IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
After MSL?, Astrobiology Field Laboratory?
centsworth_II
post Nov 12 2007, 05:41 PM
Post #16


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (vjkane @ Nov 11 2007, 11:28 AM) *
Third: locating possible trace-gas sources may be an important new data input at this point in picking where to make future landings (as well as MSL's data).

Yes! We need to pin down the elusive Martian methane!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
algorimancer
post Nov 12 2007, 06:03 PM
Post #17


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 20-April 05
From: League City, Texas
Member No.: 285



QUOTE (Stephen @ Nov 11 2007, 10:44 PM) *
...33-page description of the ASL in a recent issue of the Astrobiology journal....

Good. I see that EDL and rover are derived from MSL - no point in reinventing the wheel again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eluchil
post Nov 13 2007, 06:10 AM
Post #18


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 36
Joined: 14-July 06
Member No.: 972



QUOTE (Stephen @ Nov 12 2007, 04:44 AM) *
The ASL is in competition with three other possible missions for the 2016 & 2018 slots, most of them landers. The ASL will probably get one of the slots, but if it's the 2018 one and the Mars Science Orbiter fliers in 2013 then the odds are such that it will probably NOT be the next lander after the MSL. (It may however be the next ROVER, since one rather doubts the twin mid-rover option will fly in 2016 if another rover, the ASL, is booked in for 2018.)


There are a lot of possibilities (even assuming that some discovery or policy change doesn't redirect or scuttle the program). Still my feeling is that there isn't enough money for 2 flagship class missions in the two slots. Indeed, I doubt that they can even fund one and launch MSR in 2020. Therefore, I expect the other opportunity to go to a Scout which is likely to be an orbiter. Or it may be skipped entirely to provide funds for sample return (though in recent years NASA has been loathe to completely skip a Mars launch opportunity). On the other hand, my supposition should not be mistaken for certainty and I would be esspecially happy to see a lander network concept fly since seismic monitoring is the best (only?) way to study the deep interior of the planet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Nov 13 2007, 12:12 PM
Post #19


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8789
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Heck, I'd be delighted just to see three fixed-site seismometers on the planet spaced 120 deg apart in longitude, combined with a camera & a methane-sniffer. I suspect that Mars is very quiescent because of its extremely thick crust, but think we need to do some quake monitoring to provide context for other observations (landslides, dark streaks, etc.)

Sounds like a Discovery-class effort, but I'm not sure if you could do it with one launch.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 03:05 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.