My Assistant
Gully formation by dry debris?, Pelletier:"Recent bright gully deposits on Mars: Wet or dry flow?& |
Mar 1 2008, 05:18 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 646 Joined: 23-December 05 From: Forest of Dean Member No.: 617 |
New work (Pelletier, McEwen, Kolb and Kirk; 'Geology', March 2008) apparently suggests dry debris is a more likely candidate for producing gullies of the sort observed by HiRISE.
This seems to me a more naturally "Occam-friendly" explanation than convoluted scenarios involving frozen aquifers with ice plugs that burst from time to time. What do the experts make of it? (Edit: sorry for the mangled topic title, BTW; I'd blame the software tools, but I know what that'd make me -------------------- --
Viva software libre! |
|
|
|
![]() |
Aug 26 2008, 08:19 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 402 Joined: 5-January 07 From: Manchester England Member No.: 1563 |
Personally ( and probably this is a bit weasel of me but even so..) I think conditions on mars have varied enough for both wet, damp, ever so slightly damp, and totally dry flows to have happened, although perhaps with a strong bias to the dry end of things. It just nags me that the issue keeps coming back up and being chewed over and none of us ever seem convinced enough by evidence one way or the other to reach a general consensus.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
imipak Gully formation by dry debris? Mar 1 2008, 05:18 PM
nprev Sounds plausible, but the trigger mechanism for su... Mar 1 2008, 05:35 PM
JonClarke QUOTE (imipak @ Mar 1 2008, 05:18 PM) New... Mar 2 2008, 06:03 AM
djellison QUOTE (JonClarke @ Mar 2 2008, 06:03 AM) ... Mar 2 2008, 08:33 AM
JonClarke QUOTE (djellison @ Mar 2 2008, 09:33 AM) ... Mar 2 2008, 09:57 AM
djellison So 'it looks like' then - and to be fair, ... Mar 2 2008, 10:39 AM
mcaplinger QUOTE (djellison @ Mar 2 2008, 02:39 AM) ... Mar 2 2008, 03:48 PM
JonClarke QUOTE (djellison @ Mar 2 2008, 10:39 AM) ... Mar 2 2008, 09:07 PM
djellison QUOTE (JonClarke @ Mar 2 2008, 09:07 PM) ... Mar 2 2008, 10:16 PM
mcaplinger QUOTE (djellison @ Mar 2 2008, 02:16 PM) ... Mar 3 2008, 04:33 AM
ElkGroveDan QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Mar 2 2008, 08:33 PM)... Mar 3 2008, 04:58 AM
nprev If there is in fact water involved here; I would t... Mar 3 2008, 02:57 AM
Stephen Realistically, barring some serendipitious snapsho... Mar 3 2008, 08:04 AM
dburt QUOTE (imipak @ Mar 1 2008, 10:18 AM) New... Mar 3 2008, 09:14 PM
centsworth_II QUOTE (dburt @ Mar 3 2008, 04:14 PM) Good... Mar 4 2008, 07:41 AM
imipak Thanks everyone, I thought there'd be some int... Mar 4 2008, 11:36 AM
jamescanvin QUOTE (imipak @ Mar 4 2008, 11:36 AM) On ... Mar 4 2008, 01:09 PM

imipak QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Mar 4 2008, 01:09 PM... Mar 4 2008, 09:03 PM
SickNick QUOTE (imipak @ Mar 4 2008, 09:36 PM) Tha... Jun 8 2008, 10:02 AM
Juramike space.com article references recent PNAS article. ... Aug 26 2008, 03:51 AM
marsbug As important as the question of water on present d... Aug 26 2008, 09:41 AM
Juramike (no offense taken...)
I'm sure the pendulum o... Aug 26 2008, 12:10 PM
stevesliva QUOTE (Juramike @ Aug 26 2008, 08:10 AM) ... Aug 26 2008, 05:23 PM
Juramike Head et al. PNAS (2008) Early edition (August 25, ... Aug 26 2008, 09:58 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 04:31 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|