IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

17 Pages V  « < 12 13 14 15 16 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
To the Cape! (part 2), For real this time!
Guest_Oersted_*
post Jul 16 2008, 06:34 PM
Post #196





Guests






On your excellent route map, Tesheiner, it seems quite clear which area they should steer clear of, namely the down-flow of loose sand which even has some ripples in it. It seems there's a bridge across that down-flow a good deal further down, just off the large boulder that has come off the cliff. There, you can quite clearly see "stepping stones" across the down-flow, which might suggest that going close to the cliff and then along the face would lead to a position further down where they can move away from the face again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PDP8E
post Jul 16 2008, 08:54 PM
Post #197


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 808
Joined: 10-October 06
From: Maynard Mass USA
Member No.: 1241



Mike,

WOW - You rock!
Cheating never looked so good!

(you guys with the hyper image skills, just kill me)

Cheers


--------------------
CLA CLL
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Jul 16 2008, 09:07 PM
Post #198


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



QUOTE (mhoward @ Jul 14 2008, 10:12 PM) *



WOW! That is soooo cool!


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Jul 18 2008, 08:46 AM
Post #199





Guests






This looks odd:
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...BHP1392R0M1.JPG
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 18 2008, 08:54 AM
Post #200


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Steering to the right, fully, with a big of dig-in.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Jul 18 2008, 05:03 PM
Post #201


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



I'm really loving the shadow in this rear hazcam:

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...BKP1314R0M2.JPG

Nice outline of the arrays, PMA, Low gain, High gain, and is that the sundial mast in there as well.


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 18 2008, 05:15 PM
Post #202


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Probably the UHF antenna, and a pyro-bolt. I think the gnenom, errm, gnomen, err, sundial stalk bit would be behind the HGA shadow.

VERY cool picture smile.gif

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Jul 18 2008, 05:35 PM
Post #203


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



I reckon it is the sundial, compare to this navcam taken at an earlier time of sol. The shadows are shorter (the low gain and PMA shadows fall on the deck) and the sundial shadow falls right to the edge of the deck even at this time. The position, particularly relative to the pyro-bolt and the array outline matches too.


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 18 2008, 07:40 PM
Post #204


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Nope - I think you're right.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jul 19 2008, 02:34 PM
Post #205


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Nice new view of some of the most eroded rocks at the base of CV...





--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 21 2008, 06:29 AM
Post #206


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Today, sol 1596, Opportunity continued its efforts to drive up to the wall of Cape Verde.
But this time, differently from previous days when the rear wheels were digging in the sand, specially the right one (left on the images), we can see they are back on "solid" ground. Reason is (I guess) because the rover moved back down slope and not uphill.

I hope this is just a sort of "tactical manouver". smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jul 21 2008, 07:07 AM
Post #207


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



They finaly read my previous post wink.gif : http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...st&p=118402


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aussie
post Jul 21 2008, 07:08 AM
Post #208


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 144
Joined: 17-July 07
From: Canberra Australia
Member No.: 2865



From the front hazcam looks more like a turn in place to the left.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post Jul 22 2008, 12:42 PM
Post #209


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1619
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Bergerac - FR
Member No.: 678



Color anaglyph of the nice rocks on the ground smile.gif



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aussie
post Jul 23 2008, 08:21 AM
Post #210


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 144
Joined: 17-July 07
From: Canberra Australia
Member No.: 2865



Another turn in place to the left today. Seems that they may be orientating for a drive up slope and possibly out of the crater?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

17 Pages V  « < 12 13 14 15 16 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 08:53 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.