IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Spacecraft and cars, Thrifty and efficient vs. wasteful and risky
karolp
post May 9 2008, 12:52 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 14-April 06
From: Berlin
Member No.: 744



I was just thinking: if we buy an expensive car, we do not use it to drive to one destination and then throw it away. Also, car companies do not develop a brand new car for each new customer. I guess a large portion of the cost involved in each mission (and hence a limiting factor to the number of missions we are able to send there) is not launch or the materials but actually developing the spacecraft itself. We have already started recycling - Stardust and Deep Impact are bound to new destinations and meanwhile ESA sent identical spacecraft to Venus and Mars (MEX and Venus Express). What if instead of dumping scarce funds into starting from scratch each time, we actually reused designs and developed derivatives? Consider the following possibilities:

- sending 2 more MERs to other destinations on Mars, carefully selected based on MRO photos (which did not exist yet when Oppy and Spirit arrived), possibly outfitted with new instruments and protective mechanisms based on what we learnt using the first two :-)
- sending a MER or a Sojourner to Phobos
- adapting the MER design for lunar rover missions
- using existing Mars spacecraft designs for Mars sample return mission

What do you think?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 07:19 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.