IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Landing Site
djellison
post Apr 27 2008, 09:09 AM
Post #76


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



It lands W to E because, looking at Mars, it flys left to right. Once you figure that Phoenix is ahead of Mars, then the geometry becomes self evident to be honest.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Apr 27 2008, 05:03 PM
Post #77


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Hmmm... this could be interesting, or it might be nothing.

Was perusing the images listed in Emily's Blog posting re HiRISE images of the landing site, and whilst wandering over PSP_006785_2485 I found this...

Attached Image


... and the colour version of a neighbouring area looks like this...

Attached Image


Anyone else think they look like the "geyser"-type features seen down near the south pole..? Could Phoenix land near... no, that would be too much to ask for, wouldn't it..? wink.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Apr 27 2008, 06:56 PM
Post #78


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



Good eye Stu.

Imagine images of a geyser plume on the horizon. Maybe it's not too late to add one to Rui's contest...


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Apr 27 2008, 07:27 PM
Post #79


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I'd have thought they'd happen during the spring, when the place is warming up and the ice retreating. Phoenix is arriving when all the action, I'd have thought, would be over

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Apr 27 2008, 07:35 PM
Post #80


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



QUOTE (djellison @ Apr 27 2008, 08:27 PM) *
I'd have thought they'd happen during the spring, when the place is warming up and the ice retreating. Phoenix is arriving when all the action, I'd have thought, would be over

Doug


I thought that too... but there could be some interesting material on the surface, and reachable with the instruments, if Phoenix were to land close to one of these vents, even if it's inactive...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Apr 27 2008, 10:46 PM
Post #81


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



OK fine. No picture then. mad.gif I remember when folks around here had vision and imagination wink.gif

I may do the picture anyway.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Apr 27 2008, 11:48 PM
Post #82


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8791
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Aah, c'mon. Dan...they do.

Speaking as one of the judges for Rui's contest, would love to see a geyser on the horizon in one of the entries (because, frankly, who the hell knows? We don't have a bleeding clue about the rate of thermal inertia for the terrain, fooling ourselves if we think so, even more so if we assume it's uniform...)


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SpaceListener
post Apr 28 2008, 02:37 AM
Post #83


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 279
Joined: 19-August 07
Member No.: 3299



Stu, 1 cm, impossible, then closer to 1 meter is the most likely. Thanks to Nep, Stu and The other Doug.

The other thing, about after interpreting the picture, what I was thinking that the surface must be somewhat wet (ending the spring and some water might have sublimated?? and the other part might have drought into the surface??). The surface aspect is smooth probably by the ice weight and by the water erosion and the surface have no white color, then no snow??. This contradicts to Planetary blog (Phoenix on Course for Mars Landing) which says that the zone landing surface will be covered by ice.
QUOTE
"Our landing area has the largest concentration of ice on Mars outside of the polar caps. If you want to search for a habitable zone in the arctic permafrost, then this is the place to go," said Peter Smith, principal investigator for the mission, at the University of Arizona, Tucson.

ohmy.gif

Finally, I am preoccupied about the success of landing since the ellipse landing is so big (the landing area is an ellipse about 100 kilometers (62 miles) by 19 kilometers (12 miles)). Indeed, according to the Phonix Web page says:
QUOTE
the sophisticated landing system on Phoenix allows the spacecraft to touch down within 10 km (6.2 miles) of the targeted landing area.

rolleyes.gif

On the other hand, I have heard that the intelligent discrimination among boulders was deactivated in order to avoid a major complication in deciding rightly the landing site. Although I have found a quote from Phoenix's Arizona's Web which says:
QUOTE
Besides, the Phoenix's navigation system is capable of detecting and avoiding hazards on the surface of Mars.

ohmy.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Apr 28 2008, 07:23 AM
Post #84


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (SpaceListener @ Apr 28 2008, 03:37 AM) *
I was thinking that the surface must be somewhat wet


What makes you think that? The temperatures and pressures involved render liquid water a very very transient phenomenon, with sublimation far and away the dominant process.

And the resolution is not a 'more likely' situation - it's not an interpretive issue. Each pixel IS 25cm.

The blog doesn't say it'll be covered with ice. It say there is ice there. Which there is - in the soil. Not on it. In it.

I think the two articles you've seen citing landing accuracy are out of date. An active, guided entry was an initial plan for Phoenix, but it was cancelled to save money.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Apr 28 2008, 09:51 AM
Post #85


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



QUOTE (ElkGroveDan @ Apr 27 2008, 07:56 PM) *
Maybe it's not too late to add one to Rui's contest...


Well...there's only 20 days left...and I already have the prizes with me...
those signed posters are indeed a beauty... smile.gif
I'll try to post an image from one of them already in place at spacEurope's HQ wink.gif

EDITED: Signed posters, pretty t-shirts and 15 days to go...


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 05:22 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.