IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Titan-b Flyby, Any coverage?
YesRushGen
post Dec 7 2004, 04:25 PM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 76
Joined: 26-May 04
Member No.: 77



Here we are only 5 days from the Titan-b flyby!

So far, I haven't seen any announcements of NASA-TV coverage. Also, there does not appear to be a detailed summary of spacecraft activities for Titan-b. (As there was with Titan-a)

Anyone know what gives?

Kelly
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 7 2004, 08:57 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (YesRushGen @ Dec 7 2004, 09:25 AM)
Here we are only 5 days from the Titan-b flyby!

So far, I haven't seen any announcements of NASA-TV coverage. Also, there does not appear to be a detailed summary of spacecraft activities for Titan-b. (As there was with Titan-a)

Anyone know what gives?

Kelly

There is a document just like the one from Ta for Tb and hopefully it will get released Monday or this weekend. I've been working on a release for this weekend today.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
remcook
post Dec 7 2004, 09:11 PM
Post #3


Rover Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1015
Joined: 4-March 04
Member No.: 47



will we get ISS images of the other hemisphere of Titan, so we have a full coverage?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
YesRushGen
post Dec 7 2004, 09:27 PM
Post #4


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 76
Joined: 26-May 04
Member No.: 77



Since this is another "energy removing" flyby, the flyby geometry will probably be very similar. Maybe enough difference to get a *little* farther East/West/North/South, but I bet on the whole we're flying over the same hemisphere.

Glad to hear that something of T-b will be released! But, is there still no intended live coverage of the event on NASA-TV?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 7 2004, 09:37 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (YesRushGen @ Dec 7 2004, 02:27 PM)
Since this is another "energy removing" flyby, the flyby geometry will probably be very similar. Maybe enough difference to get a *little* farther East/West/North/South, but I bet on the whole we're flying over the same hemisphere.

Glad to hear that something of T-b will be released! But, is there still no intended live coverage of the event on NASA-TV?

Tb is essentially a replay of Ta, except UVIS is driving at C/A instead of RADAR and INMS. We have complimentary coverage over the same hemisphere of Titan. the Sub-saturnian hemisphere will be imaged in T4 in late March.

The lack of NASA TV coverage is because not nearly as many team members will be in Pasadena for Tb as in Ta.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Dec 7 2004, 10:17 PM
Post #6





Guests






QUOTE (volcanopele @ Dec 7 2004, 08:57 PM)
There is a document just like the one from Ta for Tb and hopefully it will get released Monday or this weekend.  I've been working on a release for this weekend today.

Are you planning on releasing similar documents for the Icy satellite flybys? smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 7 2004, 10:31 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (Sunspot @ Dec 7 2004, 03:17 PM)
Are you planning on releasing similar documents for the Icy satellite flybys? smile.gif

I don't know. I don't see why not. The Tb document mentions the Dione non-targeted encounter but doesn't go indepth on what observations are planned (and there are observations planned).


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
YesRushGen
post Dec 7 2004, 11:42 PM
Post #8


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 76
Joined: 26-May 04
Member No.: 77



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Dec 7 2004, 09:37 PM)
...The lack of NASA TV coverage is because not nearly as many team members will be in Pasadena for Tb as in Ta.

Ah... Too bad! It was really exciting to watch NASA-TV during the coverage. I love watching everyone's reaction... (Oh yeah, and the pictures as they come down! hehe)

Will there at least be a post-flyby science briefing broadcast on NASA-TV?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 8 2004, 02:25 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (YesRushGen @ Dec 7 2004, 04:42 PM)
QUOTE (volcanopele @ Dec 7 2004, 09:37 PM)
...The lack of NASA TV coverage is because not nearly as many team members will be in Pasadena for Tb as in Ta.

Ah... Too bad! It was really exciting to watch NASA-TV during the coverage. I love watching everyone's reaction... (Oh yeah, and the pictures as they come down! hehe)

Will there at least be a post-flyby science briefing broadcast on NASA-TV?

There is a press conference planned for next Thursday at the AGU Fall conference to present the results fo the Titan and Dione flybys. Not sure if NASA TV will cover it though, sorry.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pioneer
post Dec 9 2004, 10:59 PM
Post #10


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Joined: 8-June 04
Member No.: 80



The Cassini home page said the closest approach will be 1,200 km. I thought it was 2000-something km.

I get the feeling not as much science will be done this time as the during the Titan-A flyby.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 9 2004, 11:40 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (pioneer @ Dec 9 2004, 03:59 PM)
The Cassini home page said the closest approach will be 1,200 km. I thought it was 2000-something km.

I get the feeling not as much science will be done this time as the during the Titan-A flyby.

There is just as much science, just different type. Our images should be of higher quality since they have a better signal to noise. UVIS is taking a coouple of star occulation measurements.

The change in altitude is related to the increase in the Iapetus encounter distance to account for the prior uncertainty in Iapetus' mass.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mongo
post Dec 11 2004, 06:22 PM
Post #12


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 723
Joined: 13-June 04
Member No.: 82



The Cassini home website has the Titan-b mission description up:

http://saturn1.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/pro...yby20041206.pdf

Bill
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Dec 11 2004, 06:47 PM
Post #13





Guests






LOTS of Titan RAW images just posted......

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/raw/index.cfm

This image shows a white streak, which gradually appears to fade.

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...eiImageID=27946

Possibly a cloud?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Dec 11 2004, 08:34 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



I hope they label the spot they used the SAR on last time. They aren't using it this time.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 11 2004, 11:41 PM
Post #15


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (alan @ Dec 11 2004, 01:34 PM)
I hope they label the spot they used the SAR on last time. They aren't using it this time.

The sar from last time is to far to the north to be see on this encounter, even in the global views.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OWW
post Dec 12 2004, 07:52 PM
Post #16


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 724
Joined: 28-September 04
Member No.: 99



This is weird. Nearly all the Titan images in the latest batch lost the lower portion... Something wrong with the camera/filter wheel?

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...eiImageID=28201
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Dec 12 2004, 08:58 PM
Post #17





Guests






Maybe data drop out? Although its mostly the CB3 filtered images.. Odd
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 12 2004, 09:41 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Not sure either. All the images that are NOT truncated used LUT compression, the ones are truncated did not. I think we are in the process of figuring out what happened. Luckily, the south pole is continuing its nice, sunny day so it looks like we didn't miss much.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OWW
post Dec 12 2004, 09:45 PM
Post #19


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 724
Joined: 28-September 04
Member No.: 99



If it's not a ground issue I assume it's too late to correct it on board Cassini in time for the closest approach? sad.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 12 2004, 10:19 PM
Post #20


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



most likely yes. The bits per pixel estimation for this observation was likely underestimated, so when the images went over their alottment, the SSR stoped saving the image image, causing the truncation. The LUT compressed images don't have this problem.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 12 2004, 10:41 PM
Post #21


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



The bits/pixel estimate for the highest resolution images should be a bit better since we used the same ones last encounter (IIRC) so those should be better. However, we won't be able to recover the rest of the images we have on the ground now.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Dec 14 2004, 05:27 AM
Post #22


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



New images of Titan posted
http://ciclops.lpl.arizona.edu/view_event.php?id=7
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Dec 14 2004, 11:13 AM
Post #23





Guests






Haze Layers:

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...eiImageID=28310
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Dec 15 2004, 12:31 AM
Post #24


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



From near closest approach
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...eiImageID=28684
Not much to see, going to take a lot if image processing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Dec 15 2004, 12:33 AM
Post #25


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



This one looks much better, and familiar, maybe someone with sharp eyes will spot something that changed between them.
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...eiImageID=28631
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Dec 15 2004, 01:10 PM
Post #26


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1





Fudged together from something almost red-green-blueish smile.gif

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Dec 15 2004, 01:21 PM
Post #27


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1





Fudged from green, blue and UV
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Dec 15 2004, 06:24 PM
Post #28


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



The the flyby discription lists an atmospreic occultion near closest approch. Those haze layers should give some interesting results.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Dec 15 2004, 06:41 PM
Post #29


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



I see many raw images from closest approach and from 250,000 kilometers and farther. I like the medium resoltion shots better, they seem to show more than the high resoltion, must be the angle with the sun. Of course since their the ones I want they are the last ones posted
sad.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mike
post Dec 16 2004, 04:54 AM
Post #30


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 350
Joined: 20-June 04
From: Portland, Oregon, U.S.A.
Member No.: 86



Aye, it's hard to get a handle on what I'm looking at exactly on the closest pictures of Titan.. but I suppose that's Titan for ya.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Dec 17 2004, 03:19 AM
Post #31


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



A close-up of mid latitude clouds
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA06157
they are also being observed from earth
http://www.universetoday.com/am/publish/ne...n.html?16122004
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
remcook
post Dec 17 2004, 09:51 AM
Post #32


Rover Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1015
Joined: 4-March 04
Member No.: 47



http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/news/press-rele...041216-pr-a.cfm
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gs2.cgi....jpg&type=image

something for the eye smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OWW
post Dec 17 2004, 02:34 PM
Post #33


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 724
Joined: 28-September 04
Member No.: 99



Look at this image: http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA06159. The caption states:
"Among the new features seen in this mosaic is a strangely shaped bright feature near the center of the image".

I am not exactly sure which bright feature they mean, but I think it's the one I attached below. This is pretty exciting. It looks like there are teardrop shaped 'crater islands' in the bright areas too. What does that mean? unsure.gif
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 17 2004, 03:51 PM
Post #34


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



I was refering to the splotch from Tuesday's image but is in the gap on my Ta mosaic. For best results, read the Ta mosaic caption, then the Tb mosaic caption. It will make far more since then.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Dec 17 2004, 04:17 PM
Post #35


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Can I just say - DAMN - this is one mystifying hell hole biggrin.gif

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Dec 17 2004, 10:06 PM
Post #36


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



I'm curious, did they make this mosaic
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gs2.cgi....jpg&type=image
out of raw images that look like this
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...eiImageID=28659
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 17 2004, 10:16 PM
Post #37


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (alan @ Dec 17 2004, 03:06 PM)

The images I used aren't on the raw images page for some reason.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Dec 18 2004, 04:43 PM
Post #38


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



Thats odd, I checked the raw images, used the search to find most recent images of Titan, now the most recent ones that come up are from October.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Dec 18 2004, 06:05 PM
Post #39


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2257
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



Yes, very strange. The most recent images there of any target are from October 26.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Dec 18 2004, 07:14 PM
Post #40


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1279
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



I can hear the X-files Theme Song as I type this. tongue.gif

It happened last night around 10pm est. sad.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Dec 18 2004, 07:34 PM
Post #41


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



I was waiting for the medium resolution images from the recent flyby to come in so I could look for changes, wishful thinking I know, maybe they don't want anyone beating them to it laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 18 2004, 07:50 PM
Post #42


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



all the medium resolution images taken in Ta and Tb have been released in those mosaics. I swear. Okay, there are two and half missing from the Tb mosaic, one because I put in the wrong geometry, the other one a half because they only had one image for those frames, and didn't want to mess with those.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Dec 18 2004, 10:55 PM
Post #43


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



I wasn't thinking that they weren't being released, I was expecting to see the individual frames 500x500 rather than shunk down and pasted together in a mosaic. Of course there may not have been much detail visible is the raw images, I remember all the nearly black ones from the first pass.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 20 2004, 06:47 PM
Post #44


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



unfortunately, due to the low signal in the close up Titan images ,the normal stretching scheme used by the raw iamges page breaks down, as you saw from Ta. I in no way control what images are put up and when, but I doubt you would get much out of them, but I never know.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Dec 20 2004, 08:46 PM
Post #45


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



I've seen plans four a four year mission for Cassini. What happens after this? Crash it into Saturn like they did with Galileo or an extended mission? I'd like to see it in orbit around Titan but that doesn't seem likely since it ends in a near polar orbit around Saturn.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 20 2004, 09:59 PM
Post #46


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (alan @ Dec 20 2004, 01:46 PM)
I've seen plans four a four year mission for Cassini. What happens after this? Crash it into Saturn like they did with Galileo or an extended mission? I'd like to see it in orbit around Titan but that doesn't seem likely since it ends in a near polar orbit around Saturn.

My reply is at http://mer.rlproject.com/index.php?showtop...st=0&#entry3089


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 10:44 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.