Mercury Flyby 1 |
![]() ![]() |
Mercury Flyby 1 |
Jan 13 2008, 02:50 PM
Post
#121
|
|
![]() Interplanetary Dumpster Diver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3420 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
| Guest_Zvezdichko_* |
Jan 13 2008, 03:10 PM
Post
#122
|
|
Guests |
![]() The same image slightly sharpened by me using ImageMagick, then I added some color. Now compare this to the old Mariner 10 image (approximately true color):
|
|
|
|
Jan 13 2008, 03:24 PM
Post
#123
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 776 Joined: 30-January 05 Member No.: 162 |
I am amazed at how much data we get on this first flyby. And note, it is the fastest one before orbit insertion. NASATV has an animation of the flyby replete with high resolution mosaics, and good WA color images.
|
|
|
|
Jan 13 2008, 07:41 PM
Post
#124
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2538 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Jan 13 2008, 10:28 PM
Post
#125
|
||
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1970 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 |
These are starting to get exciting. Sure, Ted. Is like to see an old friend, lost after elementary school... I made a resume with further processing of your picture (perhaps too heavy?), joined to original + VP tentative identifications: -------------------- - Marco -
|
|
|
|
||
Jan 13 2008, 10:45 PM
Post
#126
|
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 11548 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
|
Jan 13 2008, 11:50 PM
Post
#127
|
|
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3845 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Jan 13 2008, 11:56 PM
Post
#128
|
|
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3845 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 01:35 AM
Post
#129
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2538 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
Getting closer. This one really shows quite a bit of detail. Particularly clear near the terminator is the multi-ring basin Vivaldi:
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 01:38 AM
Post
#130
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 562 Joined: 29-December 05 From: NE Oh, USA Member No.: 627 |
Hello, Mercury, old friend....
good to be back...... Craig |
|
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 01:42 AM
Post
#131
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3146 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
This already fills a small gap in the Mariner 10 map! A small patch missed between high resolution frames. Also, this area was seen by Mariner 10 with very high sun - near the sub-solar point. The inbound mosaic will improve our existing maps enormously. Then the outbound mosaic will be mostly new territory.
Phil -------------------- Who dares, croaks (ribbit!)
|
|
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 01:56 AM
Post
#132
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2538 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
I think we may have already learned something new. The Mariner 10 stuff, from as far as I can tell, doesn't indicate that Vivaldi is superimposed on an older, larger impact basin.
EDIT: May not be an older basin. May actually be two impact craters to Vivaldi's southwest. -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 02:08 AM
Post
#133
|
|
![]() Interplanetary Dumpster Diver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3420 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
I processed it and colorized it based on my Mariner-10 work.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 03:48 AM
Post
#134
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2538 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 03:54 AM
Post
#135
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 352 Joined: 12-March 05 Member No.: 190 |
I am seeing numerous news reports that 700 GBytes of data will be returned by MESSENGER over the next 2 days. This, being an absurd value for reasons too numerous to count, is obviously a result of a bits/bytes or order of magnitude error. So what is the real amount that will be sent back over this flyby? I see that there are 2 banks of 8 Gbit solid state memory, the amount of data sent back on the Venus flyby was 6 GBITS at 600 images and there should be double that number on the Mercury flyby, the average bitrate at Mercury is 18 Kbit/s and the expected data return for 1 year after orbit insertion is only 135 Gbits................. an obvious actual value for this flyby is not jumping out at me....
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 30th July 2010 - 11:45 PM |
Unmannedspaceflight.com supports the IAU's International Year of Astronomy in the USA, the UK and around the world |
| |
The running costs of Unmannedspaceflight.com are provided by donations from visitors and members. Please use the PayPal button to contribute | ||
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or its operators |
||||