IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Water Ice Confirmed!, White stuff sublimates away
ElkGroveDan
post Jun 19 2008, 06:21 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (ugordan @ Jun 19 2008, 09:17 AM) *
Dan, I think you've mistaken a part of sunlit soil in Phil's image as white stuff.


Agreed.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
ugordan
post Jun 19 2008, 07:10 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3652
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Here's a flicker between sol 21 and 24 showing change (or, rather, lack of):


Ignore the color of the brightest part of the white stuff, it's overexposed. The small white chunk in sol 21 image appears to disappear in sol 24 (inset).


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Jun 20 2008, 05:40 AM
Post #3


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Too low pressure and high temperature for CO2 ice. We know the temperature at the landing site -- on sol 22, for instance, it was a high of -22 and a low of -80. And the pressure is very low, on the order of 8 millibars. If you look at a phase diagram for carbon dioxide, you'll see it's always a gas under all these conditions -- it has to get really, really cold to make carbon dioxide ice, and you don't get that cold at the low elevations near Mars' north pole during the summer.
Attached Image

I took this phase diagram from an interesting article, "Why You Can't Have a Snowball Fight on Mars"

This may make you wonder, okay, if you read that diagram it looks like water should be stable as a solid under these conditions, so why did the chunks vaporize? The problem is that the diagrams assume equilibrium conditions. But Mars is a big system and there's heating during the day and cooling at night and dry or wet air masses moving in and wind doing stuff, so at any moment things aren't in equilibrium. I understand that there could be some conditions prevailing at the Phoenix landing site that might even lead to net deposition of water ice, but they've always seemed fairly sure that excavated chunks would sublimate during the day. (I wonder if any water ice deposition happens in cold traps overnight.) Large bodies of ice like what's exposed under the lander might show little change, sublimating a tiny bit during the day and getting deposited on a bit overnight. But if you sublimate much of a chunk during the day, it's gone for good; it's not like a chunk is going to reappear from nothing overnight, so chunks that are sufficiently small should go away as a result of cyclic sublimation and deposition.

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 05:59 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.