IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Shuttle Extension 2015, the buzz
djellison
post Sep 3 2008, 08:39 PM
Post #16


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13801
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (ilbasso @ Sep 3 2008, 09:32 PM) *
Maybe the solution is that if there are subjects which the moderators feel smack of politics, they should be _ _ _ _ _ _ _


Fill in the blank. 7 letters, first is D.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Sep 3 2008, 09:06 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4660
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Sloughhouse, CA
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (ilbasso @ Sep 3 2008, 01:32 PM) *
Maybe the solution is

We all know where the edge is. It's probably best not to play next to it.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Sep 3 2008, 09:26 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1010
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



QUOTE (Paolo Amoroso @ Sep 2 2008, 11:10 AM) *
Wayne Hale's thoughts on closing the Shuttle program provide some solid organizational and technical background.


I had not seen this before, and I found it enlightening and depressing at the same time. If things are as he says (and he's very convincing) then while they might add ONE shuttle flight to the list, maybe two, that's really it -- even if Congress wanted to throw money at it. By the time they could scare up new vendors for the parts and get those qualified it would almost be time for the new boosters anyway. Never mind dvandorn's equally serious arguments.

These arguments seem so strong, I wonder why the idea even comes up now? This seems simple enough for NASA to explain to the press. Maybe they need a "rude Q&A" page on "Why we can't extend the shuttle program." :-)

--Greg



QUOTE (djellison @ Sep 3 2008, 01:39 PM) *
Fill in the blank. 7 letters, first is D.



Debated?

--Greg (ducks) :-)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Sep 4 2008, 08:03 AM
Post #19


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 7086
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Speaking absolutely apolitically, there seem to be a number of vehicles under development from many sources that could support ISS logistics to varying degrees. Jules Verne is still docked, for example, and IIRC Japan is developing something similar. I've also heard that private companies like SpaceX are interested in entering the market if & when Falcon 9 becomes a reliable reality.

Supply chains, like anything else, are horribly vulnerable to single-point (in this case, single-channel) failures unless enough redundancy is built in to the system. It would be interesting to know if these emerging alternatives are being considered as part of the Shuttle retirement decision.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ilbasso
post Sep 4 2008, 12:02 PM
Post #20


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 752
Joined: 23-October 04
From: Greensboro, NC USA
Member No.: 103



Last word on the subject, I promise, but I found the perfect illustration of the Apollo X crew "assuming the position" for political discourse.



--------------------
Jonathan Ward
Manning the LCC at http://www.apollolaunchcontrol.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd October 2014 - 04:47 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.