My Assistant
Phoenix EDL architecture and performance |
May 26 2008, 08:24 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 614 Joined: 23-February 07 From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD Member No.: 1764 |
Following from earlier thread's discussions on the late parachute deployment, there is a
pretty up-to-date and comprehensive discussion of Phoenix's EDL architecture from last year's planetary probe workshop (this year's is in Atlanta next month - www.planetaryprobe.org) http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntr..._2008012907.pdf Interestingly, they were going to use rather more sophisticated lifting entry, but it got descoped. |
|
|
|
![]() |
May 27 2008, 03:33 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Merciless Robot ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 8791 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
I hope it was. Phoenix actually had two IMUs, and generally the difference between an IMU (inertial measurement unit) and an INU (inertial navigation unit) is that the latter has some brains, but the former does not. Phoenix's IMUs were expected and allowed to expire from cold last night.
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
|
May 27 2008, 08:12 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 57 Joined: 6-September 07 From: Netherlands Member No.: 3683 |
Phoenix's IMUs were expected and allowed to expire from cold last night. So there is no way of knowing if we get towed away when we landed in a "no parking" zone. That rules out using the accelerometers in them as crude seismometers, that is if the dampening factor of the units is 0 or 0.707. I suppose that was the case since it makes it easier to measure arbitrary motions. Anyone has more info on these units? -------------------- Error: Life.sys corrupted
( R )eflect, ( R )epend, or ( R )eboot? |
|
|
|
rlorenz Phoenix EDL architecture and performance May 26 2008, 08:24 PM
Jon S. Berndt unnecessary quoting deleted [oops. sorry. JB]
QUOT... May 27 2008, 02:50 AM
dvandorn I would imagine that vehicle attitude information ... May 27 2008, 03:23 AM

nprev QUOTE (Skyrunner @ May 27 2008, 12:12 AM)... May 27 2008, 10:07 AM
surreyguy QUOTE (nprev @ May 27 2008, 04:33 AM) all... May 27 2008, 01:44 PM
nprev Indeed!
Seriously, though, with respect to ... May 28 2008, 01:16 AM
kenny I suspect this Q has probably been answered somewh... May 28 2008, 05:57 PM
bcory QUOTE (kenny @ May 28 2008, 01:57 PM) I s... May 28 2008, 06:01 PM
djellison http://www.msss.com/msl/mardi/news/12Nov07/index.h... May 28 2008, 06:00 PM
kenny Thank you, both.... May 28 2008, 08:19 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 05:29 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|