IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
ExoMars rover demonstrator
imipak
post May 15 2008, 11:57 AM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 643
Joined: 23-December 05
From: Forest of Dean
Member No.: 617



The BBC has a story on the new ExoMars rover technology demonstrator. "The MDA prototype can be viewed much like a car without its body. What you see in these pictures from a recent test session is essentially an undercarriage" -- which is good, because it's clearly not designed to look good wink.gif


--------------------
--
Viva software libre!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post May 15 2008, 12:12 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2591
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



Full in-line quote removed.

We'll have to set up a poll one day to decide which will be the ugliest : ExoMars or MSL wink.gif
BTW, your link's not working


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post May 15 2008, 01:27 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2153
Joined: 9-February 04
From: UK
Member No.: 16



Your link seems to be broken, try:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7397951.stm


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post May 15 2008, 01:55 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2591
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



Wouah! I first though it was HUGE... until I sew the 2nd picture.
She looks very "primitive" at this stage


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post May 15 2008, 03:39 PM
Post #5


Bloggette par Excellence
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4259
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Is this essentially equivalent to the "scarecrow" mobility system model for MSL?

I agree it does look rather primitive...

--Emily


--------------------
My blog - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post May 15 2008, 04:52 PM
Post #6


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13600
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Yeah - there's another one the same called Bridget that was here in Leicester a few weeks ago. I was in Cambridge launching a balloon at the time, but basically it's a joystick-it rover.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lyford
post May 15 2008, 08:04 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1260
Joined: 18-December 04
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 124



Curious that the wheels are joined to the axels on the outside vs. the JPL way....

Is this the design that will be on the final article? Anybody hazard a reason as why this way would be preferred?


--------------------
Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
peter59
post Oct 17 2008, 06:27 PM
Post #8


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 527
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Poland
Member No.: 299



ESA to Delay Mars Rover Mission
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/0810...-marsrover.html
PARIS — European Space Agency (ESA) governments tentatively have agreed to delay the launch of Europe's first-ever Mars rover by a little more than two years, to 2016, as part of a broader effort to rein in project costs and seek deeper cooperation with NASA and the Russian space agency, European government officials said.


--------------------
Free software for planetary science (including Cassini Image Viewer).
http://members.tripod.com/petermasek/marinerall.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gpurcell
post Oct 17 2008, 07:46 PM
Post #9


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 214
Joined: 21-December 04
Member No.: 127



I've got a very bad feeling about this delay...the cost cap at $1B Euro is going to be a real challenge and I just don't see how NASA will have the funds to chip in additional money. Slipping from 11 to 13 to 16 sure seems like kicking the ball down the road every time real money needs to be spent on it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Oct 17 2008, 08:47 PM
Post #10


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5548
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



I just have a gut feeling this rover will never reach Mars. Sorry, I just do. sad.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Oct 17 2008, 09:04 PM
Post #11


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13600
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Totally agree. It's as far off now as it was when first thought of.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
imipak
post Oct 17 2008, 10:26 PM
Post #12


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 643
Joined: 23-December 05
From: Forest of Dean
Member No.: 617



From the article it seems that the problem is budget rather than engineering. The quoted costs look comparable to the MER, - the same magnitude, at least, allowing a hand-waving +/- 30% for only one rover, inflation, and the absence of the previous experience with Mars landers available to JPL when Athena kicked off. My uninformed guess would therefore be that if it doesn't fly in 2016, we'll be into the 2020s before there's a realistic hope for an ESA Mars rover (and indeed any soft-lander.) The cost of putting tin on Mars is unlikely to fall, after all.

Dang sad.gif

BTW, for some reason I completely missed the follow-on comments after originally posting the BBC story; sorry for the busticated link back in May.


--------------------
--
Viva software libre!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mars loon
post Oct 18 2008, 04:34 PM
Post #13


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: 19-March 05
From: Princeton, NJ, USA
Member No.: 212



sadly, I also agree that with this new delay, the likelihood of this mission launching has greatly decreased. If I recall correctly, the original proposal was for a 2009 launch.

more details here at this recent AWST online article also featured in a recent issue:
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/sto.../aw100608p2.xml

ken
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post Oct 20 2008, 11:41 AM
Post #14





Guests






Indeed delayed by 2 years... nothing yet on the ESA.int website ?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7677349.stm
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mariner9
post Oct 21 2008, 03:54 PM
Post #15


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 216
Joined: 13-October 05
Member No.: 528



This also comes shortly after the other large planetary mission for the next decade, Bepi-Colombo, had a large cost increase that almost resulted in cancelation.

That mission had been studied and designed for over a decade. Compare that to Exo-Mars, which has been on a very fast track in EAS for the last few years. Budget estimates on Exo-Mars have more than doubled in the last three years, from less than 600 million to 1.2 billion Euros.

I'm not surprised someone in the European Union finally said 'stop' to the upward spiral.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2014 - 05:24 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.