My Assistant
Mission Success Criteria |
Jul 22 2008, 07:27 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
It's currently halfway through Sol 56. We have, to this point, accomplished the following (please correct me if I'm missing anything):
- Full Mission Success stereo color pan of the entire landing site - Full RAC coverage of what it can view under the lander - One TEGA run - One WCL run - Two OM images of soil - Zero AFM images of soil - Programmed observations of winds and temperatures How far, with only 34.5 sols left in the 90-sol primary mission, does that leave us from accomplishing the Mission Success Criteria? (Capitalized so that, as Steve Squyres noted, if you fail to accomplish them you'll know that You Have Failed.) I understand that things are working well enough that we can likely count on a good 30 sols of full mission activity past the base 90-sol mission. Even at figuring that in, we appear to be nearly halfway through Phoenix's entire useful lifetime. Are we seriously in jeopardy of failing to achieve some of the success criteria? -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Jul 23 2008, 07:35 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2924 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
Trouble is that up to date we had 2 kinds of spacecrafts at Mars :
+ the one that are wayyyyy above mission success. I mean much much above. + the one that totaly failed There's nothing inbetween so we all have HIGH expectations for Phoenix. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Jul 24 2008, 09:22 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 128 Joined: 5-May 04 Member No.: 74 |
Trouble is that up to date we had 2 kinds of spacecrafts at Mars : + the one that are wayyyyy above mission success. I mean much much above. + the one that totaly failed There's nothing inbetween so we all have HIGH expectations for Phoenix. That's kind of the rule for stuff in general: either it's well-made so lasts well past the warranty period, or it's junk and breaks right away. |
|
|
|
dvandorn Mission Success Criteria Jul 22 2008, 07:27 AM
jamescanvin For reference
QUOTE Minimum Mission Success
1. L... Jul 22 2008, 08:38 AM
Deimos By my count:
Minimum--done.
Full:
1-3: 100%
4: 100... Jul 22 2008, 11:17 AM
djellison It's worth noting, Opportunity only achieved F... Jul 22 2008, 12:01 PM
jmknapp A good indication is the number of press conferenc... Jul 23 2008, 12:03 AM
tasp (If I may, a few funny ones)
* Not landing on an ... Jul 23 2008, 01:34 AM
nprev ...reminded of an ancient Mike Peters cartoon that... Jul 23 2008, 01:48 AM
tasp LOL, that was what sparked my little outburst ther... Jul 23 2008, 03:41 AM
glennwsmith Perhaps Peter Smith has a different conception of ... Jul 23 2008, 05:41 AM
JRehling Some of the requirements are vague in a way that l... Jul 24 2008, 02:38 AM
tedstryk QUOTE (ToSeek @ Jul 24 2008, 09:22 PM) Th... Jul 30 2008, 10:55 PM
nprev They may have more schedule margin then we know, t... Jul 24 2008, 02:44 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 05:41 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|