Power Levels |
Power Levels |
Sep 5 2008, 07:12 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 18-December 07 From: New York Member No.: 3982 |
This has been discussed within other threads before but considering how important it is becoming, I think it deserves its own thread.
Since we are now on sol 100 with fall fast approaching, I was wondering if anyone has been keeping track of the power levels for Phoenix. Any idea when they might have to add recharging sols into the sol-to-sol planning? How low might the power levels be on Sept 30 and will that affect further mission extensions? |
|
|
Sep 5 2008, 08:39 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 29-January 06 Member No.: 667 |
I don't know where the power readings are reported.
Apropos the general situation: Space.com: 90 Days on Mars: Phoenix Lander Sends Martian Postcard (August 28) QUOTE The amount of power generated by Phoenix's two solar arrays is also on the decline, with the probe currently generating about 2,500 watt-hours each day - or about 1,000 watt-hours less than when it landed - because of waning sunlight. The absolute minimum needed for Phoenix to perform the most basic operations is about 1,000 watt-hours, mission managers said. "We're predicting that's the end of mission," Goldstein said, adding that current projections put that power benchmark in November. |
|
|
Sep 7 2008, 05:47 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
I suspect this has already been explained on this forum, but I can't recall it. Is there any possibility that this amazing device might be revived when the sun returns to these northern regions of Mars' next year, or is "lights out" the end of the road for Phoenix?
-------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
Sep 7 2008, 07:25 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 18-December 07 From: New York Member No.: 3982 |
I suspect this has already been explained on this forum, but I can't recall it. Is there any possibility that this amazing device might be revived when the sun returns to these northern regions of Mars' next year, or is "lights out" the end of the road for Phoenix? Isn't this entire region covered by solid CO2 ("dry ice") in the winter. I think that would spell the end for any electronic device. |
|
|
Guest_Zvezdichko_* |
Sep 7 2008, 07:56 AM
Post
#5
|
Guests |
QUOTE The absolute minimum needed for Phoenix to perform the most basic operations is about 1,000 watt-hours, mission managers said. Isn't that very much compared to MERs? |
|
|
Sep 7 2008, 10:07 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14433 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Isn't that very much compared to MERs? It's also older electroncis compared to MER, and far more challenging conditions ( requiring more heating etc ) And, for what I think is probably the 10th time on this forum. Yes - there is a 'lazurus' code onboard incase it wakes up in the spring, but no one realistically expects it to survive. Doug |
|
|
Guest_Zvezdichko_* |
Sep 7 2008, 10:22 AM
Post
#7
|
Guests |
Sorry. I forgot that many of its parts are actually old (Mars 2001 Surveyor lander, etc)...
I also don't expect it to survive. Even the NEAR spacecraft didn't. |
|
|
Sep 7 2008, 10:34 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14433 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
I'd also add that the compact, well insulated WEB of the rovers probably performs a far better job of insulating itself than the Phoenix design.
Doug |
|
|
Guest_Zvezdichko_* |
Sep 7 2008, 10:52 AM
Post
#9
|
Guests |
It's probably right, but for a mission of this type - when the most basic instruments have single-use ovens and beakers, all task will be accomplished until the sun fully sets.
I'll be very interested to see the MET and LIDAR functioning up to this time, though . |
|
|
Sep 7 2008, 01:20 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Martian Photographer Group: Members Posts: 352 Joined: 3-March 05 Member No.: 183 |
I'd also add that the compact, well insulated WEB of the rovers probably performs a far better job of insulating itself than the Phoenix design. Not my specialty, but I imagine so. The PHX EBs were originally spec'd for an equatorial mission, and they have no RHUs. They're beefed up enough that energy dissipation into the EBs occasionally affected operations due to the need to avoid being too hot (as with the MERs). But of course the PHX payload could dump more energy into the boxes than the MERs could. Spirit demonstrates another difference--the rovers can sleep 23.9 h /sol if needed. PHX requires periodic, brief housekeeping wakeups like Mars Polar Lander would have needed. The way PHX works is suited to one of the goals, getting diurnal coverage of the atmospheric state. So on the face it is shocking to see that PHX survival energy is comparable to the best days of Spirit's life ... but that is just the difference between the missions. The PHX panels were designed for PHX (OK, M'01, but for the way the lander uses energy) -- lots of area, no worries about mobility. But the MER's of course would need much more energy per day with no RHU and a peak temperature of -30 or so, even ignoring the other considerations. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 5th June 2024 - 06:49 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |