IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Poll On Spirit Plans From Now On
Poll On Spirit Plans From Now On
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 28
Guests cannot vote 
azstrummer
post Nov 16 2004, 09:08 PM
Post #1


Rover Driver
***

Group: Members
Posts: 109
Joined: 2-May 04
From: Litchfield Park, Arizona (Phoenix area)
Member No.: 71



Okay, I've posted a number of times indicating my desire to see Spirt get quickly to the top of the hills and peer over the other side and each time have been chided by Doug that I'm thinking more like a tourist than a scientist and I'd like to know if I'm the only one in this mindset.

Sol 310. Way past the expected. Gravy from here on out. So what should it be - tourist or geologist?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
djellison
post Nov 17 2004, 12:45 PM
Post #2


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (mook @ Nov 17 2004, 12:02 AM)
(Or in Spirit's case, the ~$410 million panorama).

Nope - $410m got you the first 90 days smile.gif The rest is from the Extended mission budget.

I maintain - that nice though the view from the summit will be, the science on the way is even better, and I would hate for them to ignore the science ( which is why they went ) just to get a better postcard.

Of Course - there is some science to be had from the view at the top of the hill - but the best science is the rocks they'd drive straight over if they were to go rambling without intention.

Of course - the manpower isnt in situ to have day after day of driving. Running on fewer 'drivers' and 'planners' it takes a sol or two to figure out a driving sequence, a sol or two that is best spent doing in situ science using the arm. So - drive for a day or two, spend a few days doing in situ science. Drive for another day, another couple of days doing in situ science, drive for another day or two, then have 3 in situ days of observation over a weekend. It takes longer to make sure they can park Spirit in an N facing direction at the end of a drive. A bad end-of-drive position now could kill spirit within 24 hrs, and that isnt an understatement.

There's 6 scientific instruments on each rover. (MB, APXS, MI, Mini TES, Pancam, Magnetic Targets) - only one, perhaps two will benefit from driving straight to the hill.

So - take things steady - do things carefully - look after these assets, priceless as they are, but dont rush to the top of a hill just to see what's there, chances are you'd trip and fall in the process.

Hare and Tortoise and all that.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- azstrummer   Poll On Spirit Plans From Now On   Nov 16 2004, 09:08 PM
- - YesRushGen   I voted for continuing and moderately stopping. Al...   Nov 16 2004, 10:30 PM
- - Sunspot   it looks like they've made some major progress...   Nov 16 2004, 10:46 PM
- - mook   Yes, Sunspot. Having chided NASA in these forums f...   Nov 17 2004, 12:02 AM
- - slinted   I would encourage anyone who voted for 'touris...   Nov 17 2004, 12:06 AM
- - OWW   I'm all for good science, but how many more ...   Nov 17 2004, 12:15 AM
- - slinted   QUOTE (ObsessedWithWorlds @ Nov 17 2004, 12:1...   Nov 17 2004, 01:19 AM
- - mook   The guy in the teleconference projects that it...   Nov 17 2004, 07:14 AM
- - djellison   QUOTE (mook @ Nov 17 2004, 12:02 AM)(Or in Sp...   Nov 17 2004, 12:45 PM
- - EckJerome   Hey strummer...looks like it's just you and me...   Nov 17 2004, 04:52 PM
- - azstrummer   Yep, and from the images today it appears there...   Nov 17 2004, 09:30 PM
- - OWW   What are they doing? Spirit is going downhill...   Nov 17 2004, 10:07 PM
- - mook   At a cursory glance, looks like they're trying...   Nov 18 2004, 12:33 AM
- - djellison   Yup - taking a route that essentially runs along t...   Nov 18 2004, 10:05 AM
- - OWW   And further down the hill we go: http://qt.explora...   Nov 18 2004, 10:20 PM
- - Sunspot   Still moving: Forward hazcam: http://qt.explorato...   Nov 18 2004, 10:27 PM
- - djellison   Well - going straight up west spur would have left...   Nov 18 2004, 10:50 PM
- - azstrummer   Somehow I doubt that the intent is truly to go dow...   Nov 19 2004, 03:36 PM
- - djellison   If they go straight up the ridge of the spur - the...   Nov 19 2004, 04:03 PM
- - Sunspot   http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/spirit/na...00P07...   Nov 19 2004, 08:06 PM
- - SFJCody   I think they're going to strike out across the...   Nov 19 2004, 08:17 PM
- - azstrummer   I sent off an email today to the comments address ...   Nov 19 2004, 09:00 PM
- - OWW   QUOTE (Sunspot @ Nov 19 2004, 08:06 PM)It loo...   Nov 19 2004, 09:13 PM
- - Sunspot   ...ahhhhhhh yes, so they are, didnt see this hazca...   Nov 19 2004, 11:46 PM
- - Pando   Here's my humble attempt at trying to figure o...   Nov 20 2004, 12:57 AM
- - alan   I think Spirit has been heading northeast. My es...   Nov 20 2004, 06:43 AM
- - OWW   Pando, that is a beautiful map. Would you be so ki...   Nov 20 2004, 04:00 PM
- - alan   OK, they cliimbed the hill between your gray areas...   Nov 20 2004, 04:37 PM
- - alan   Heading toward the gap between Clark and Husband H...   Nov 21 2004, 05:37 PM
- - tedstryk   The gap between the hills would make a great place...   Nov 21 2004, 11:32 PM
- - Pando   Here is an updated map. Spirit is currently close ...   Nov 22 2004, 10:55 PM
- - Pando   Here is a 3-d map from a different perspective:   Nov 23 2004, 08:18 PM
- - djellison   Excellent view that last one - the navcam images m...   Nov 23 2004, 09:09 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 05:56 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.