IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Pillinger's view
SFJCody
post May 28 2008, 09:26 AM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 8-February 04
From: Arabia Terra
Member No.: 12



Usual stuff. Mentions some uncertainty over the future of ExoMars (delay to 2015?).
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/20...paceexploration
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
djellison
post May 29 2008, 03:41 PM
Post #2


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I'd want to see a different engineering philosophy for a Beagle 2.1 I'm sure that it could be done within the volume and mass budget that B2 had, but it would be a whole lot easier at the 100kg-all-up level. That, I would put money into.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulM
post May 29 2008, 06:14 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 206
Joined: 15-August 07
From: Shrewsbury, Shropshire
Member No.: 3233



QUOTE (djellison @ May 29 2008, 04:41 PM) *
I'd want to see a different engineering philosophy for a Beagle 2.1 I'm sure that it could be done within the volume and mass budget that B2 had, but it would be a whole lot easier at the 100kg-all-up level. That, I would put money into.

Doug


I had the great privilege of working with some of the Beagle 2 hardware designers between Beagle 2's launch and landing on Mars. They were some of the best engineers that I have every worked with.

I told one of these engineers that Spirit would send out beeps of varying frequencies during EDL and that each of these beeps would indicate what state Spirit was in. For example one frequency might indicate that the parachute had been deployed and another that the airbags had inflated. The engineer told me that due to weight restrictions Beagle 2 could transmit no telemetry during EDL.

I mentioned to the engineer that the report on the loss of the Mars Polar Lander (MPL) had said that whilst the lack of telemetry during EDL was irelevant to whether MPL worked or not it was important in getting MPL's sucessors down safely to Mars. The engineer told me that the reports recommendation that telemetry be transmitted during EDL had been mentioned at a Beagle 2 meeting but that weight restrictions had simply made this impossible. In any case there was no possibility of another £25 million being found for Beagle 3.

I think that the weight restrictions that led to both a lack of telemetry and a lack of stronger airbags was Beagle 2's greatest weakness. I think that if telemetry been available which had proved that Beagle 2's airbags had burst on landing then ESA would have had the confidence to launch Beagle 3 with stronger airbags, perhaps as part of the now cancelled Net Lander mission.

I think that MPL would also have been reflown earlier than this year if telemetry had made it more clear exactly what had gone wrong in 1999.

Does anyone know whether Odyssey or MRO was able to collect meaningful telemetry from Phoenix during EDL or did they fail to collect meaningful data much as Mars Express did?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post May 29 2008, 06:41 PM
Post #4


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (PaulM @ May 29 2008, 07:14 PM) *
Does anyone know whether Odyssey or MRO was able to collect meaningful telemetry from Phoenix during EDL or did they fail to collect meaningful data much as Mars Express did?


All three of them recorded 8k and 32kbps data all the way down to the ground.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- SFJCody   Pillinger's view   May 28 2008, 09:26 AM
- - jamescanvin   QUOTE They have built at least 23 orbiting spacecr...   May 28 2008, 10:25 AM
|- - tedstryk   Yeah, huh? We have built 9 orbiters, including th...   May 28 2008, 11:10 AM
- - TheChemist   He probably refers to "landings" conside...   May 28 2008, 02:36 PM
|- - MahFL   He does whinge a bit doesn't he ?   May 28 2008, 03:50 PM
|- - Pavel   QUOTE (TheChemist @ May 28 2008, 09:36 AM...   May 29 2008, 03:42 AM
- - Greg Hullender   QUOTE nobody has ever discovered a single atom of ...   May 28 2008, 03:52 PM
|- - Juramike   QUOTE (Greg Hullender @ May 28 2008, 10:5...   May 28 2008, 05:27 PM
|- - PFK   The bit I'd take issue with from the article i...   May 28 2008, 07:27 PM
- - ngunn   Since we're onto opinions here (aside fom the ...   May 28 2008, 04:15 PM
|- - imipak   QUOTE (ngunn @ May 28 2008, 04:15 PM) Is ...   May 28 2008, 07:19 PM
- - dvandorn   I suppose my first reaction is to ask how respecte...   May 29 2008, 04:25 AM
- - Stephen   I agree with ngunn. Why all the hostility to Pilli...   May 29 2008, 08:15 AM
- - climber   This is a very interesting debate between ourselve...   May 29 2008, 09:05 AM
|- - karolp   I tend to think that if MRO were in orbit while MP...   May 29 2008, 10:10 AM
|- - tedstryk   It has nothing to do with hostility. It has to do...   May 29 2008, 02:02 PM
- - Phil Stooke   "Is it the lack of awareness or are there any...   May 29 2008, 03:24 PM
|- - Juramike   QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ May 29 2008, 10:24 A...   May 29 2008, 03:34 PM
- - djellison   I'd want to see a different engineering philos...   May 29 2008, 03:41 PM
|- - PaulM   QUOTE (djellison @ May 29 2008, 04:41 PM)...   May 29 2008, 06:14 PM
|- - djellison   QUOTE (PaulM @ May 29 2008, 07:14 PM) Doe...   May 29 2008, 06:41 PM
- - hendric   I'd donate again for Cosmos X as well. But fo...   May 29 2008, 03:45 PM
- - djellison   The instrumentation is good - to be honest I'd...   May 29 2008, 04:10 PM
- - ElkGroveDan   Let's be careful here and stick to science and...   May 29 2008, 07:19 PM
- - djellison   This threads going the wrong way. It's getti...   May 29 2008, 08:16 PM


Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 07:17 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.