My Assistant
MSL schedule delay? |
Sep 9 2008, 08:10 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 721 Joined: 22-April 05 Member No.: 351 |
The most recent Aviation Week and Space Technology (9/8) has the following tidbit in a piece on NASA schedule delays:
"On the robotoic front, the testing schedule for a critical instrument for the Mars Science Laboratory -- dubbed SAM for Sample Analysis at Mars -- may delay launch of the advanced rover from its 2009 planetary window into 2011." -------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() |
Oct 7 2008, 02:56 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 172 Joined: 17-March 06 Member No.: 709 |
I imagine that someone at NASA has thought of this, but perhaps the best way to handle MSL's "situation" would be to delay its launch until 2010. This extra year would allow the Assembly and Test of MSL to proceed at a safe pace. You are right if you noticed that there is no Mars launch window in 2010. To get around this, MSL would be launched into a Solar Holding Orbit that would return it to Earth 1 year after launch. This Earth flyby would occur in the 2011 Mars window and the flyby would inject MSL into a trans-Mars trajectory. This procedure was used by the Rosetta and Messenger spacecraft when they experienced launch delays. To avoid flying too close to the Sun in this holding orbit, the spacecraft's solar orbit incorporates an appropriate inclination to the Ecliptic. When the spacecraft returns to Earth after 1 year, the flyby takes out that inclination and transfers that orbital energy into a change in perihelion or aphelion. The advantage of launching early and waiting a year in solar orbit comes down to cost. Rosetta's launch delay, of about 1 year, added about $100 million dollars to that project's cost. Another year's delay would have added another $100 million to the cost. Therefore, let's remove the danger of speeding through Assembly and Test for MSL and target its launch for 2010. It should save a good amount of money over the alternative of waiting until 2011, assuming that MSL is ready to launch in 2010. Another Phil |
|
|
|
Oct 7 2008, 03:42 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2559 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
I imagine that someone at NASA has thought of this, but perhaps the best way to handle MSL's "situation" would be to delay its launch until 2010. From the article referenced upthread: "If the science lander is delayed, it could be launched in 2010 and parked in a solar orbit until 2011, when Mars is again in range of Earth, Green said." -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
|
vjkane MSL schedule delay? Sep 9 2008, 08:10 PM
MahFL Oh crap, please say it's not true. Sep 10 2008, 04:45 PM
monitorlizard I read that same tidbit. It'll be interesting... Sep 10 2008, 06:19 PM
vjkane QUOTE (monitorlizard @ Sep 10 2008, 07:19... Sep 10 2008, 06:34 PM
vjkane Science magazine just published an article on the ... Sep 25 2008, 11:47 PM
Burmese Given the ongoing series of reported delays and se... Sep 26 2008, 05:14 PM
mcaplinger QUOTE (Burmese @ Sep 26 2008, 09:14 AM) S... Sep 26 2008, 06:15 PM

centsworth_II QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Sep 26 2008, 01:15 PM... Sep 26 2008, 06:40 PM
djellison QUOTE (Burmese @ Sep 26 2008, 06:14 PM) l... Sep 26 2008, 07:30 PM
siravan If MSL launch is in fact delayed until 2011, there... Sep 27 2008, 06:54 PM
Fran Ontanaya If a delay to 2011 allows to address the issues wi... Sep 27 2008, 07:07 PM
mars loon According to this new report in Aviation Week on O... Oct 3 2008, 04:11 PM
Vultur Ouch. I really, really hope they can finish buildi... Oct 4 2008, 12:37 AM
gallen_53 I have heard that $1.7 billion has already be... Oct 4 2008, 04:59 AM
djellison QUOTE (gallen_53 @ Oct 4 2008, 05:59 AM) ... Oct 4 2008, 09:06 AM
climber QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 4 2008, 11:06 AM) ... Oct 4 2008, 10:13 AM
Tman Yes, time to move on! And which one would you ... Oct 4 2008, 01:08 PM
vjkane I agree with Doug that simply buying more MERs ins... Oct 4 2008, 01:25 PM
Mariner9 The scary thing about the 'smaller cheaper rov... Oct 4 2008, 05:10 PM
imipak Whilst it's clear that neither MER or MSL are ... Oct 4 2008, 05:24 PM
centsworth_II QUOTE (imipak @ Oct 4 2008, 01:24 PM) ...... Oct 4 2008, 06:01 PM
ElkGroveDan We are starting to tread into that circular discus... Oct 4 2008, 06:06 PM
vjkane QUOTE (ElkGroveDan @ Oct 4 2008, 07:06 PM... Oct 4 2008, 06:31 PM
dvandorn If you have a reliable committment to fly a rover ... Oct 4 2008, 06:21 PM
centsworth_II QUOTE (dvandorn @ Oct 4 2008, 02:21 PM) W... Oct 4 2008, 06:33 PM
vjkane QUOTE (dvandorn @ Oct 4 2008, 07:21 PM) I... Oct 4 2008, 06:41 PM
djellison What's the point in talking about flying ... Oct 4 2008, 06:54 PM
vjkane QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 4 2008, 07:54 PM) ... Oct 4 2008, 07:12 PM
Burmese My initial comments about MSL were intended to foc... Oct 4 2008, 07:51 PM
vjkane QUOTE (Burmese @ Oct 4 2008, 08:51 PM) ..... Oct 4 2008, 07:55 PM
climber I remember that one of the reason the MERs flew an... Oct 4 2008, 08:57 PM
Burmese http://www.mcclatchydc.com/science/story/53487.htm... Oct 5 2008, 07:29 PM
vjkane QUOTE (Burmese @ Oct 5 2008, 07:29 PM) ht... Oct 5 2008, 08:47 PM
vjkane I did more research on the enhanced ExoMars, and w... Oct 5 2008, 09:01 PM
SFJCody All very depressing stuff. I get the sense the US ... Oct 5 2008, 09:38 PM
Fran Ontanaya http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/overview/
QUO... Oct 5 2008, 09:31 PM
gallen_53 My reading of the tea leaves is the whole Mars Pro... Oct 6 2008, 04:08 PM
vjkane QUOTE (gallen_53 @ Oct 6 2008, 04:08 PM) ... Oct 6 2008, 04:22 PM

gallen_53 QUOTE (vjkane @ Oct 6 2008, 05:22 PM) I... Oct 6 2008, 04:45 PM

gallen_53 QUOTE (vjkane @ Oct 6 2008, 04:22 PM) Als... Oct 6 2008, 05:07 PM
mcaplinger QUOTE (gallen_53 @ Oct 6 2008, 09:08 AM) ... Oct 7 2008, 03:44 AM
andrea I want to add a "couple" of consideratio... Oct 7 2008, 05:02 AM
gallen_53 QUOTE (andrea @ Oct 7 2008, 05:02 AM) I c... Oct 7 2008, 07:22 PM
djellison I think it's worth reminding people of the str... Oct 6 2008, 05:22 PM
gallen_53 QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 6 2008, 05:22 PM) ... Oct 6 2008, 06:26 PM
djellison You've quoted what I've said - but you... Oct 6 2008, 06:29 PM
djellison OK - a post explicitly calling for a specific pers... Oct 6 2008, 07:43 PM
Burmese There are a number of mainstream media outlets car... Oct 6 2008, 08:04 PM
dmuller I dont know how much money can be saved by launchi... Oct 7 2008, 04:27 AM
Fran Ontanaya Good points. Both MER and Phoenix show what rovers... Oct 7 2008, 05:38 AM
Juramike space.com article on the MSL "issues". Oct 8 2008, 03:51 AM
gpurcell My guess is that MSL flies eventually, just becaus... Oct 8 2008, 02:59 PM
BrianL Oops, bordering on political there, better be care... Oct 8 2008, 05:45 PM
Sunspot MEDIA ADVISORY: M08-200
NASA TO PROVIDE MARS SCIE... Oct 9 2008, 09:57 PM
climber I would say that the Title already state that MSL ... Oct 10 2008, 01:37 PM
Stu I'd agree with that... whilst keeping my finge... Oct 10 2008, 03:27 PM
climber I fully agree Stu. You say the right worlds. May b... Oct 10 2008, 04:51 PM
imipak NASA TV doesn't seem to be carrying the press ... Oct 10 2008, 07:03 PM
punkboi Woohoo! Here's hoping everything is still... Oct 10 2008, 07:45 PM
elakdawalla Very short statement. Decision is to continue una... Oct 10 2008, 07:04 PM
centsworth_II "The descent stage, otherwise known as the sk... Oct 10 2008, 07:11 PM
ChrisC Grrrr, the promised streaming http://www.nasa.gov/... Oct 10 2008, 07:11 PM
ChrisC QUOTE (ChrisC @ Oct 10 2008, 02:11 PM) Gr... Oct 12 2008, 03:53 PM

djellison QUOTE (ChrisC @ Oct 12 2008, 04:53 PM) Ca... Oct 12 2008, 04:10 PM

climber QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 12 2008, 06:10 PM)... Oct 13 2008, 07:09 PM
centsworth_II QUOTE (ChrisC @ Oct 10 2008, 03:11 PM) Gr... Oct 12 2008, 09:07 PM
rdale QUOTE (centsworth_II @ Oct 12 2008, 05:07... Oct 13 2008, 12:58 PM
elakdawalla You're not missing much. It's not too inf... Oct 10 2008, 07:15 PM
Stu I can't get on either... Never mind, not t... Oct 10 2008, 07:17 PM
elakdawalla The biggest thing causing both budget and schedule... Oct 10 2008, 07:21 PM
imipak Phew, that's a rare bit of good news. (I hope ... Oct 10 2008, 07:43 PM
centsworth_II QUOTE (imipak @ Oct 10 2008, 02:43 PM) ..... Oct 10 2008, 08:13 PM
elakdawalla The weight of MSL is the main problem. One specif... Oct 10 2008, 08:36 PM
centsworth_II "Among the major hardware problems: the actua... Oct 10 2008, 08:43 PM
imipak ( <snip!> lengthy ramble about the need ... Oct 10 2008, 08:55 PM
ustrax Fantastic piece of writing Emily!
Regardin... Oct 10 2008, 10:37 PM
climber QUOTE (ustrax @ Oct 11 2008, 12:37 AM) Fa... Oct 11 2008, 12:58 PM
Norm Hartnett http://www.lpi.usra.edu/pss/presentations/...10/gr... Oct 10 2008, 11:33 PM
gpurcell QUOTE (Norm Hartnett @ Oct 11 2008, 12:33... Oct 13 2008, 04:40 PM
MahFL Yes.....it's go !...for now.....
Go for M... Oct 13 2008, 04:54 PM

rdale QUOTE (MahFL @ Oct 13 2008, 12:54 PM) Yes... Oct 13 2008, 06:32 PM
SFJCody QUOTE (gpurcell @ Oct 13 2008, 05:40 PM) ... Oct 13 2008, 06:07 PM
Bobby From yahoo news.
No Delay from Nasa regarding MSL... Oct 11 2008, 06:17 AM
vjkane Alan Stern's thoughts on the MSL budget proble... Oct 30 2008, 09:25 PM
mcaplinger QUOTE (vjkane @ Oct 30 2008, 01:25 PM) Al... Oct 31 2008, 02:10 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 05:05 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|