My Assistant
Spy Satellite to Hit Earth by late February to March |
| Guest_Bobby_* |
Jan 27 2008, 04:47 AM
Post
#101
|
|
Guests |
Just read at MSNBC that a large U.S. spy satellite will hit Earth by the end of February or early March.
Better keep our hard hats ready??? Here is the article: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22857051/ |
|
|
|
![]() |
Mar 31 2008, 03:43 AM
Post
#102
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 172 Joined: 17-March 06 Member No.: 709 |
One aspect of the USA-193 episode that has not been discussed is the need for
secrecy regarding its demise. As some of you know, stamping a program with the "CLASSIFIED" label can hide a multitude of sins. Of course, I am not in favor of revealing details of USA-193's payload. However, the details of what caused USA-193 to arrive DOA in orbit (according to the Space rumor mill) should be discussed. When MPL or MCO disappear at Mars, the media is all over the story, as well they should be. However, when USA-193 becomes the latest space recon SNAFU, barely a peep is heard. Billions are invested in NRO's satellites, but the Military "good-ole-boys" network have the perfect rip-off scheme. They get ALL aspects of an NRO recon satellite classified, so that they get their billions of dollars regardless of whether the satellite works or not. All that they have to say when the media come calling with questions is one word - "Classified." Now whether USA-193's demise was caused by the malfunction of its radio, guidance system, power system, or propulsion system, an Anomaly Review Board could be appointed with the directive to release its findings publicly. This could be done without compromising national security and without revealing the nature of the payload. As with ITAR, I am against ALL unnecessary government secrecy. It costs us money and enables contractors to pad their fees and build shoddy satellites. Oversight is the only means to keep this business honest. Another Phil |
|
|
|
Bobby Spy Satellite to Hit Earth by late February to March Jan 27 2008, 04:47 AM
djellison To be honest, if you look at some of the really go... Feb 27 2008, 07:59 AM
Stu That's a great shame Doug, I hadn't realis... Feb 27 2008, 08:17 AM
djellison Here's one example : http://www.nasa.gov/cente... Feb 27 2008, 08:49 AM
AndyG Interesting - so it might be worth returning bits ... Feb 27 2008, 10:19 AM
djellison They already have - indeed, I've seen Hubble s... Feb 27 2008, 10:35 AM
edstrick A better intermediate term disposal solution for h... Feb 27 2008, 12:01 PM
nprev Jim, what's a CMG? Feb 27 2008, 12:39 PM
tasp {Psst: Control moment gyro} Feb 27 2008, 01:07 PM
nprev QUOTE (tasp @ Feb 27 2008, 05:07 AM) {Pss... Feb 27 2008, 07:42 PM
ilbasso And besides, it's bad luck to break a mirror. Feb 27 2008, 04:01 PM
ElkGroveDan Does anyone have a link to a map of the debris orb... Feb 28 2008, 03:03 AM
nprev Was it kind of slow compared to normal meteors? Th... Feb 28 2008, 03:26 AM
ElkGroveDan Slow, and quite bluish in color with a much longer... Feb 28 2008, 03:43 AM
mchan I saw this too from South Bay. I had just finishe... Feb 28 2008, 04:47 AM
nprev Boy howdy, and I can't say for certain, but th... Feb 28 2008, 05:15 AM
mchan Looking on a map, the direction to the fireball fr... Feb 28 2008, 06:06 AM
ElkGroveDan I agree. That would have put the ground track bet... Feb 28 2008, 07:17 AM
Bill Harris Wouldn't it be ironic of a large piece of debr... Mar 1 2008, 02:27 PM
rlorenz QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Mar 1 2008, 09:27 AM... Mar 2 2008, 11:34 AM
djellison I'm not aware of any launches actually FROM EA... Mar 1 2008, 03:17 PM
nprev Unless you count Pegasus or perhaps the X-15 progr... Mar 1 2008, 03:26 PM
Bill Harris QUOTE Vandenberg AFB is around 130 miles west of t... Mar 2 2008, 02:29 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 04:06 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|