My Assistant
Luna 1, 2 & 3 - 50 years hence |
Dec 8 2008, 09:24 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 149 Joined: 18-June 08 Member No.: 4216 |
Hi All,
I am not sure whether this is of interest to the community, but next year will see three rather significant 50th anniversaries in unmanned lunar and interplanetary spaceflight, those of Luna-1, the first probe to escape the gravitational field of the Earth (lunar impact intended), Luna-2, the first probe to actually hit the Moon and Luna 3, the first probe to image the Moon's far side. Luna-1 was launched on 2nd January 1959 and flew by the Moon on the 4th of the same month at a distance of 6000 km on its way to heliocentric orbit. http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/masterCatalog.do?sc=1959-012A Luna-2 was launched on the 12th of September of the same year, hitting the Moon on the 14th in the Palus Putredinus region (0 degrees longitude, 29 degrees N latitude) near the crater Archimedes. http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/masterCatalog.do?sc=1959-014A Luna-3 was launched less than a month later on 4th October (the second anniversary of Sputnik-1), swung around the Moon to image the far side on the 7th and transmittted its data to the Earth by the 18th. http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/masterCatalog.do?sc=1959-008A I don't know about you but I'm thinking of raising a glass of champagne a day later than New Year's Day in honour of Korolev and his merry band of pioneers. Happy Holidays to All, Tolis. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 20 2009, 11:42 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 66 Joined: 8-November 05 From: Australia Member No.: 547 |
Its gratifying to see so many UMSF'ies defending the Soviet probes! I am more used to listening to the same old derogatory critique and snide comments about "shoddy engineering"
It is fair to say though that had Soviet electronic components and system integration been more robust, they would have enjoyed much greater success, particularly at Mars. Mars 2 & 3 were badly affected by radio system failures, which may well have cost the Soviets the coup of the first image from the martian surface (there is a school of thought that says the loss of signal was not a problem with the lander, but was due to the orbiter dropping the relay link. Similarly, the failures of the Mars 4-7 armada was due mostly to faulty chips that crippled the control systems. Similarly, the loss of Phobos 2 is chalked up to a computer failure. I'm REALLY keen to see Phobos-Grunt fly! It would be great to see Russia get a fully successful Mars mission on the scoreboard. The flip side is that a failure would be a gut-punch. I was depressed for 3 weeks after Mars 96 successfully probed the Pacific Ocean, Bolivia and Chile... |
|
|
|
tolis Luna 1, 2 & 3 - 50 years hence Dec 8 2008, 09:24 PM
ZenDraken I'd love to see a recovery mission for some of... Dec 9 2008, 04:54 AM
tedstryk Luna 2 smashed into the moon and Luna 3 burned up ... Dec 9 2008, 12:37 PM
As old as Voyager Speaking of recovery...I've always thought tha... Dec 9 2008, 07:23 PM
Geert QUOTE (As old as Voyager @ Dec 10 2008, 02... Jan 18 2009, 09:49 AM
dvandorn Yep -- but only Snoopy's ascent stage survives... Dec 9 2008, 08:08 PM
ilbasso QUOTE (dvandorn @ Dec 9 2008, 03:08 PM) Y... Dec 11 2008, 12:59 AM
ZenDraken QUOTE (ilbasso @ Dec 10 2008, 04:59 PM) T... Dec 11 2008, 06:19 AM
dvandorn QUOTE (ZenDraken @ Dec 11 2008, 12:19 AM)... Dec 11 2008, 06:37 AM
imipak For those vehicles that impacted the moon, it... Dec 9 2008, 09:18 PM
charborob I remember seeing pictures of some of the craters ... Dec 9 2008, 09:39 PM
Phil Stooke The pictures are in the Apollo 16 Preliminary Scie... Dec 9 2008, 09:55 PM
kenny I'm very familiar with Phil's 3 flights, a... Dec 9 2008, 10:26 PM
tolis QUOTE (kenny @ Dec 9 2008, 10:26 PM) I... Dec 10 2008, 11:24 PM
Phil Stooke I'll drink to that!
Phil Dec 10 2008, 02:25 PM
Phil Stooke The tracking wasn't very good, but certainly m... Dec 11 2008, 12:15 AM
dvandorn I just realized I mis-stated something. At the ti... Dec 11 2008, 06:15 AM
PhilCo126 NASA had a long "learning" path with the... Dec 11 2008, 09:50 AM
Phil Stooke Dvandorn mentions other impacts having dark ejecta... Dec 11 2008, 02:07 PM
Paolo Very good site for the 50th anniversary of Luna fi... Dec 30 2008, 10:09 AM
Zvezdichko Yeah, this is the best website.
By the way - does... Dec 30 2008, 10:18 AM
Zvezdichko Happy anniversary!
50 years ago this day the ... Jan 2 2009, 10:46 AM
Paolo Speaking of Luna 1, some images from contemporary ... Jan 6 2009, 10:41 AM
dvandorn Hmmm... old Snoop was put into a heliocentric orbi... Jan 18 2009, 04:54 PM
lyford QUOTE (dvandorn @ Jan 18 2009, 08:54 AM) ... Jan 18 2009, 06:47 PM
Geert QUOTE (dvandorn @ Jan 18 2009, 11:54 PM) ... Jan 20 2009, 02:30 AM
nprev Lyford, I've always been fascinated by the des... Jan 18 2009, 07:00 PM
Zvezdichko QUOTE The basic paradigm for the Soviet vehicles s... Jan 18 2009, 08:28 PM
Big_Gazza AFAIK a lot of the visual differences between Sovi... Jan 19 2009, 09:05 AM
Phil Stooke "The Soviets with their much less capable ind... Jan 20 2009, 04:07 AM
Bernard I totally agree whith your opinion, Phil.
Soviet e... Jan 20 2009, 08:36 AM
ugordan QUOTE (Bernard @ Jan 20 2009, 09:36 AM) I... Jan 20 2009, 09:57 AM
Geert QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 20 2009, 04:57 PM) B... Jan 20 2009, 10:52 AM
PhilCo126 Well indeed, but then again, these "Soviet-Ru... Jan 28 2009, 08:57 PM
Zvezdichko Happy anniversary, Lunar enthusiasts!
50 year... Sep 14 2009, 11:22 AM
Paolo Thanks, I was about to forget about that! Sep 14 2009, 04:33 PM
Paolo Today is the 50th anniversary of the launch of Lun... Oct 4 2009, 08:59 AM
Paolo Translated by Babel Fish from a post on the Novost... Oct 4 2009, 09:22 AM
Paolo Speaking of the first pictures of the farside of t... Oct 19 2009, 05:00 PM
Phil Stooke Yes, it is a very interesting cartographic curiosi... Oct 19 2009, 05:32 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 01:57 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|