My Assistant
QUB2PNG, Playing with Cassini VIMS cubes |
Nov 9 2007, 12:59 AM
Post
#1
|
||
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
I've made some progress with the IR channel on VIMS, have managed to do partial calibration of the cubes. It's still buggy, but at least it's something. Here's a couple of rough results, all using R=5um, G=2um, B=1.26um.
In case of Saturn the green and blue channels were scaled up to match the intense thermal radiation. The cubes were flatfielded, quantum efficiency corrected and divided by solar spectrum, though I don't know if all the steps were carried out correctly. Dark current subtraction remains to be done - it's possibly the reason why the lower left Titan insets have banding in the red channel. I'm actually pretty satisfied with the way these two turned out, they are reminiscent of official VIMS surface composites, including the "blue" material. Hopefully I'll be able to put something out to convert cubes to PNGs before long. A better solution would be a GUI but that's the tedious part for me. -------------------- |
|
|
|
||
![]() |
Nov 14 2007, 10:08 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Rover Driver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1015 Joined: 4-March 04 Member No.: 47 |
I assume it would be relatively straightforward to repeat the recent analysis of Adamkovics et al. from telescope data and show the morning drizzle. As far as I can see it's just subtracting images between 2.060-2.070 um (an average might be good enough, maybe) from the same image between 2.027-2.037 um times 0.72 (or some factor close to that depending on the exact shape of the filter used). Although, as is common with Science and Nature papers, it is not quite clear (to me) what they did exactly.
|
|
|
|
Nov 14 2007, 07:42 PM
Post
#3
|
||
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
I don't have access to that paper to really know what they did. Even if that were the case, I wonder if a repeat would be straightforward as I get the impression they were looking at very specific wavelengths on the edge of a methane window and whether or not VIMS' discrete wavelengths would fit the bill. The closest channels are 166 at 2.03424 microns and 168 at 2.06757 microns.
I did try some funky ratios between spectral windows, below are some composites. The left-hand sides show R=5 microns, G=2.7 microns, B=2 microns. The right sides are all ratio composites: R=5 microns/2 microns G=5 microns/2.7 microns B=2.78 microns/2.7 microns & contrast stretched. The upper image is one of the longest IR exposures, while the lower one is more typical of distant shots so it's more noisy. In the 5/2 ratio image the contrast between dark equatorial stuff and the rest is practically lost. Tui Regio and Hotei Arcus consistently stand out. Intriguing. Things at Titan at small scales really start to look strange if you take a ratio of 2.7/2.78 microns. Quivira, for example, looks completely different: ![]() Top left: normal 2 micron reflectance Top right: 2.7/2.78 micron ratio, heavily contrast stretched Bottom left composite: R=ratio, B=2 micron, G=( R+B )/2 Bottom right composite: Classic 5 micron (red), 2 micron (green), 1.26 micron (blue, slightly overexposed in raw data) -------------------- |
|
|
|
||
ugordan QUB2PNG Nov 9 2007, 12:59 AM
djellison Ahh - congratulations - to be honest, command line... Nov 9 2007, 07:40 AM
ugordan QUOTE (djellison @ Nov 9 2007, 08:40 AM) ... Nov 9 2007, 08:02 AM
remcook That looks very impressive! I think PDS also h... Nov 9 2007, 10:20 AM
ugordan I'm "reverse-engineering" that softw... Nov 9 2007, 11:33 AM
elakdawalla ugordan, this is awesome. I particularly liked th... Nov 9 2007, 06:20 PM
ugordan Preliminary, test release of QUB2PNG which dumps t... Nov 11 2007, 12:39 AM
ugordan In the meantime, a few more "results":
... Nov 11 2007, 01:02 AM
ElkGroveDan Wow Gordan. This stuff is amazing. That atmosph... Nov 11 2007, 03:08 AM
nprev Beautiful work, Gordan; really awe-inspiring, actu... Nov 11 2007, 02:50 PM
ugordan New version is up, improved IR background subtract... Nov 11 2007, 03:44 PM
nprev Wow... ...just don't know what to say, man. T... Nov 11 2007, 05:48 PM
Bjorn Jonsson This is awesome, I'll definitely try this out ... Nov 12 2007, 12:49 AM
ugordan QUOTE (Bjorn Jonsson @ Nov 12 2007, 01:49... Nov 12 2007, 07:46 AM
remcook They used filters from ground-based telescopes, so... Nov 15 2007, 10:58 AM
Bjorn Jonsson This is slightly off-topic but has anyone been abl... Jan 10 2008, 10:45 PM
ugordan Yeah, the TIFFs don't work for me either, it d... Jan 10 2008, 10:59 PM
elakdawalla Rest assured, ugordan, it's not lack of intere... Jan 11 2008, 12:08 AM
Bjorn Jonsson A similar situation in my case - lack of time so o... Jan 11 2008, 01:28 AM
ugordan Emily, I'm curious - why do you think the VIMS... Jan 11 2008, 07:29 PM
djellison >2 year old thread time warp.
Version 1 and 2 ... Jun 21 2010, 05:40 PM
ugordan Hmmm, did v3 ever work for you properly? Does it c... Jun 21 2010, 06:43 PM
djellison I don't think I ever tried V3 before today - s... Jun 21 2010, 09:05 PM
ugordan Here's a standalone version of the tool for ... Jul 4 2010, 04:51 PM
djellison RESULT
http://twitpic.com/23vggd Jul 10 2010, 05:42 AM
mhoward QUOTE (djellison @ Jul 9 2010, 10:42 PM) ... Jul 10 2010, 02:26 PM
machi My first larger work with VIMS spectral qubes. Tha... Apr 28 2011, 09:54 AM
ugordan Nice! I do have one question, though - if that... Apr 28 2011, 09:52 PM
machi I suppose, that it's southern hemisphere, beca... Apr 29 2011, 09:36 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 10:59 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|