IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Wielding a Cost-Cutting Ax, and Often, at NASA, NYT Article on Alan Stern
Greg Hullender
post Jan 1 2008, 10:14 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1010
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



I saw this in today's New York Times.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/01/science/...ml?pagewanted=1

Here are some selected bits:

In his eight months on the job, the director, S. Alan Stern, has turned back almost a half-dozen requests for more money from projects experiencing cost overruns, he said.

NASA devotes about $5.4 billion a year to its science program, divided among specialties like astrophysics, earth science and planetary exploration. To finance President Bush’s exploration initiative to return humans to the Moon, while also financing space shuttle operations and a shuttle replacement out of the agency’s approximately $16 billion annual budget, science program money is being held to about a 1 percent increase per year for four years.

His hard line on cost overruns has been one of the first signs of change noticed by researchers and many outsiders. So far, he said, his team has rolled back cost overruns in almost a half-dozen projects, sending out word that this is now standard procedure.

“I admire what he’s doing,” said Dr. Lennard A. Fisk, professor of space science at the University of Michigan and chairman of the Space Studies Board at the National Academy of Sciences. Dr. Fisk, who headed NASA’s science directorate in the 1980s, said true reform required a cultural change at the agency in how it runs programs. And a director must be consistent, he said, to convince people of the seriousness of the effort.

“In the beginning, he has to be hard-nosed with everybody,” Dr. Fisk said. “The first one he blinks on could be a problem. He has to maintain his credibility.”

“We’re just not walking around swinging the ax,” Dr. Stern said. “We have a very new team that, I hope, is changing the way we do business.”

--

I thought the article was quite good, and it seems quite positive as well. I continue to hope that this sort of publicity will help increase support for unmanned space flight in general, just by making people feel their money is being well-spent. Here's to you, Alan!

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jan 1 2008, 10:43 PM
Post #2


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13705
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I'm reminded of a chat I had with David Southwood at ESOC on the night of the Rosetta flyby. We were walking through the control rooms and he explained that it's fantastic to have VEX, MEX, Cluster, XMM, Integral, SOHO, Ulysses all deep into or about to start extended missions - but it makes it really hard to fund the new stuff they want to do. All that lot combines is eating up actually, quite a lot of cash.

I wouldn't do Alan's job for all the money in the world. Brave guy.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jan 1 2008, 10:56 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 6947
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



No lie. Administering public funds in a high-visibilty environment with a ton of stakeholders definitely isn't about making friends...it's about making the best possible compromises happen...now go ahead & define "best possible compromises" to everyone's satisfaction, I dare you! sad.gif Been in some project meetings that damn near came to blows...


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th July 2014 - 02:37 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.