IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Saturn from Galileo
Paolo
post Nov 24 2007, 10:41 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



I don't know whether this has ever been reported in the forum.
During E18, in December 1998, Galileo took some camera calibration pictures of Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. This is one of the clearest views of Saturn (untreated "raw" image). However, I cannot make out Uranus and Neptune from their raw image. I think they are somewhere between the cosmic rays and radiation blemishes...

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Nov 24 2007, 01:51 PM
Post #2


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



We discussed it at some point. I made a false color version of it.

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Nov 24 2007, 01:56 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Didn't you say that one's from C22? http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...ost&p=13606
Is there more than one calibration observation of Saturn?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Nov 24 2007, 02:47 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



QUOTE (ugordan @ Nov 24 2007, 02:56 PM) *
Didn't you say that one's from C22? http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...ost&p=13606
Is there more than one calibration observation of Saturn?


I checked and in fact there are others from C22. This is the label of my image, from E18
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Nov 24 2007, 04:12 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



It turns out Uranus was not difficult to find in E18 pictures, because they were taken while the camera was slewing.



I still can't find Neptune however

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Nov 24 2007, 04:40 PM
Post #6


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (ugordan @ Nov 24 2007, 01:56 PM) *
Didn't you say that one's from C22? http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...ost&p=13606
Is there more than one calibration observation of Saturn?


Yes. There are two sets. The C22 set is better though.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Nov 24 2007, 10:26 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Since we're at the topic of unremarkable Saturn sets, here's one showing the state of Cassini's narrow-angle camera after the Jupiter encounter:

Attached Image

Gamma-correct display version. Titan is the speck at left and appears much more red because the haze scattered blue light strongly - hence a mostly bluish halo around Saturn. This is AFAIK the first ever image of Cassini's ultimate target, taken on July 13th, 2001. The phase angle is similar to what can be observed from Earth.

As a comparison, an image taken 15 months later showing the haze is pretty much history:
Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Nov 24 2007, 10:28 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3231
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Remind me at the beginning of January to post some of the Cassini images of Jupiter from February of this year.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Nov 24 2007, 10:30 PM
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Nov 24 2007, 11:28 PM) *
Remind me at the beginning of January to post some of the Cassini images of Jupiter from February of this year.

Why not now? Hasn't a RGB set already been released - http://ciclops.org/view.php?id=2582?

When you compare the blue channel images from Feb 2007 and May 2004, it's amazing how much change is visible in Jupiter's belts and zones even at such low resolution:

At the left is the view of Jupiter at the time of New Horizons' flyby, while the 2004 image is more typical of what Cassini saw when it flied by the planet.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Nov 24 2007, 10:34 PM
Post #10


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3231
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Oh, you're right:

http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA08899

sorry, forgot about that. Though I will note that the smudge to the left of Jupiter is Ganymede and Europa. The smudge to the right of Jupiter is Io.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Nov 25 2007, 02:27 AM
Post #11


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



I re-did the image. The old version was done pre-crash, so I have no idea what I did before. The color is based on three near infrared wavelengths (which is all that Galileo took).


Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Nov 25 2007, 09:21 AM
Post #12


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



QUOTE (tedstryk @ Nov 25 2007, 03:27 AM) *
I re-did the image. The old version was done pre-crash, so I have no idea what I did before. The color is based on three near infrared wavelengths (which is all that Galileo took).


That's definitely better than E18, in fact
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Dec 24 2007, 12:30 AM
Post #13


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Here's the Cassini Jupiter 2007 set revisited:


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rlorenz
post Dec 24 2007, 02:51 AM
Post #14


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 610
Joined: 23-February 07
From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1764



QUOTE (tedstryk @ Nov 24 2007, 09:27 PM) *
I re-did the image. The old version was done pre-crash, so I have no idea what I did before. The color is based on three near infrared wavelengths (which is all that Galileo took).


Attached Image

Can you make Titan out ?

I remember seeing these when they were acquired (looking over the shoulder of
some Galileo people at LPL) but before released on PDS. I remember thinking they
might be interesting insofar as those would be the highest-phase-angle Near-IR
images ever acquired of Titan (at the time). Now eclipsed, so to speak, by Cassini,
although even then the photometry might be interesting re seasonal change....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Dec 25 2007, 07:09 PM
Post #15


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



I brought in in from some of the severely overexposed images. I may have used the set from the other Saturn- imaging orbit. I am in London now, so I am working completely from my jetlagged memory. I will check my notes when I get home.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th April 2024 - 01:31 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.