My Assistant
WMAP third data release, precision cosmology and cosmic coincidences |
Mar 13 2008, 02:16 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 |
Nobody highlighted it, but the 5-year WMAP results were published on March,07 and results are stunning:
I long awaited this moment and, looking to results, we definitely entered in the "precision cosmology" age... (frankly, this goes well behind my hopes to see such accomplishments in my lifetime! Between the many foundamental determinations and refinements (which I hope will be discussed here), the most impressive result in terms of precision is the universe age, now known with less than 1% uncertain after joining WMAP estimation with other independent measurements: t0 = 13.73 + 0.12 Gyr It seems that, at this point, we know the age of universe with a relative precision comparable to Solar system age [from Wikipedia]: tss = 4.53 to 4.58 Gy Now, about these two ages, after previous WMAP release I was already disappointed by an intriguing coincidence, now confirmed by new estimation: t0 / tss = 3.014 + 0,043 So, within uncertain range, the ratio "is" exactly 3! I know that, to many, this is only a coincidence. Otherwise it would require that we live in a very special moment...and place! Even if a little bit mistic, this approach isn't new in the cosmology: think about anthropic principle and large numbers coincidences! Anybody wants to accept such provocation? -------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
|
|
|
dilo WMAP third data release Mar 13 2008, 02:16 AM
centsworth_II QUOTE (dilo @ Mar 12 2008, 10:16 PM) So, ... Mar 13 2008, 02:40 AM
dilo Centsworth, your considerations are reasonable; ho... Mar 13 2008, 02:28 PM
centsworth_II To make your ratio special, either we would need t... Mar 13 2008, 03:42 PM
PhilCo126 Don't forget the Universe exists because we ob... Mar 13 2008, 05:16 PM
centsworth_II It certainly exists as a concept in the human mind... Mar 13 2008, 06:13 PM
dilo Good anthropic points...
QUOTE (centsworth_II ... Mar 13 2008, 06:42 PM
centsworth_II QUOTE (dilo @ Mar 13 2008, 02:42 PM) ...I... Mar 13 2008, 07:52 PM

dilo This is the reason why I said in my first post ... Mar 14 2008, 04:08 AM
djellison QUOTE (dilo @ Mar 13 2008, 06:42 PM) I wa... Mar 14 2008, 03:21 PM
centsworth_II Another thing to look at:
Before the evolution of... Mar 14 2008, 05:33 AM
dilo ...sure, unless you believe that asteroid are pilo... Mar 14 2008, 02:43 PM
ngunn 230 million years ago the ratio was exactly pi, bu... Mar 14 2008, 03:51 PM
centsworth_II And concerning the +/-.043 error for the ratio:
Th... Mar 14 2008, 03:57 PM
JRehling I also noticed this ratio. But I also recall when ... Mar 14 2008, 06:46 PM
dilo OK, last two posts almost convinced me...
I feel l... Mar 14 2008, 10:12 PM
nprev Just a cautionary note--WE invented numbers and ma... Mar 14 2008, 07:07 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 11:49 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|