Sliding into 'Home Plate North', Heading for Spirit's 2008 Winter Retreat |
![]() ![]() |
Sliding into 'Home Plate North', Heading for Spirit's 2008 Winter Retreat |
Nov 30 2007, 07:09 PM
Post
#121
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 231 Joined: 19-August 07 Member No.: 3299 |
Incredible.
Now the previous stucked right front wheel seems to be freed by some kind of blocked small stone or oxides. After that, the wheel engine might have ended up by burning any winding core due to the extra force to overcome the stucked wheel. Due to the high ratio of engine revolution to wheel rotation, it will act as some kind of clutch. However, if the rover goes slows, the troubled wheel might rotate as similar as the others ones. I hope to hear any confirmation news about: Is the front right wheel rotating with propulsion or is rotating as a free wheel? I seems that the most probably case is of the second option. |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2007, 07:40 PM
Post
#122
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 752 Joined: 23-October 04 From: Greensboro, NC USA Member No.: 103 |
fredk's photo of the recent drive seems to indicate that the wheel is still dragging.
-------------------- Jonathan Ward
Manning the LCC at http://www.apollolaunchcontrol.com |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2007, 08:50 PM
Post
#123
|
||
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 5546 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
I bet Steve and the guys are having a fine old time looking at the detail visible in the tracks and scuffs on the new images...
-------------------- |
|
|
|
||
Nov 30 2007, 09:40 PM
Post
#124
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 508 Joined: 3-December 04 From: Boulder, Colorado, USA Member No.: 117 |
I don't know why, but I find these closeup images of the churned-up dirt really compelling. Perhaps it's because, deprived of their context in the Martian landscape, they look so familiar, like something you could see anytime on a dirt road here in Colorado. Then the realization that you are actually looking at another planet is all the more amazing.
Either that, or it's just fond memories of playing in a sandbox as a kid... |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2007, 09:45 PM
Post
#125
|
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 13232 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Is the front right wheel rotating with propulsion or is rotating as a free wheel? Neither. It's not working, it's still broken - but the fairly unique situation of this nasty terrain has had enough of a drag on the wheel to rotate slightly even though the force required to rotate it (and the motor thru the gearing) is very high. Doug |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2007, 10:01 PM
Post
#126
|
|
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 5546 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
I know exactly what you mean John. I've been colourising these images quite a while now - succesfully for a much shorter time, I know!!!
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2007, 10:08 PM
Post
#127
|
|
![]() Bloggette par Excellence ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3963 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
That gear ratio Doug cited is a very powerful argument for some sort of clutch...even a simple emergency disconnect (pyro-fired guillotine that would sever the gearshaft?) that would let a stuck wheel rotate freely on future rovers. This is triggering a vague memory of reading about Lunokhod -- I recall reading that the Lunokhods had a mechanism to free a stuck wheel, little pyros for each wheel, to separate them from their motors and allow them to spin freely. The things certainly had wheels to spare. Here's an archival Time magazine article that refers to it. --Emily -------------------- |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2007, 10:28 PM
Post
#128
|
||
![]() Bloggette par Excellence ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3963 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
I was just checking MMB and this Pancam view from sol 1368 struck me as being rather pretty. Can anyone tell me if any of these rocks have names?
--Emily -------------------- |
|
|
|
||
Dec 1 2007, 12:22 AM
Post
#129
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2736 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
John and Stu: my thoughts exactly. Very "earthy".
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2007, 05:43 AM
Post
#130
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2164 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
Emily: I don't think those rocks have any assigned names. Those images seem to be a piece of the third part of a panorama called "West Valley View" according to the pancam data tracking page.
As for the topic of the stuck wheel and the various options such as clutches, pyro-severers, etc; I am pretty sure we explored all those options and more, shortly after Spirit first lost the mobility of that wheel. -------------------- ...Tom (thinks he should use more emoticons)
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2007, 06:07 AM
Post
#131
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2736 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
There's an extremely odd comment in the latest spirit update. After saying she broke free from the depression (called "Tartarus"), they write:
QUOTE Team members are pulling out all the stops to get Spirit to a winter location where, based on solar power projections, the rover has a chance at survival. As the crow flies, that spot is 240.5 meters (130.8 feet) away. During the next few weeks, Spirit's journey to "Winter Haven 3" is expected to be no less difficult, requiring the rover to maneuver across a sandy, rocky valley along the western edge of "Home Plate." First of all, WH3 is nowhere near 240 metres from here. More like a tenth that. Secondly, why on earth would they want to cross the valley to the west of HP?? A change of plans? |
|
|
|
Dec 1 2007, 06:24 AM
Post
#132
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1967 Joined: 28-December 04 Member No.: 132 |
First of all, WH3 is nowhere near 240 metres from here. Thirdly, 240 meters is nowhere near 130.8 feet! Using the 240 meter figure and westerly direction, it looks like someone didn't get the memo that Spirit is not wintering at Von Braun. Given the trouble Spirit just had in a little sandy depression, I'd say it's an excellent idea not to try and cross that sandy valley before winter arrives. edit: Well Von Braun's not really West, but the press release image here shows a location, Tsiolkoski, about 100 meters to the West. I'm still sure they are not crazy enough to try and get there. This post has been edited by centsworth_II: Dec 1 2007, 06:51 AM |
|
|
|
Dec 1 2007, 08:11 AM
Post
#133
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 229 Joined: 21-June 05 Member No.: 417 |
Perhaps they mean something like this:
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2007, 08:49 AM
Post
#134
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 144 Joined: 17-July 07 From: Canberra Australia Member No.: 2865 |
[quote name='centsworth_II' date='Dec 1 2007, 06:24 AM' post='104871']
Thirdly, 240 meters is nowhere near 130.8 feet! Emily got it right in the latest update - 40 meters (131 feet). But they were so precise with their 130.8 feet (referenced from what data point?) that it has to have been a conversion finger problem. Admitedly updates are not a risk area but I would have thought that NASA would have made any official use of non metric units an anathema following the loss of the climate orbiter. |
|
|
|
Dec 1 2007, 09:26 AM
Post
#135
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3114 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
I dunno, Aussie -- there are a lot of late-middle-aged baby boomers (like me) who were raised with the American versions of the old Imperial units, and we (well, at least I) have a hard time thinking in metric. I can *translate* into metric in my head (even conversationally), but I can't really think in it easily.
The more recent generations have been well exposed to metric, far more well exposed than my own generation. I mean, hey, when I think of changes in velocity for spacecraft, my "gut level" frame of reference is still feet per second, OK? But the kids these days -- they can think better in metric than I can. That said, the purveyor of the recent update isn't having problems thinking in metric -- as far as I can tell, he/she is just having a problem thinking... -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th May 2013 - 07:29 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|