, 06:07 AM
Post #131


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2736
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



There's an extremely odd comment in the latest spirit update. After saying she broke free from the depression (called "Tartarus"), they write:
QUOTE
Team members are pulling out all the stops to get Spirit to a winter location where, based on solar power projections, the rover has a chance at survival. As the crow flies, that spot is 240.5 meters (130.8 feet) away. During the next few weeks, Spirit's journey to "Winter Haven 3" is expected to be no less difficult, requiring the rover to maneuver across a sandy, rocky valley along the western edge of "Home Plate."

First of all, WH3 is nowhere near 240 metres from here. More like a tenth that. Secondly, why on earth would they want to cross the valley to the west of HP?? A change of plans? blink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Dec 1 2007, 06:24 AM
Post #132


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1967
Joined: 28-December 04
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (fredk @ Dec 1 2007, 01:07 AM) *
First of all, WH3 is nowhere near 240 metres from here.

Thirdly, 240 meters is nowhere near 130.8 feet!

Using the 240 meter figure and westerly direction, it looks
like someone didn't get the memo that Spirit is not wintering
at Von Braun. Given the trouble Spirit just had in a little
sandy depression, I'd say it's an excellent idea not to try
and cross that sandy valley before winter arrives.

edit: Well Von Braun's not really West, but the press release
image here shows a location, Tsiolkoski, about 100 meters to the West.
I'm still sure they are not crazy enough to try and get there.

This post has been edited by centsworth_II: Dec 1 2007, 06:51 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
general
post Dec 1 2007, 08:11 AM
Post #133


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 229
Joined: 21-June 05
Member No.: 417



Perhaps they mean something like this:

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aussie
post Dec 1 2007, 08:49 AM
Post #134


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 144
Joined: 17-July 07
From: Canberra Australia
Member No.: 2865



[quote name='centsworth_II' date='Dec 1 2007, 06:24 AM' post='104871']
Thirdly, 240 meters is nowhere near 130.8 feet!

Emily got it right in the latest update - 40 meters (131 feet). But they were so precise with their 130.8 feet (referenced from what data point?) that it has to have been a conversion finger problem. Admitedly updates are not a risk area but I would have thought that NASA would have made any official use of non metric units an anathema following the loss of the climate orbiter. huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Dec 1 2007, 09:26 AM
Post #135


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3114
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



I dunno, Aussie -- there are a lot of late-middle-aged baby boomers (like me) who were raised with the American versions of the old Imperial units, and we (well, at least I) have a hard time thinking in metric. I can *translate* into metric in my head (even conversationally), but I can't really think in it easily.

The more recent generations have been well exposed to metric, far more well exposed than my own generation. I mean, hey, when I think of changes in velocity for spacecraft, my "gut level" frame of reference is still feet per second, OK? But the kids these days -- they can think better in metric than I can.

That said, the purveyor of the recent update isn't having problems thinking in metric -- as far as I can tell, he/she is just having a problem thinking... rolleyes.gif

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

29 Pages V  « < 7 8 9 10 11 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th May 2013 - 07:29 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.