My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
1999CG9, A chip off the Moon |
Jan 26 2008, 09:20 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 117 Joined: 7-December 06 From: Sheffield UK Member No.: 1462 |
Does anyone know if asteroid 1999CG9 was ever confirmed as a rogue piece of the Moon knocked off by a large impact?
http://www.klet.org/html/1999cg9.html It would be fascinating to try and match 1999CG9's composition with the lunar surface to try and identify its parent crater or basin. A study of the asteroid's orbital stability would also yield important clues as to how long it has been in solar orbit, and therefore its likely lunar originating site. I've contacted the people involved in the original identification of 1999CG9 as likely of lunar origins but have had no reply. -------------------- It's a funny old world - A man's lucky if he gets out of it alive. - W.C. Fields.
|
|
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 05:35 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 544 Joined: 17-November 05 From: Oklahoma Member No.: 557 |
It has not been confirmed, and it is unlikely to be anytime soon. Sorry.
There were a total of 47 observations back in 1999, spanning 24 days, 45 of which were good enough to establish a reasonably accurate orbit. Said observations were not good enough to establish a rotation period. There were no successful spectroscopic observations, assuming any were even attemped. This info comes from here . By the time the orbit was computed, it was already dimmer than 19th magnitude. The next close approach will be in the latter part of August, 2010, the first since '99. It will get just barely brighter than 21st magnitude, so spectroscopic observations will be challenging. If it turns out to be C type, then it didn't come from the moon. Signs of water - probably not from the moon, either. Anything else and it might be from the moon. As always, a sample return is really required to nail it. Or maybe a sophisticated lander. Back in '99, this discovery started a bit of a dust up among certain factions of the UFO and conspiracy groups. There was even some talk about a "Vatican coverup", whatever that was about. Some of these dear souls probably were contacting the discoverers, which may have led to their reluctance to get back to you, not knowing who you were. |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 05:55 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 117 Joined: 7-December 06 From: Sheffield UK Member No.: 1462 |
Thanks for your help.
I really hope someone is planning some more observations in August 2010. I'd love to write a piece on it! -------------------- It's a funny old world - A man's lucky if he gets out of it alive. - W.C. Fields.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 02:56 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|