IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
T47 (Nov. 19, 2008 / Rev 93), VIMS near Huygens Landing site
Juramike
post Nov 14 2008, 11:29 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



T47 Mission description available here!

VIMS noodling near Huygens Landing Site
CIRS looking at nitrile and hydrocarbon concentrations near the Equatorial limb
UVIS looking at aerosol concentrations in upper atmosphere (particulate data) from 2 (two) stellar occultations

And ISS will get some nice images of Hotei Arcus, E Xanadu, and W Fensal region (looks like Sotra Facula will be in the dark).

-Mike


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Nov 23 2008, 01:01 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



Here's a very rough lineup of the T47 narrow angle images over SE Xanadu superimposed on a wide angle view:
Attached Image


The red box image (N00124292) ID pretty solid, the other two are less clear.
The distinctive dark "caudal" shape in N00124292 looks similar to a feature central Adiri, - is it the same type of formation? (bright tectonic ridge cutting across a dark undulatory graben?)

I think N00124920 is a shot of Hotei Arcus.

[Man, figuring these out was pretty tough...]

-Mike



--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Nov 23 2008, 02:14 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (Juramike @ Nov 23 2008, 01:01 AM) *
I think N00124920 is a shot of Hotei Arcus.



I agree. It looks a lot like this one from the last encounter (posted 5 November):

"Is this Hotei Arcus? It will be interesting to look for any topographic shading at the terminator. Can't wait to see the processed mosaics.
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...ID=173100"

Mind you, nobody supplied the confirmation I was fishing for in that post. . .

--

Mike and everybody - do you think the recent Titan raws have got blander than usual (as happened once before when they changed some contrast setting) or is it just the terrain we're looking at here?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Nov 23 2008, 06:49 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1454
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



Quick question, my Titan map is a bit outdated (2006). Where can I find the most up-to-date Titan map?


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Nov 23 2008, 08:01 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1279
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA08399

I think Jason did this. Not sure if it's been updated recently.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Nov 24 2008, 03:12 AM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



QUOTE (ngunn @ Nov 23 2008, 09:14 AM) *
Do you think the recent Titan raws have got blander than usual (as happened once before when they changed some contrast setting) or is it just the terrain we're looking at here?


I've been wondering if they changed the way that they stretch the image when creating the raw image .jpeg files.

Another key factor may be the phase angle. The higher the phase angle, it *seems* the lower the contrast image. (I could be way wrong here, that's just been my supposition).

I was getting kinda nervous until the full-on shots from the Nov. 13 distant look showed a reassuring nice contrast.


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Nov 26 2008, 06:16 AM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



Playing around with compensating for the frustrating gradient exposure of surface images of Titan anywhere close to the terminator, I think I've got a method that might work OK. It worked on a test image, that with a distinctive "arrowhead and chevron shape" that is just to the W of Hotei Arcus.
Attached Image


Here's the recipe:
Converted the raw jpegs to 16-bit images then
Stack and averaging the images
Add a grayscale gradient that approximates the shading, adding an offset and gradient such that the bright white terrain is uniform across the image and the dark terrain is uniform across the image. (Add 0 to the brightest part of the image)
Then stretch the contrast.

-Mike






--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jekbradbury
post Nov 26 2008, 05:24 PM
Post #8


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 104
Joined: 1-June 08
Member No.: 4172



For comparison, here's a version of the same image, processed with just a high-pass filter:

Attached Image


The issue with such processing is that it gets rid of precisely the features that we're looking for: large albedo features like the "chevron".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Nov 27 2008, 04:57 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



Here's a work-in-progress mosaic of the T47 ISS images around Hotei Arcus:
Attached Image


They are aligned, but not a contrast balanced ensemble. (I switched to 8-bit processing, I couldn't get a negative offset to work with the 16-bit images.)



And like it seems after every home project, there are spare parts leftover. I have no idea where this goes. (There is a similar piece in the T46 mosaic):
Attached Image


Any suggestions?

-Mike


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rlorenz
post Nov 27 2008, 11:54 AM
Post #10


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 614
Joined: 23-February 07
From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1764



QUOTE (Juramike @ Nov 26 2008, 01:16 AM) *
..... that with a distinctive "arrowhead and chevron shape" that is just to the W of Hotei Arcus.


Mike

I hope you or someone can figure out what the arrowheads are. I remember we saw one (radar-bright)
in TA, and it always bugged me as something interesting whose origin is not obvious...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Nov 27 2008, 05:08 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



Intriguing, but I'm not sure what arrowheads we are talking about here. If there is a common class of them worth considering as a group then it would be nice to start a catalogue of annotated images. What scale range are we talking about? Huygens landed near a couple of beautiful arrowheads but the're a lot smaller than the shapes visible on ISS images. Can you point out the RADAR one(s) you have in mind? If there is a real case to crack here I'd like to be on the volunteer team. Perhaps we need to do a sort of 'arrowhead zoo'.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rlorenz
post Nov 28 2008, 12:55 PM
Post #12


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 614
Joined: 23-February 07
From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1764



QUOTE (ngunn @ Nov 27 2008, 12:08 PM) *
Can you point out the RADAR one(s) you have in mind? If there is a real case to crack here I'd like to be on the volunteer team. Perhaps we need to do a sort of 'arrowhead zoo'.


go for it!.

This is from TA, shown at 128 pix/degree (i.e. 375m/pixel or so, close to the intrinsic
resolution in this part of the swath). North is roughly up. This is (eyeballing) about 700km
East of Ganesa macula

Evidently acquired too long ago - isnt radar-bright after all; radar dark (compared to immediate
surrounds..)
Attached Image

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Nov 28 2008, 01:50 PM
Post #13


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



Aah right. It does jump out at you, I agree. However I can't see much difference between the ground inside the V and outside to the right of it. Perhaps the right stroke of the V is the 'feature' - a straightforward linear one. Cover that up and the rest of the area reverts to quasi-random (fractal) light/dark boundaries. It will be interesting to look for more, though.

Also maybe Mike or one of the others who did so well analysing those Meridiani dunefields might be able to answer the question: How many 'arrowheads' would we expect to find in the Titan images through chance alone, without a special cause? I would guess a few, given that linear streaks and linear boundaries seem to be fairly common.

Leaving the maths to the experts, I will when I get home empty a box of matches on the carpet and count the V's. I'll also take note if any happen to coincide with patterns on the carpet in a 'suggestive' way.

Results here later. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Nov 29 2008, 06:14 AM
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



Back to the T47 flyby...

I modified my method to deal with the gradient of Titan images near the terminator. Here is my latest processing of the T47 Hotei Arcus images side-by-side with my older 8-bit image:
Attached Image


Recipe:
Converted the raw jpegs to 16-bit images then
cosmic ray hit removal - Add median filter layer for each image, median filter 2 pixel, set layer opacity around 90%
Stack and average the images
Add a grayscale gradient that approximates the shading, (dark towards terminator, subtract 220 at brightest part of image)
Subtract the image and add a 50-100 unit offset.
Add curve layer for Anti-vignetting, add mask for AV layer (center dark, periphery bright)
Then stretch the contrast.

-Mike


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Nov 29 2008, 05:16 PM
Post #15


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



Making V's -the match experiment result as promised.

100 matches scattered on flowery carpet: just one well-formed V (defined as match ends meeting neatly at an acute angle). No correlation with carpet albedo features.

Nice work with Hotei Arcus images Mike.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 10:31 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.