New Frontiers 4: Argo? |
New Frontiers 4: Argo? |
Aug 21 2008, 01:36 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 513 Joined: 13-June 04 Member No.: 82 |
There does not appear to be a thread about this proposed New Frontiers mission, so I am starting this one. If there is an existing thread that I am unaware of, then by all means merge them.
Argo is a proposed outer solar system multiple flyby mission, rather like an updated Voyager mission, but based on the New Horizons bus, and using a similar instrument suite. It would launch between 2017 and 2019, with either a Jupiter / Neptune / KBO or a Trojan / Saturn / Neptune / KBO trajectory. Even a combined Jupiter / Saturn / Neptune / KBO trajectory is possible. Neptune would present a much different system than in 1989, as telescopic observations show a more dynamic Neptune atmosphere, due to the change in season, and much more of Triton and the other Neptune satellites would be visible (most of Triton's northern hemisphere was in darkness in 1989, but will be well lit in 2030). The second big payoff would be the vastly greater access to KBOs (~4000 times the accessable volume of New Horizons), with several already-known large KBOs (400km diameter or larger) within reach. The objects reachable with Argo are expected to include: 18 cold classical KBOs (interesting because they apparently formed in situ beyond Neptune's orbit, rather than further inward) 40 KBOs with diameters between 200km and 400km 9 KBOs with diameters greater than 400km several binary KBOs plus the possible Jupiter Trojan early in the mission. The wide expected range of choices allows for the selected KBO to be of very high scientific interest (and naturally, follow-on KBO targets could be selected after the primary KBO target has been selected). Typical flight times from launch to the Neptune flyby are about 10 years (Jupiter gravity assist) or 13 years (Jupiter Trojan flyby), with the large KBO flyby 2 or 3 years later. Expected cost including launch vehicle (according to the linked pdf): under $800M with the following strawman instrument package: High resolution visible camera: New Horizons (NH) or reduced Cassini heritage Near-IR spectrometer: NH heritage UV solar & stellar occ. spectrometer: reduced Cassini heritage Far-IR linear radiometer: Diviner heritage Magnetometer: replaces NH dust instrument Charged particle spectrometer: NH heritage Gimballed high-gain antenna: heritage radio science instrument The big uncertainty at this point seems to be the availability of plutonium-powered RTGs by the time of launch. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Aug 21 2008, 04:32 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 53 Joined: 8-November 06 From: Indiana, USA Member No.: 1337 |
Actually, the Pioneer Venus sent their data directly to Earth. The orbiter had not yet arrived. Of course, I am not advocating the same is possible from Neptune.
|
|
|
|
Aug 21 2008, 07:07 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1008 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
Actually, the Pioneer Venus sent their data directly to Earth. The orbiter had not yet arrived. Of course, I am not advocating the same is possible from Neptune. Wow! Forgive me, but I found that so hard to believe, I looked it up, and you are correct: http://www.honeysucklecreek.net/dss44/pioneer_venus.html Even though Venus was just past inferior conjunction, it was still at least 41 million km away, so that's pretty impressive. QUOTE The Small Probes fell through the atmosphere in times varying from 53 to 55 minutes, transmitting telemetry data with only 10 watt transmitters. Though weak, the signals were capable of being received by the 64 metre antennas of the DSN at a rate of 64 bits per second. Once they reached a height of 30 kilometres the data rate dropped to 16 bits per second. If Argos' antenna were 6.4m, then, one might expect it to be able to collect data from the probe from 4.1 million km away, which ought to be enough in advance of the flyby to present no problems. QUOTE All four probes were designed for a descent time of approximately 55 minutes before impacting the surface. None were designed to withstand the impact. However the Small Day Probe did survive and sent data from the surface for an extra 67 minutes. Engineering data radioed back from the Day Probe showed that its internal temperature climbed steadily to a high of 126°C. Then the batteries went flat and its signal disappeared. One then wonders just how long such a probe might survive on Neptune. Could it even float above its crush depth and still be able to transmit anything? --Greg |
|
|
|
Aug 21 2008, 08:03 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 404 Joined: 22-April 05 Member No.: 351 |
One then wonders just how long such a probe might survive on Neptune. Could it even float above its crush depth and still be able to transmit anything? A balloon, if I remember correctly, would work in the atmosphere, and a parachute could allow the probe to transmit for a considerable time, especially since (from memory) the water vapor level is down around 400 bars. In fact, one of the problems with a Neptune probe is that it takes so long to reach the warmer atmosphere that there are (1) severe pressure issues (2) transmission issues (lots of methane to absorb radio waves and (3) relay problems because the relay craft has to stay in line of sight for hours. One person once told me that a Juno-like microwave radiometer would not work at Uranus and Neptune because of the depth of the atmosphere before you sample all the regions (e.g., water vapor) desired. However, it was an off the cuff remark and I don't know the source. It seems credible. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Mongo New Frontiers 4: Argo? Aug 21 2008, 01:36 AM
vjkane This is my favorite mission option for the 2nd New... Aug 21 2008, 04:56 AM
tedstryk QUOTE (vjkane @ Aug 21 2008, 04:56 AM) Th... Aug 21 2008, 11:43 AM
Greg Hullender In one of the backup slides, they noted that they ... Aug 21 2008, 03:43 PM
Mongo New Horizons masses 478 kg. I assume that Argo wo... Aug 21 2008, 04:08 PM
ugordan QUOTE (Mongo @ Aug 21 2008, 06:08 PM) Is ... Aug 21 2008, 04:20 PM
Greg Hullender The Galileo atmospheric probe weighed 339 kg, of w... Aug 21 2008, 04:29 PM
vjkane QUOTE (Greg Hullender @ Aug 21 2008, 05:2... Aug 21 2008, 04:48 PM
mchan A steerable antenna would add complexity and cost.... Aug 21 2008, 06:32 PM
Mongo It is interesting that from what I read here at Un... Aug 22 2008, 01:34 AM
vjkane QUOTE (Mongo @ Aug 22 2008, 02:34 AM) Tha... Aug 22 2008, 03:40 AM
Mongo According to this report entitled Radioisotope Pow... Aug 22 2008, 05:05 AM
vjkane QUOTE (Mongo @ Aug 22 2008, 06:05 AM) ... Aug 22 2008, 02:42 PM
Greg Hullender QUOTE (vjkane @ Aug 22 2008, 07:42 AM) Ju... Aug 22 2008, 03:55 PM
infocat13 QUOTE (Greg Hullender @ Aug 22 2008, 11:5... Nov 2 2008, 08:54 PM
Vultur I kind of hope New Frontiers #3 is a Venus lander ... Nov 3 2008, 12:11 AM
Enceladus75 Yes, I would love to see another landing on Venus ... Nov 6 2008, 01:08 AM
jgoldader QUOTE (Enceladus75 @ Nov 5 2008, 08:08 PM... Nov 6 2008, 01:52 AM
mchan QUOTE (infocat13 @ Nov 2 2008, 12:54 PM) ... Nov 6 2008, 05:00 AM
Mark6 QUOTE (mchan @ Nov 6 2008, 05:00 AM) For ... Nov 12 2008, 10:10 PM
elakdawalla What makes me think that is that clearly Hansen an... Nov 12 2008, 11:14 PM
vjkane Both outer planet flagship proposals include the o... Nov 13 2008, 12:17 AM

Mark6 QUOTE (vjkane @ Nov 13 2008, 01:17 AM) Fr... Nov 13 2008, 03:46 AM

vjkane QUOTE (Mark6 @ Nov 13 2008, 03:46 AM) I h... Nov 13 2008, 06:34 AM
mchan QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Nov 12 2008, 03:14 P... Nov 13 2008, 07:13 AM
infocat13 Mango and Emily and our other posters................ Nov 13 2008, 08:10 AM
Mark6 Yet it is still the case of squeezing as much as p... Nov 13 2008, 04:58 PM
mchan QUOTE (Mark6 @ Nov 13 2008, 08:58 AM) ...... Nov 14 2008, 11:33 AM
dvandorn I know where you can find a few pounds of Pu-238. ... Nov 14 2008, 07:29 AM
infocat13 QUOTE (dvandorn @ Nov 14 2008, 02:29 AM) ... Nov 14 2008, 08:24 AM
dvandorn Oh, this isn't a bomb, it's not weapons-gr... Nov 14 2008, 08:55 AM
stevesliva Thought you meant Mars 96 for a bit.
And yeah, I ... Nov 14 2008, 06:38 PM
infocat13 QUOTE (stevesliva @ Nov 14 2008, 02:38 PM... Nov 15 2008, 04:53 AM
Ken90000 Apollo 13's ALSEP? Nov 14 2008, 07:17 PM
imipak ISTR reading about RTG powered cable taps*, but ... Nov 14 2008, 10:17 PM
dvandorn Give Ken the Kewpie doll, we have a winner!
... Nov 14 2008, 10:41 PM
dvandorn Actually, while I was mostly kidding about any att... Nov 15 2008, 06:09 AM
mchan With a radioactive half-life of 87.7 years, you... Nov 15 2008, 07:47 AM
sci44 I wonder how far you can go by just reducing the s... Nov 20 2008, 09:14 PM
vjkane QUOTE (sci44 @ Nov 20 2008, 09:14 PM) I w... Nov 21 2008, 12:52 AM
sci44 QUOTE (vjkane @ Nov 21 2008, 12:52 AM) Ur... Dec 1 2008, 10:33 PM
infocat13 http://www.lpi.usra.edu/opag/nov2008Meetin...ation... Dec 9 2008, 01:26 AM
mchan The slides in the March OPAG presentation showed M... Nov 21 2008, 07:24 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 11:23 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|