IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Holy Cow!
manishm1020
post Oct 13 2008, 10:52 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 13-October 08
Member No.: 4450



Does anyone from the engineering side or the science team know the dimensions of the exposed ice under the lander? Particularly, the radius from the outermost ice periphery to the spacecraft centerline? Also, is there a DEM (digital elevation map) of the exposed ice sheet? I think this is the largest altered site due to plume effects seen in space exploration. Quite exciting! Any information that may be known would be great! Thanks!

PS. My preliminary calculations are: radius = ~ 60-75 cm and there appears to be three exposed regions.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
manishm1020
post Oct 21 2008, 02:04 PM
Post #2


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 13-October 08
Member No.: 4450



Does anyone have an estimate of how much ice was exposed after landing? I have gotten numbers from 1 m to 0.5 m in radius? Thanks so much!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PDP8E
post Jun 19 2010, 08:13 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 525
Joined: 10-October 06
From: Maynard Mass USA
Member No.: 1241



I have been exploring the Phoenix Analyst Notebook site this weekend and worked up some Holy Cow shots.

BTW: Is is me or is The Phoenix Notebook site kind of clunky to use?

These are Holy Cow images (processed) during the day and after midnight

Attached Image
Attached Image


I tried to merge them with a stacker - the results were NOT pretty!

Cheers


--------------------
CLA CLL
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mgrodzki
post Jun 24 2010, 10:14 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 119
Joined: 26-September 05
From: New York City
Member No.: 507



No higher res? That night shot is pretty spiffy.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Jun 24 2010, 10:25 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1029
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



Hang on, with being above the arctic circle, surely the "night shot" wasn't done at a literal night time.... ?


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jun 25 2010, 12:03 AM
Post #6


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13852
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



The RAC has LED's to illuminate the contents of the scoop remember. But I think it was just dusk-like, not actual pitch black.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Deimos
post Jun 25 2010, 02:14 AM
Post #7


Martian Photographer
***

Group: Members
Posts: 280
Joined: 3-March 05
Member No.: 183



The LED utility beyond the scoop is quite limited. The LEDs would not have given such an image. The Sun was 3-4 deg up, to the NNE. It was imaged by SSI around then, but it probably didn't even shine on the surface ("hill" in that direction), but the light was mostly diffuse anyway.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th November 2014 - 08:15 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.