IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Spacecraft through the Asteroid belt
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post Jun 6 2008, 11:52 AM
Post #1





Guests






Let's start a complete listing with the obvious:

Pioneer 10
Pioneer 11
Voyager 1
Voyager 2
Galileo
Cassini-Huygens
New Horizons

NEAR Shoemaker
Deep Space 1
Hayabusa
Dawn
Rosetta (already ?)

not sure about Stardust ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 7)
climber
post Jun 6 2008, 12:12 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2924
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



"Heureux qui comme Ulysses a fait un beau voyage..."
That's the start of one of the most well know french poem.
Could be traduce (if one can traduce poetry) "Happy like Ulysses who had a nice journey..."
I mean, the real Ulysses didn't cross the Asteroid belt


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mps
post Jun 6 2008, 12:51 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 118
Joined: 18-November 07
Member No.: 3964



PhilCo, are you sure about NEAR and Hayabusa? I mean, Eros and Itokawa aren't main belt asteroids, but near earth asteroids. Of course, it depends how do you define 'asteroid belt' in this thread.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Jun 6 2008, 01:52 PM
Post #4


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4407
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Yes, Stardust should be on the list. In fact, 5535 Annefrank is a mainbelt asteroid. Also, Mars-7 sent back significant particle and fields data from the asteroid belt, as well as data of Jovian decametric radiation. MPS - you are right about Eros, but Mathilde, the asteroid NEAR flew by, was a main belt asteroid.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post Jun 6 2008, 03:21 PM
Post #5





Guests






Indeed, asteroid 253 Mathilde is listed as a main belt asteroid, so NEAR was waltzing Mathilde in the right region for this topic laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mps
post Jun 6 2008, 08:47 PM
Post #6


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 118
Joined: 18-November 07
Member No.: 3964



alright, I didn't know about the close relationship between NEAR and Mathilde smile.gif (It wasn't so easy to follow NASA missions events back in '97, especially in my country wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
David
post Jun 7 2008, 02:49 AM
Post #7


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 809
Joined: 11-March 04
Member No.: 56



Perhaps a distinction can be made between missions to and missions through the asteroid belt. I suppose the latter is more-or-less equivalent to "missions that have crossed Jupiter's orbit".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post Jun 7 2008, 06:05 PM
Post #8





Guests






253 Mathilde was discovered in 1885 by Johann Palisa. The name is thought to honor the wife of astronomer Moritz Loewy, then the vice director of the Paris Observatory.
253 Mathilde is the largest asteroid to be visited by spacecraft (NEAR in June 1997). It is 52 kilometers in diameter and is approximately four times the size of 951 Gaspra and two times the size of 243 Ida. Ida and Gaspra were visited by the Galileo spacecraft on October 29, 1991 and August 28, 1993 respectively.
Bit strange I don’t find it in the Asteroid listing of “The “Planetary Scientist’s Companion” pages 251-263. It gets a separate page 249
huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 08:00 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.