My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
First day, Post-EDL |
May 26 2008, 02:31 PM
Post
#61
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 242 Joined: 21-December 04 Member No.: 127 |
|
|
|
|
| Guest_Zvezdichko_* |
May 26 2008, 02:32 PM
Post
#62
|
|
Guests |
there may be some interesting targets in the area that is not yet seen
|
|
|
|
May 26 2008, 02:46 PM
Post
#63
|
|
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
Very true... who knows what interesting things are waiting to be seen to Phoenix's sides, or behind it? I wonder if we'll be treated to any new images at the media briefing later today? (7pm British Summer Time)
Fantastic night last night, thanks to everyone who made it so special. Special "Thanks, and well done!"s to Doug and Emily for all their hard work. Very proud of you both. And a huge night for UMSF too. Welcome to all our new members! -------------------- |
|
|
|
May 26 2008, 02:52 PM
Post
#64
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 4280 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
When the SSI mast is/was expected to be extended?
|
|
|
|
May 26 2008, 02:57 PM
Post
#65
|
|
![]() Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Radar was enabled after parachute deployment and heatshield jettison. I believe the parachute timing was made using IMU delta-V integration. Yes, that's what they said last night. IMU = Inertial Measurement Unit. It was either Barry Goldstein or Ed Sedivy who remarked that it seemed that the radar came on late but when he checked back with the guys at LockMart, they said it was within the normal range -- it was just time stretching out in their excitement Thanks all for your kind words and for sticking with me through the various attacks on the website and ustream channel! --Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
|
May 26 2008, 02:57 PM
Post
#66
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1089 Joined: 19-February 05 From: Close to Meudon Observatory in France Member No.: 172 |
|
|
|
|
| Guest_Zvezdichko_* |
May 26 2008, 03:05 PM
Post
#67
|
|
Guests |
Whendo we expect to see the LIDAR in action?
|
|
|
|
May 26 2008, 03:07 PM
Post
#68
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 24 Joined: 17-April 05 Member No.: 236 |
I'd have to echo Emily's words from her blog: please consider joining the Planetary Society!
Yes, that's what they said last night. IMU = Inertial Measurement Unit.
It was either Barry Goldstein or Ed Sedivy who remarked that it seemed that the radar came on late but when he checked back with the guys at LockMart, they said it was within the normal range -- it was just time stretching out in their excitement Thanks all for your kind words and for sticking with me through the various attacks on the website and ustream channel! --Emily |
|
|
|
May 26 2008, 03:11 PM
Post
#69
|
|||
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
Just wondering about something, thoughts appreciated...
In her excellent report on last night, Emily advises that this HiRISE image is, apparrently, dead centre on the landing zone... I've just been looking at it with IAS Viewer and found this at 1:1 scale... ... which looks like this if you zoom in on it x2... Could that be a jagged rock we're mistaking for the backshell..? -------------------- |
||
|
|
|||
May 26 2008, 03:12 PM
Post
#70
|
|
![]() Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 16 Joined: 24-March 08 From: Godalming, Surrey, UK Member No.: 4074 |
Hi, all. First post here, though I've been following the site for a few months now.
Thank you to everyone who made last night such a great time - all good fun switching between Mars Live, Nasa TV, and Emily's TV. I do have one question about the image showing the horizon: given that Phoenix is tilted at a quarter degree, doesn't that mean it's sitting on a hill? The horizon looks to be tilted by several degrees there. David |
|
|
|
May 26 2008, 03:16 PM
Post
#71
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 33 Joined: 5-October 06 Member No.: 1223 |
full inline quote removed
I take it thats pre-landing HiRISE imaging Stu? |
|
|
|
May 26 2008, 03:18 PM
Post
#72
|
|
![]() Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Just want to comment here that it was slinted who identified that image. (Thanks, slinted, for all the helpful links in the chat channel.)
--Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
|
May 26 2008, 03:19 PM
Post
#73
|
|
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
Yep, no post-landing HiRISE images have been released yet, as far as I know...
-------------------- |
|
|
|
May 26 2008, 03:25 PM
Post
#74
|
|
|
Merciless Robot ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 8789 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
It was either Barry Goldstein or Ed Sedivy who remarked that it seemed that the radar came on late but when he checked back with the guys at LockMart, they said it was within the normal range -- it was just time stretching out in their excitement Gordan, thanks for the illumination, and Emily, thanks for the confirmation. Hate to critique something that worked...great!!!...but given the extreme variability of the density of the upper atmosphere of Mars it seems that this technique could be refined a bit better. One approach that might be cost-effective and not incur a mass penalty or add additional physical complexity would be to add a reference Martian geoid (basically a mathematical model of Mars' 'sea level' surface if it were spherical/slightly oblate and featureless) to the navigation system as a model for estimated absolute altitude based on IMU data, which can also provide distance & vector relative to such a geoid traveled since entry. An "and-gate" approach to parachute cueing might provide better targeting accuracy, provided that the inputs have the required redundancy. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
|
May 26 2008, 03:34 PM
Post
#75
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14445 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th October 2024 - 11:27 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|